The editor’s review invitation was received. I don’t know how this journal is, and I have never heard of it before. It’s embarrassing.

(0) Thank | Fisher

My manuscript was rejected directly. The reason is the following, “The paper is not acceptable because the overall scientific content is too low for the Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. MOREOVER YOUR MANUSCRIPT DOESN'T FOLLOW OUR JOURNAL RULES AND GUIDELINES, WHICH IS THE FIRST RULE FOR ANY SUBMISSION.” At the end, it was also said politely, “Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.”

(0) Thank | story8023

I would like to ask you guys, the editor sent me such an email: a minimum of four suitable potential reviewers (please provide their names, email addresses, and institutional affiliation) should be provided. When compiling this list of potential reviewers please consider the following important criteria: they must be knowledgeable about the manuscript subject area; must not be from your own institution or country; and they should not have recent (less than four years) joint publications with any of the authors. So, how do I write this?

(0) Thank | Anny

Slow review speed. About 4 months for the 1st decision. Editor is very good though.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I also received a review invitation, and I thought it was some rubbish journal. However, Q4 is also poor

(0) Thank | 钟先生

I also received it

(0) Thank | 钟先生

I also unexpectedly received a review invitation, but it seems that the article is not related to my expertise. I am not sure if I should accept the review

(0) Thank | 瓶儿~

The editorial department is very slow in providing feedback. It had to be revised three times in total, with the first revision being a major one. However, each time it took more than two months for the revisions to be completed. The speed is really not commendable. If there is no urgency, you can consider submitting the manuscript. In total, it took 14 months to be accepted and 17 months to be published.

(0) Thank | 酒笙清栀

Quickly received the first two days of the 13-year mid-year collection. I am also speechless.

(0) Thank | lsx20131120a2163.com

has been in use for 1 and a half years, and has not yet published

(0) Thank | freshman

This journal gives me the feeling how it seems to be the information of the year, hehe...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The journal is so slow, it’s already in December, how can it be included in the seventh issue now?Do you dare to remind the editor?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I received an invitation to review the publication. I don’t know the status of the publication. The publication should now be a monthly journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Environmental Engineering and Management Journal The journal was submitted by e-mail. It was submitted in April 2012. In November, it received the first-instance opinion, a major repair, and a minor repair.The revised manuscript will be submitted in December and the minor review will be held on December 10.The revised draft was uploaded on December 25 and accepted in January.Currently, the proof version has not been received in October 2013.This publication has been published very slowly. Since 2013, it has published five issues, three of which are special issues, mainly conference papers.Publishing is very slow.The number of papers currently accepted is more than 400.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal has been accepted, may I ask you: How long will it take to see the journal?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Posting through the mailbox, why did you not receive the message of successful delivery, and there is no automatic reply.The heroes who have selectd are dismissed under the

(1) Thank | Anonymous

feeling that the article is not fast depends on the speed of the reviewer. If one of the three reviewers has a long review time, the review comments will be returned.It is very slow.By the way, answering the questions downstairs, the impact factor of the previous year is updated every June, so the 2011 impact factor has been shown before. The 12-year impact factor is updated in June 2013. This journal looks like 1.17

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has not been included in SCI since December of last year, will it be kicked out!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2012. 4 Submission 2012.11 Review comments returned major revision2012.12 Changed back to 2013. 2 Accepted but edited in the letter stressed "At this moment we cannot say for sure when your paper will be published, dueTo the large number of already accepted articles."

(0) Thank | Anonymous

1, submitted on February 2nd, received a format modification notice on February 12, returned on February 19, and sent to external trial on February 20.Email responses are replies within 1 month.Estimated to be slow and slow!NEW: 12 issues per year since 2010

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I submitted this manuscript in May 2011. It may be that some errors occurred during the process of sending experts for review. It was not received until February 2012.The first wave of review comments.(2 times in the middle, the editor replies that it is in peer review).In June 2012, I received another wave of comments. After returning, I was notified of it soon.However, due to the number of accepted articles, up to now, in January 2013, the number has not been published..If you are in a hurry, you must choose carefully.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

12 issues per year since 2010

(0) Thank | Anonymous