The external review was responsible, giving comments of revision in one sentence by one sentence. In addition, the questions raised were very professional. The article was submitted in August 2019. It took 7 months for the first review, and a lot of review comments were given (mainly because of the application of the long sentences). The revised manuscript was submitted in 2 weeks. One month after the submission of the revision according to the first review, the result of the second review was returned. The first expert pointed out some sentence problems. It was submitted on the same day after revision, and it was accepted in a week.

(37) Thank | 小健

Received 18 November 2019; Received in revised form 21 March 2020; Accepted 22 March 2020; online 2 April 2020. I modified twice in total. The first time four reviewers asked more than 190 questions in total and only 6 minor questions the second time. It took less than four and a half months from submission to publication. It was terrible for me to revise the manuscript, and it took 45 days to make changes. Thank the hard-working editors and reviewers. The first article in my life! Yay!

(29) Thank | sonny超级萌

Received 12 August 2019, Revised 18 November 2019, Accepted 9 December 2019, Available online 13 December 2019. The first manuscript was submitted in August and then comments were received at the end of October. The editor-in-chief was very dedicated and the invited reviewers were all very professional in the field. Since one of the three reviewers whom the editor found seemed not to be knowledgeable in my field very well, the editor who was in charge invited two more reviewers. Thus, there was a long-time delay. But the last unified opinions of the five reviewers were all minor revisions. It took three weeks to modify and submit it. Finally, after more than a month of waiting, it was directly accepted. Thank the editor in chief for being extremely dedicated to his work. He was really kind of editor that comments would be given only when he found suitable reviewers. The comments provided by the reviewers were very in-depth and instructive for my future work. Benefited a lot.

(4) Thank | liuyangheu

Fast responses. Email reminders at each stage. Innovation requirements are high. Be careful with language and formatting. Personally, I feel that Engineering Structures is a very good journal, especially the structural direction.

(2) Thank | pe_sh@sina.com

Under review on May 31, 2025.

(0) Thank | huangchenglong

6.12 RRC
6.19 Accept
It took half a year, but fortunately.

(0) Thank | 早日毕业！

It's quite difficult.

(0) Thank | 阿里亚斯

With a 6.4 vote, we are still in the lead.

(0) Thank | Echo Riya

It has been half a month and he is still with her.

(0) Thank | 我要发顶刊1

I am in the same situation as you. I had two submissions for revision, one of which was reviewed and approved on the same day, while the second one took about 20 days to be approved. The third submission has not been reviewed yet. I submitted it for revision on April 5th, and it has been two and a half months now and the third reviewer has still not accepted the submission for review. The editor has also not taken any action. I am still waiting.

(0) Thank | aszzz

The submission was rejected as the topic did not fit the scope of the recommended journals. I am a bit confused, is research on pressure vessel structures for marine equipment not relevant?

(0) Thank | 墨非是白

6.12 with editor

(0) Thank | 我要发顶刊1

The submission made on May 28 is still with the editor. Normally, we would receive a response within ten days. Should we send an email to inquire about the status?

(0) Thank | huliangliang

I also shot 6.4 today, ur.

(0) Thank | wanan111

I submitted on June 4th, and it has not been updated by the editor since that day.

(0) Thank | 我要发顶刊1

Bro, I just submitted my application, I submitted it after midnight and now it's 6 pm. This is my first time applying to ES, can you let me know how you're doing now...

(0) Thank | 冷雨若言丶

Okay, thank you.

(0) Thank | fighting

No problem, 35 pages, 40 pages are all fine.

(0) Thank | YMMMMM

Excuse me, is it acceptable for the number of revised pages to exceed 30?

(0) Thank | fighting

Submitted on March 21, 2025.
Sent back for revisions on April 27, 2025. Three reviewers, two major revisions. The opinion of another reviewer was incorrect, not related to my paper.
Resubmitted for revisions on May 25, 2025.
Invited three reviewers for the second round, two accepted quickly, one finished the review on the same day. However, one reviewer hasn't accepted the review yet, and the editor hasn't found a new reviewer. The status is still under review. Not sure if I should remind the editor.

(0) Thank | 谢智文

The submission was made on May 30th and is currently "With Editor". Does this mean it will be rejected?

(0) Thank | Jy杨

The third opinion has returned, the results will be out on June 3rd, minor revisions are needed as one reviewer has requested clarification on a small issue, and once that is done, please resubmit by June 5th.

(0) Thank | 早日毕业！

It has been over half a month and the RRC has not changed DIP yet.

(0) Thank | IDYee

Since the last update, there has been no action. After contacting customer service, they helped me contact the journal manager. The manager replied that they have already urged the editor on my behalf, but there is still no action. I feel like the editor has disappeared.

(0) Thank | xxxt

Has your ES produced results? I just switched from RRC to DP.

(1) Thank | fighting