The article was submitted in October 2019, and the review comments were received in about 2 months after submission. There were 4 reviewers; 2 reviewers raised many comments; the third reviewer thought the innovation was not enough, but also gave suggestions; the fourth reviewer was the editor-in-chief, who also gave some suggestions, which was tantamount to major revision. The comments of the review experts were very professional. After revision, the article was relatively greatly improved. Due to the need to recalculate a lot of working conditions and the pandemic, it was completely delayed. The editor of this journal was very nice repeatedly agreed to postpone the deadline for submitting the revised manuscript. It was reviewed twice later, each time it took about one month and a half for the return of the review comments. The notice of acceptance was received in October this year. Due to the influence of the pandemic, the entire submission cycle of my article was as long as one year, which was really uneasy. However, the result was still good. The journal's impact factor soared to 5.8, which was unexpected and hoped to maintain.

(17) Thank | hnu_CW

The review is very timely, and comments was returned in about one month. This is the first time I submitted to a SCI journal, and I had no experience. I was asked to revise and resubmit. There were four reviewers. One of them had been requiring meticulous revisions to the abstract and background of the paper. The opinions given of language requirements are more pertinent compared with the other reviewers. There were only two reviewers in the second review. One reviewer proposed to add content for grid independence inspection and experimental verification, and the other one requested to modify the format of the references. There was only one reviewer for the third review. This reviewer requested that the experimental verification part be divided into a separate section, and the experimental verification part be introduced in detail. The language requirements were also given. There was a sentence in the abstract that was too long, which he said it took three times to read it. After the third revision, I waited for about a month and it was accepted directly. It is now in the publishing stage. The difficulty of this journal is not too high, the review is also very timely, the impact factor has exceeded 5, and it is expected that the difficulty of acceptance in the future may increase. The link for submission is: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tcfm

(23) Thank | Chen.

Submitted in February 19, accepted in February 20, which lasted one year in total. It underwent 6 revisions in the middle, and each review cycle lasted about one and a half months. There were 5 reviewers for the first review, three of them gave a lot of comments, and it was rejected.

(12) Thank | Easonpp

Each review cycle is about 1 month. 3 reviewers. Be very careful with revisions. In general, reviewers are very professional, very attentive, and editors are also very responsible. Not difficult to get accepted.

(0) Thank | pengqianlei@foxmail.com

How can I find out the end time of "out for review"? What does "under review" in the system mean? Does it mean the reviewers have accepted the review or completed the review?

(0) Thank | hll

May I ask how to reply? My reply is as follows.

(0) Thank | 捞我一把

06 January 2025 With Journal Administrator
16 January 2025 With Editor
17 January 2025 Out for Review
24 March 2025 Revision Required
04 May 2025 Revision Incomplete
04 May 2025 Revised Manuscript Submitted
09 May 2025 With Editor
09 May 2025 Out for Review
28 May 2025 Revision Required
19 June 2025 Revised Manuscript Submitted
26 June 2025 With Editor
30 June 2025 Out for Review
02 July 2025 Accepted

The overall submission process went well, but it was a bit frustrating to be asked to add a case by the reviewer.

(0) Thank | RyanQ

5.16 entered UR, it has been two months now. Can I urge it?

(0) Thank | xucz

How many reviewers are typically invited for review?

(0) Thank | hll

I would like to ask, can we submit our pure fluid experiment to this journal?

(0) Thank | 王大森

Can I submit this journal for pure fluid experiment? Or is it necessary to have numerical simulation?

(0) Thank | 王大森

Has the review speed slowed down recently? I submitted on January 27th and it was reviewed on January 29th. But after submitting the major revision, it has been a week and it is still in the hands of the editor, not being sent for review.

(0) Thank | xucz

I feel the same way, it's getting harder and harder to submit to this journal.

(0) Thank | 冈崎朋也

The three sentences you replied with are also these.

(0) Thank | 乌拉拉拉拉

Does this journal require strict formatting for submissions?

(0) Thank | 乌拉拉拉拉

This journal requires the submission of a DOI or other link to the data file when submitting a manuscript. Is it mandatory to submit?

(0) Thank | 乘风Pr

The outcome is unknown as it has already been submitted.

(0) Thank | yijia814

Submit by 1.20, review by 1.27.

(0) Thank | xucz

How long does it take to send for external review?

(0) Thank | ddlianyi

Is "out for review" mean it has been sent for external review?

(0) Thank | xucz

Is it possible to lower the price?

(0) Thank | 猪在海中游

Usually it takes about half a month to review.

(0) Thank | weiweiliao

Rejected in just 4 days. Reasons include lack of novelty, not suitable for this journal, and unclear expression in the article.

(0) Thank | zju_zachary

This is OA, payment is required.

(0) Thank | 风枫之

Is there a layout fee for this?

(0) Thank | ztdep