June 07-----initial submission; Sep 19------Major revisions; Oct 11-------submitted the revised version; Dec 25------Decision in Process (Merry Christmas); Dec 27------Accept. IFAC, a well-known journal, which is stabilized in Q2. Hope it can to be upgraded to Q1 next year.

(13) Thank | Icevor

Being accepted by this journal was much more difficult than Knowledge-Based Systems, although its impact factor is not as high as KBS. For the article submitted to Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, there were three reviewers, all of whom were experts in small fields. A lot of comments were raised for this article, which hit the key of the article. I was given a chance of making major revision, but I was convinced by the comments of the reviewers! Wish me luck!

(123) Thank | TS

Received 26 September 2018; Received in revised form 23 November 2018; Accept 21 January 2019

(1) Thank | xanxus9231

The review speed of this journal is OK, and it will be reviewed in about two months. This is worthy of praise. However, there are many reviewers. I have 6 reviewers for this article. I have experienced 4 revisions.

(7) Thank | Anonymous

Excuse me, when submitting a paper to EAAI, does the initial draft have to be single-column? Will a double-column initial draft be rejected by the editors directly?

(0) Thank | zzzfish

4.28 STJ (number over seven thousand)

(0) Thank | Karl_Li

I also want to know.

(0) Thank | 丸子1988

On April 6th, STJ is still "we" now.

(0) Thank | kkyyyy

Do we need to add a Title Page before the manuscript?

(0) Thank | echo21

When the editor sent me a reminder email to submit the articles, they mentioned 4 articles. However, I only received three articles a few days ago and returned them. It should be three or more articles.

(0) Thank | gao..99

I also made a similar comment, can I report AISWare as well?

(0) Thank | LDoc

Isn't it enough to just receive feedback from two reviewers?

(0) Thank | DK

May I ask what is the required rate of repetition for EAAI?

(0) Thank | echo21

It's too scary.

(0) Thank | zzyymm

This journal is extremely slow. The submission was made in August 2024, under review in September 2024, and accepted in April 2025. However, even after 2 weeks of acceptance, the proof link has not been received. If you are in urgent need to graduate, please think twice before submitting to this journal.

(0) Thank | LiZn000

Encountered GPT review, the reviewer asked fifteen "what" and "how" questions. If we don't want to review, we should just reject it directly. Why harm people like this?

(0) Thank | laies

You can write an email politely inquiring about the progress of the editing, stating that this is important to you. In theory, the editor should be prompting the reviewer if they have been taking a long time to approve the manuscript.

(0) Thank | yychengchen

It has not been submitted yet, must check the review status every day, the progress is so slow.

(0) Thank | zzyymm

Excuse me, does anyone know how many reviewers are required for the second review of this journal? The current status is 2-2-3, one reviewer has left, and it has been over a month since the last status update. The editor has also not invited any new reviewers.

(0) Thank | Joy04

Has it not been submitted for review yet? I submitted on the 9th and it's the 22nd now.

(0) Thank | ontzero

I am also waiting for one month for RRC, and only one reviewer has provided feedback. It's so slow.

(0) Thank | 冲冲冲11

Is it necessary to have four reviewers for this journal? I only have three and can't find the fourth one.

(0) Thank | gao..99

Not necessarily, it could also be relatively leisurely.

(0) Thank | yychengchen

Is it not ideal to have the review completed on the same day it is received?

(0) Thank | 一条咸鱼

Still in WE, please add some speed.

(0) Thank | zzyymm