It was my first time to have an article accepted by Energy, which is very meaningful. 2020.05.11, submitted; 2020.05.14, with editor; 2020.06.30, under review; 2020.08.13, major revision; 2020.08.27, revised manuscript submitted; 2020.09.06, minor revision; 2020.09.07, revised manuscript submitted; 2020.09.07, under review; 2020.09.28, accepted. During the period, it took one month and a half for “with editor”, which made me disheartened and felt that it would be rejected. However, the news of major revision suddenly came, the comments of three reviewers were all positive. After the submission of the first revised manuscript, the comments of the second review were soon returned and minor revision was required. There were only some language issues. However, the edited didn’t accepted it for a long time. And I missed the deadline of scholarship review. However, the final result was good. I analyze here: After revision, the article can be basically confirmed that it will be accepted immediately. But its status is still with editor or under review for a long time. It may be the editor's consideration based on the layout of the annual limited number of issues. Finally, thanks to editor Silvia Azucena Nebra!

(0) Thank | 雕大吃四方

2019.07.06, submitted; 2019.07.10, with editor; 2019.07.15, under review; 2019.09.16, major revision: one Reviewer recommends rejection, and the others recommend possible reconsideration after major revisions; 2019.11.02, revised and submitted; 2019.11.15, under review; 2020.01.15, major revision; 2020.02.27, revised and submitted; 2020.02.28, with editor; 2020.03.2, under review; 2020.03.19, required reviewers completed; 2020.03.20, accept.

(3) Thank | 试着改变

Thanks! 2019.07.10 Submit to Journal; 2019.07.12 With Editor; 2019.07.15 Under Review; 2019.07.30 Under Review; 2019.08.10 Under Review; 2019.09.03 Under Review; 2019.09.08 Under Review; 2019.09.09 Under Editor Evaluation; 2019.09.12 Major Revised; 2019.10.28 Revision Submitted to Journal (R1); 2019.10.30 With Editor; 2019.11.01 Under Review; 2019.11.30 Minor Revised; 2019.12.12 Revision Submitted to Journal (R2); 2019.12.12 Accept.

(21) Thank | 开心最重要

3 month first review. 2 reviewers.

(0) Thank | yzyzhongyu@126.com

2025/04/22 4-1-0
2025/04/30 6-2-0

(0) Thank | jl6621

Have you been hired after the third review of your DIP? How many days has it been since the DIP? Last year, my article was rejected after the second review of the DIP, and now I am in a similar situation with another article.

(0) Thank | hehhhh

4.29 Overhaul, thanks to the kind-hearted editors and reviewers.

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

Does anyone know how long it takes for a Dip to last?

(0) Thank | qatamin

Foreign editors, send 15 and receive 1 back, it's been over two months.

(0) Thank | huahua

4.28 send 14 pick up 3 return 3 RRC.

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 接接接接接接

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

Please translate the following passage into English: 接接接接

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

Have you been accepted after the second review of DIP? Last year, my article was rejected more than a week after the second review of DIP. Yesterday, another RRC article was changed to DIP on the same day after the second review. Is it common for energy reviewers to play games with the second review?

(0) Thank | hehhhh

Did you get accepted after the second review of DIP? Last year, my article was rejected after more than a week of the second review of DIP. Yesterday, another article was changed from RRC to DIP on the same day of the second review. Is it common for energy reviewers to play such a high probability of the second review?

(0) Thank | hehhhh

After your second review, were you accepted for DIP? Last year, my article was rejected more than a week after the second review, and yesterday another article's RRC turned into DIP on the same day. Now, is it common for energy reviewers to have such a high probability of rejecting articles after the second review?

(0) Thank | hehhhh

4.27 send 14 pick up 3 return 2 RRC

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

It's been almost two months with the editor, and despite sending emails to follow up, there has been no update on the status.

(0) Thank | 好好学习好好好

Hello, may I ask whether you are seeking the opinions of three reviewers or two reviewers?

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

Reviewers with efficient and soft-hearted editorial skills.

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

This is too efficient. I have been submitting my work for over six months now.

(0) Thank | 该休息了

Please translate the following paragraph into English: "接好运qaq"

(0) Thank | 希望能中论文求求求求

How do I ask customer service to expedite my order?

(0) Thank | HM1

Complete timeline:
2025.03.05 stj-we
2025.03.06 we
2025.03.10 ur(6-1-0)
2025.03.27 RRC(6-2-2)
2025.03.31 ur(10-3-2)
2025.04.05 RRC(12-3-3)
2025.04.08 major revision
2025.04.15 rstj-we
2025.04.16 we
2025.04.16 ur(3-2-0)
2025.04.22 RRC(3-2-2)
2025.04.25 Accept

(0) Thank | xxz

During the submission period, I checked everyone's submission experience every day. I just received the acceptance and would like to share my submission journey:
8/5/2024: with editor
12/7/2024: under review. After being reminded by the system and customer service, it was sent for review
1/4/2025: major revision. The review process was very fast
1/31/2025: revision submitted to journal
2/1/2025: under review. Reviewer 1 completed the review quickly during the second review, but it took a long time to find the second reviewer
4/25/2025: accept

(0) Thank | 暗香盈袖

So I was quite puzzled, and even without choosing an option, I rejected it with just a few words.

(0) Thank | D7