The direction is metal bulk electrodeposition. Now there are not many articles about deposition published on EA, or most of them are related to batteries. 9.9 Submission; 10.22 revision comments returned, and there’s only one reviewer, with 6 comments; 10.24 revised submission; 10.25 it was sent back for revision again. The reviewer was really tough and must get a satisfactory answer; 10.28 after we carefully revised the paper and replied to the reviewer, it was submitted again; 10.29 accepted. The editor was P. Allongue. This was the first time I submitted to EA. The article was carefully prepared. From raising the idea to writing the patent, conducting the experiment, and then being delayed by the epidemic, we spent more than a year. But such a result was worthy of the hard work.

(28) Thank | chantonfi

Submitted on February 25, 2020 and under review on March 1. We waited a long time for 2 months, and when I was preparing to urge the manuscript, I received the review comments on May 7. It turned out that the editor sent the review comments of other people's articles to me. I wrote to the editor the same day to explain the situation, and it was under review again that night. I was worried that it could be another long wait. Fortunately, the editor sent me the correct review comments two days later, and explained the reason for the 2-month review cycle was that one of the reviewers has not been reached, and the email reminder has not been responded. In the end, only one reviewer’s opinion was returned. A minor revision was required for changing the format and title. I finally got the luck at the right time. Returned on May 11 and accepted on May 14. They sent the copyright agreement on May 21, and the proof on May 26. Then it was online on May 31. What I want to say is that sometimes EA does have a review cycle of more than two months. I have encountered this several times. So it's best to go to EA's official website to see how long the average cycle is for the recently published articles. The data in LetPub is for reference only.

(7) Thank | bohemian

With the thankful thing that the associate editor was downgraded to Q2, let me talk about my submission experience. After submitting the manuscript, it took three and a half months for the first review, and the comments finally came back. There were four reviewers in total. Three reviewers’ comments came back and all were positive. However, one of the reviewers was a freak who didn’t understand my article according to his comments. I verified and supplemented the data for a month. Two months after return, the freak reviewer was still not satisfied without reason two months after returning the manuscript. In the end, the fucking editor rejected it. It took full six months. This editor is too terrible. I will never submit to this junk journal in the future. It was really pleasant that this journal dropped to Q2.

(85) Thank | 往上走

Let’s write about my review process. I used to think that EA reviewed the manuscripts quickly before submitting. Now, looking at my submission process and everyone’s, I feel that it is really slow, and my love for EA has dropped a lot. It’s better not to submit to it again. It’s too slow. 2019.6.10 submitted to the journal; 2019.7.1 under review; 2019.7.6 under editor evaluation; 2019.7.14 under editor evaluation; 2019.7. 30 Still under evaluation. I don’t know what exactly the editors are doing.

(7) Thank | asdfdsa

February 7: Submitted the article. March 17: Made reply to the first review comments. April 15: first revision resubmitted. April 30: The time of under review was changed. May 17: The time of under review was changed again. I'm tired and exhausted, because the college requires more than two articles to get the master’s degree. I'm waiting for the second article, or I cannot get my job. The college requires the submission of a degree application on May 31. I hope everyone can cheer me up! Hope I can get my degree successfully! I will definitely come back to reciprocate!

(36) Thank | shiny001

3 reviewers. High requirement for innovation. Be very detailed and careful in your replies.

(0) Thank | andersonyi@613.com

Thank you to the editor and the reviewers.

(0) Thank | 张文远

Submission on May 3, 2025
Invitation to Reviewer on May 6, 2025
1 revision based on feedback from 4 reviewers on May 26, 2025
Revised manuscript resubmitted on July 8, 2025
1 revision based on feedback from 1 reviewer on July 9, 2025
Revised manuscript resubmitted on July 20, 2025 and accepted in 1.5 hours
Thanks to Professor Jiangping Tu from Zhejiang University for the fast processing.

(0) Thank | niupotr

Submitted on April 10, 2025
Accepted on June 16, 2025
Available online on July 3, 2025.
Thanks to Ms. Komal Sinha for editing, it was a pleasure working together. Thanks to the editorial and publishing departments for their joint efforts, and thanks to everyone for their contributions. I hope the journal will continue to improve and increase its impact factor.

(0) Thank | SAIJINWANG

Thank you to the editor Robert Milosz Kostecki, the efficiency is really high, and we received it within one month.

(0) Thank | 别吧

Excuse me, was it a direct rejection?

(0) Thank | juice

Why doesn't Electrochimica Acta have paper numbers?

(0) Thank | juice

Why does Electrochimica Acta not have paper numbers?

(0) Thank | juice

19.6.25 Submitted

(0) Thank | Bibi

19.6.25 Submited

(0) Thank | Bibi

Want to submit the paper

(0) Thank | Bibi

Written incorrectly on 06-17, the second review has not yet been returned.

(0) Thank | Elvis007

05-25 Submit / With Editor
05-27 Under Review
06-02 Submission 6, accept review 1, return review 1
06-17 Submission 8, accept review 2, return review 2
Also submitted one more in between, hoping for a good result.

(0) Thank | Elvis007

Waiting for submission

(0) Thank | Bibi

How much time it take for the first decision?

(0) Thank | Bibi

5.15 submit
5.19 under review (4 to 1)
5.23 Completion of Reviewer 1's comments
5.23 Continue to invite two more reviewers
5.26 Still no response from reviewers, hoping for a second reviewer soon, wishing for a smooth submission, blessings.

(0) Thank | coco1234

Recently the speed is simply terrifying. Submitted on March 25th, it was reviewed the next day. Received two review comments on April 7th and returned the revised version on the same day. It took a long time to supplement the BET of 8 samples. Uploaded the revised manuscript at 11 am on May 8th, and it was reviewed on the same day. The acceptance was received at 9 pm. Thanks to Professor Zhou from Nankai University.

(0) Thank | swimvc

The major has been changed to Chemistry.

(0) Thank | 醇色9

Finally back to District Two.

(0) Thank | 不爬树的猴子

3.14已提交至期刊。

(0) Thank | Dannie爱喝绿豆泥