I helped my supervisor review a manuscript from this journal before. The article was so trashy that I couldn’t stand it. However, due to the pressure of my supervisor, I was forced to read it through and made a lot of comments. At that time, I didn’t have a good impression on this journal. The trashy articles were also sent for review. Did the editor have any academic ability? Later, at the time of my submission, my supervisor still required me to submit to this journal. The status changed to with editor in a week, and it was rejected in one more week. The editor of this journal really has no academic ability. Thank you for not accepting it.

(0) Thank | blingblingling

Is it the same deputy editor as before?

(0) Thank | youmingmeia

Throw the ball quickly, check with the editor, the second pitch is dead slow, the editor will drag you for a week, it has been dipping for several days, it is not conducive to refuse.

(0) Thank | 燕双鹰

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

(0) Thank | Julia

The status of my submission changed to 'Under review' on the day I submitted it. Does this mean it has been sent out for external review?

(0) Thank | Julia

Submitted on December 12th, sent for external review on the same day.
Received external review feedback on January 8th, revised on January 16th.
Accepted on January 19th.
What a speed!

(0) Thank | 燕双鹰

Outrageous.

(0) Thank | 努力啊大秀雅

Submitted the manuscript on June 29th;
Received the reviewers' comments on August 5th, with minor revisions requested by two experts, and required to submit the revised manuscript within 20 days;
Submitted the revised manuscript on August 24th;
On September 10th, it was noted that the reviewers had completed their review, and the next day it was returned to the editor;
The paper was accepted on September 13th.
It feels like the reviewers only submitted their comments close to the deadline, but overall the process was relatively fast, considering it was accepted in just over two months.

(0) Thank | lpflstt111

Research focus: Diabetes experience sharing: Does anyone know if this journal requires reviewers to be completed? My submission went from "under review" to "decision in process" after 20 days, and there is only one reviewer.

(0) Thank | 心意秋月

May I ask what your research focus is? I am also considering submitting to this journal, but I am afraid of encountering the same situation. Thank you.

(0) Thank | oliver1224

Update: 7.29 rejected. Our research group's paper submitted last year was also rejected due to the inability to find reviewers after submission.

(0) Thank | SereinCao

It has been a long time since this magazine has been reviewed, so I am here to update the progress. Submitted on 7.6, under review on 7.12, decision in process on 7.26, currently waiting for further results. Does it look normal? Absolutely not! Thanks to Elsevier for providing tracking services, I found out that the editor of this magazine invited 3 reviewers on the 12th, but did not receive a response. Then on the 18th, they marked the review as completed. I am truly speechless. Instead of continuing to invite reviewers or rejecting the submission in a timely manner, they have been stuck for almost ten days now, and are currently stuck in the decision in process stage. I have no idea how much longer it will take for the rejection.

(0) Thank | SereinCao

No reviewer has accepted, shall we withdraw the manuscript?

(0) Thank | 欧文卢西亚

Is it a warning journal?

(0) Thank | 一只鹏翼呀

The review process is extremely slow. After submitting, it remains "under review" for 3-4 months. After urging twice, they replied saying they couldn't find reviewers and asked for recommendations. After 6 months, the submission was rejected. If you are in a hurry, it is advised to carefully consider submitting.

(10) Thank | manfeng

The review process is extremely slow. After submitting the manuscript, it remained "under review" for 3-4 months. After following up twice, a response was received stating that they couldn't find reviewers and asking for recommendations. Six months later, the manuscript was rejected. If you are in a rush, consider carefully before submitting. If you don't follow up, it may be even slower, really wasting time

(0) Thank | 茂材mio

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Focused research direction: GDM
Experience sharing: Submitted in August 22, first round of minor revisions in December, returned for revisions at the end of December, accepted at the end of January. Although a bit slow, the entire process was relatively smooth

(0) Thank | Will Ellen

And then, what is the result now?

(0) Thank | 风陵千灵

So, how did it go for you in the end? I'm in a similar situation now

(0) Thank | 风陵千灵

Was it rejected later? Did you submit to another journal? I did the same, it seems unlikely, so sad

(0) Thank | 奉天尔安

Hi, how did it turn out in the end, the article you mentioned earlier? I'm curious about it

(0) Thank | 恒山安波

How did your article turn out in the end? I'm in the same situation now

(0) Thank | 恒山安波

On the second day, I have become a decision in process. Am I going to be rejected? ?

(0) Thank | 恒山安波

This is my third submission. I was accepted the first two times, but this time the processing speed of the manuscript has noticeably slowed down. It has been 3 weeks and the status is still "with editor."

(0) Thank | 德昌小公主

Oh, by the way, I don't think diabetes care, diabetologia, and nat prime did a very good job this year. Because they didn't even approach you for a manuscript.

(0) Thank | yikistudy