Almost all freestyle submissions with academic standards that meet the publication requirements need to be returned to the authors for revisions before publication, such as compressing the length of the article, redesigning tables, improving the quality of illustrations, and limiting the use of irregular abbreviations. However, returning the manuscript to the authors for revisions does not mean the article has been accepted. The final acceptance of the article depends on whether the modifications to the critical content and expression of the article made by the author meet the requirements of the reviewers and editors.

Materials typically returned to the authors for revisions include the original manuscript, reviewers' comments, and a covering letter from the editor. When authors receive the revised manuscript, they should first carefully read the covering letter and reviewers' comments. Then they should consider whether they can or are willing to accept the comments from the reviewers or editor and make modifications to the manuscript. The likelihood of the article being accepted can be seen from the response from the editor and the revised opinions of the reviewers. Revisions should not be rushed; authors should repeatedly read and understand the issues raised by the reviewers. Each comment from the reviewers should be answered individually, specific modifications in the revised manuscript should be indicated (page, lines), a letter should be sent to the editor, thanking them for their revision suggestions, and explaining the reasons for any areas that were not modified

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Submission completed - Format review - Editor preliminary review - Peer review - Review completed - Editor final review - Author revision

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the process of exchanging vows?

(0) Thank | 陶宜三岁啦

What is the process of peer review?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

Excuse me, is there a layout fee for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 火焰宁蒙