2020.04.04, submitted to journal; 2020.06.11, revised; 2020.07.08, revision submitted to journal; 2020.08.18, accept. The review time is basically about two months, which is quite fast. There were two reviewers, and one agreed (to accept it), and the other one required revision. Three days after acceptance, I filled out the publication agreement, and the article was proofread. Now, I am waiting for it to be published.

(1) Thank | Fance

Dec 14, 2019 Submitted to Journal; Dec 18, 2019 With Editor; May 03, 2020 Under Review; Jun 08, 2020 Revise; Jun 27, 2020 Revision Submitted to Journal; Jun 29, 2020 With Editor; Jun 30, 2020 Under Review; Jul 28, 2020 Revise; Jul 31, 2020 Revision Submitted to Journal; Aug 01, 2020 With Editor; Aug 04, 2020 With Editor; Aug 04, 2020 Accept. It is a research on particle mechanics. Several rounds of reviewers were changed in the middle, but the results were very good. I hope ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY will be better and better, and the impact factor can get higher and higher.

(6) Thank | 王二小勇斗SCI

19.07.19 submitted to journal, 19.07.29 under review, 19.08.22 under editor evaluation, 19.08.28 revised, 19.09.13 under review, 19.09.19 required reviews completed.

(2) Thank | Sam Zhang

This journal's impact factor has increased very quickly.  The speed of reviewing is average. From submission to revision to acceptance was about 6 months, with two reviews. The opinions given were very pertinent. After careful revision according to the reviewers’ comments, the editor considered the manuscript and it was not sent back to the reviewers. After two weeks, I received the good news that the manuscript was accepted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After rushing to complete the draft in the middle, I sent an email the next day, and then only invited experts to continue a month later.

(0) Thank | xssdd

Submitted on April 1, 2024, the manuscript underwent external review in less than half a month. The external review process lasted for a year, with four reminders for submission. Twelve reviewers were invited within the year. The manuscript was reviewed by experts on March 15, 2025, but was rejected by the editor on April 16, 2025. It's truly frustrating.

(0) Thank | xssdd

We have arrived, brothers.

(0) Thank | River_heang

9-5 Submit
10-22 Revise
10-30 Resubmit revised draft, with a request to revise the graphic and textual abstract
11-19 Revise, just a formatting issue
11-19 Resubmit

(0) Thank | 抽风的风

Hello, I would like to ask if after revising the graphics abstract strictly according to the author guidelines, should I email the editor through the submission page or through the submission email?

(0) Thank | 星星眨眼睛@

Hello, I would like to ask, after revising with the editor (strictly following the author guidelines to modify the graphical abstract), should I send an email to the editor above the submission page or should I send an email to the editor using the submission email?

(0) Thank | 星星眨眼睛@

Okay, thank you, thank you.

(0) Thank | 星星眨眼睛@

Generally, the revised content is sent to the editor via email.

(0) Thank | Connor1122

After I submitted the revisions for the APT journal, it has been in the "with editor" status without being sent for a second review. During this period, I made changes to the graphical abstract and sent it to the editor through the submission platform. Now I'm not sure how to proceed, has anyone else experienced this situation when submitting to this journal?

(0) Thank | 星星眨眼睛@

I reviewed for three months, but after making changes, my application was still rejected.

(0) Thank | 仍需努力-小赵

The manuscript has not been reviewed after seven months.

(0) Thank | 科研大小白

The direction is not in line, and they took me off for two weeks. During this time, they also asked me to change the format, create graphic summaries, adjust the line spacing. Two weeks later, they told me that the direction was not in line and rejected the submission.

(0) Thank | 树叶鱼

Strongly recommend avoiding this journal. They didn't even reply to my comments after two months. It's a garbage journal, don't submit your work there

(0) Thank | 啊啊啊啊啊

It's really slow, constantly asking for modifications to the graphical abstract

(0) Thank | 啊啊啊啊啊

One month with the editor, I'm gone. Is there any chance left? >_

(0) Thank | yuxiaozhou123

8.20 submit;
8.28 with editor
9.5   under review
9.12 under review
10.5 revise
10.31 revision resubmitted
11.1 with editor
11.11 accepted

(0) Thank | nk1231s

8.27 submitted to the journal
8.31 with editor
9.4 with editor
9.7 under review
10.4 revise (minor revision by two reviewers)
10.14 submitted to the journal
10.14 with editor (strictly following author guidelines, email, and graphic abstract requirements)
10.20 under review
10.24 accept
Less than two months, quite fast

(1) Thank | 我不是研究生

There may be issues with your article policy, such as the email address not being edu, or some things that do not comply with the author guidelines need to be corrected before the second revision, especially the email address; if it is not edu, it will not be processed. Take a look at the corresponding author's email (whether it was treated as spam by your teachers), they will notify you. I encountered such a problem, and it was instantly submitted for review after it was corrected

(0) Thank | 我不是研究生

The editor from South Korea

(0) Thank | airkiss

It has been a month and a half since the rework, and it is still in the "with editor" status, incredibly slow

(0) Thank | Nothing12

Which editor is it?

(0) Thank | 我不是研究生