The editor-in-chief responded very positively in each round, and it was worth recommending for submission. I misunderstood the semantics of the system. Generally, it is 3 months to be notified of the first reviewer's comments. There was an article of 9 months to be notified of the final review decision (decision made), and the other one of 6 months.

(0) Thank | JL

The journal is biased. Publishes research on information technology in the field of engineering and does not accept pure software theory and method research papers. Engineering applications include mechanical engineering, construction, civil engineering, manufacturing, etc., but does not include financial engineering. Four issues a year, each issue in recent years usually contains a special issue and regular papers, each accounting for 50%.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

August 11
(6, 3, 2)

(1) Thank | 彬彬

The rejection comments from AE are as follows: This study presents a [paper title]. The topic is interesting and may have some potential merits. The theme is more related to the MFG field. Therefore, I would recommend the authors to submit your work to more related journals.

(1) Thank | Talusul

Aug 08, 2025, With Editor;
Aug 09, 2025, Desk Reject.

(2) Thank | Talusul

I would like to ask if it is easy to reject now and then resubmit as a new manuscript? It seems that the reviewers are suggesting major revisions, but the editor does not allow any revisions.

(0) Thank | 真的不会

The 8:10 bus we took at 7:30, I forgot which one we chose. It's really slow.

(0) Thank | Chapter111

Aug 08, 2025, With Editor;

(0) Thank | Talusul

I have been through three rounds of review, and all the previous reviewers have left. Now there are all new reviewers.

(0) Thank | ChenWuc

How long does this journal give reviewers to review? It has been over a month for the second review and one reviewer has not completed their review yet.

(1) Thank | chenchenchen

Just submitted, the editor Wei Yan rejected it, and then pointed out: "your paper does not clearly present its incremental contribution against related literature by clarifying (1), (2), (3)." The email mentioned three aspects in which the paper did not meet the requirements. Is this a standard response? Did I miss any chance?

(0) Thank | 陈先生

How can I see how many times an editor has invited a reviewer?

(0) Thank | Let_paper

Perhaps I expressed myself incorrectly. Not accepting the invitation refers to consistently not responding. I have invited that reviewer in this direction three times.

(0) Thank | 圆卷卷19

What should we do if the editor didn't see the previous reviewers before the first invitation and then invited new ones after the deadline had passed?

(0) Thank | bestAccelerator

20241010 submit
20250501 rcc
20250504 major
20250610 submit
20250611 - now ur(6,1,1)

90% of the time was spent looking for reviewers, with two of them running away after the first review. The editor is very responsible and is now looking for the last one.

(0) Thank | leo99

2025.04.27 submitted to journal
2025.04.29 with editor
2025.05.16 under review
2025.06.06 required reviews completed
2025.06.07 decision in process
2025.06.09 minor revision
2025.06.13 submitted revised manuscript
2025.06.14 under review
2025.07.27 required reviews completed
2025.07.28 decision in process
2025.07.29 accepted
The second review took longer than expected, mainly because one of the reviewers consistently declined review invitations. The editor was diligent and sent multiple invitations every 10 days, and eventually, on the third attempt, the reviewer agreed.
Overall, the submission experience was good, with responsible Associate Editor and high efficiency.

(1) Thank | 圆卷卷19

Thank you!

(0) Thank | bestAccelerator

Please prioritize inviting previous reviewers.

(0) Thank | 吾日三省吾身

Thank you! Will new reviewers be invited for the revision?

(0) Thank | bestAccelerator

Are all three of them approved in the first trial, or is it two approvals and one rejection?

(0) Thank | 古神仁修

Does "reject and resubmit" mean having one reviewer recommend revisions while another recommends rejection?

(0) Thank | 古神仁修

This is a major renovation.

(0) Thank | 古神仁修

July 25 Submitted to Singapore editor
July 26 Under Review, 5 submissions accepted out of 2
P.S: After being rejected by aiaa for seven months, this speed is really impressive!

(1) Thank | 彬彬

Taylor Brothers, I submitted on the 15th, German editor, currently under review, 5 accepted 2.

(0) Thank | 吾日三省吾身

In April, I received the same result, which was a rejection on the system, but the email suggested resubmitting. I resubmitted after major revisions in June and was accepted directly in July. Feel free to make bold changes to your submission, it feels like there is no time limit for major revisions.

(0) Thank | dongzh