There were three reviewers for our most recent submission. One of the reviewers was a top editor for the journal; they recommended major revision, which were returned to us one month after submission. Overall, the review speed is relatively fast, the reviewers are professional and provide pertinent comments, and the amount of reviewer comments is large. All the reviewer’s comments significantly improved the quality of our article.

(6) Thank | pf

Have you received it now?

(0) Thank | PostgraduateW

Records:
2023-9-29 Sub to J
2023-9-30 With editor
2023-10-19 under Review

(0) Thank | 喜欢Accepted

Mainstream journals in geology, with constructive comments from the reviewers, have seen an improvement in the quality of the articles after revisions. However, the review process of well-established journals is relatively slow, taking a total of 20 months from submission to online publication. Some articles in this journal have a high quality and it is hoped that they will soon be included in the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

(0) Thank | Leslie

Posted in September 2020, the manuscript was reviewed by two well-known experts in the field. Their feedback was highly professional. In early November, they provided revision suggestions, which required substantial changes. Additional experiments were conducted to address the feedback, and the revisions were completed in January 2021. The revised manuscript was returned with feedback in March. After submitting it at the end of April, it was accepted without further revisions. The feedback received was highly professional, and the editor-in-chief was also very responsible.

(0) Thank | Geolimk

Assistant editor has not uploaded review files in time, dragging in the middle for more than 3 months

(0) Thank | cc

Manuscript has been submitted for two weeks. Why has it been in the editor's hands and the status has not changed?

(0) Thank | andrew

The review period is 3 months, a reviewer, Xiao Xiu directly received, but the late typesetting has not given a reply for a long time, I don't know why

(0) Thank | zhongyi@scsio.ac.cn

from submission to receive the modification notice for 6 months, a reviewer, evaluationIt is relatively high and will be acceptd one week after returning.

(0) Thank | 米明

This journal is a bit strange, the speed is very slow, the website is still crashing

(0) Thank | killer

modified three times before and after, two overhauls, after one year and twoMonth, finally received!

(3) Thank | justinocean

14 on December 11th.However, this must choose a review cycle, I will choose the current time.I feel that I am still a responsible journal. Because I have changed StatusDate 3 times in the middle, it is estimated that I am dealing with the reviewer's opinion.I don't understand either.Prayer papers can be good luck, reviewers can kindly help me to propose suggestions and opinions, let me publish a suitable job, and start to build a family to support the community to contribute to the community.Nnammtf.

(7) Thank | dd

Mainstream journal of marine geology.

(2) Thank | Anonymous