The first SCI article submitted in the summer vacation of the first-year graduate student. The article was submitted to the journal in Q2, I overestimated myself. There were 2 reviewers, the comments raised by one of them were very convincing. Let me transfer it to other journals after revision. It seems that I am not suitable for scientific research.

(5) Thank | 大聪明

My first SCI paper was published in this periodical. The initial review period was about four months long. After I addressed the revisions suggested by the reviewers, I resubmitted the revised manuscript and went through two more iterations of minor edits. It was about 12 months from submission to publication. Even though it took around one year to get published, I will submit to this journal again. The impact factor has increased slightly in the past year.

(0) Thank | Miranda2900

As usual, it will be delivered after minor repairs.

(0) Thank | cc流川枫

There is no news, it has been over two months since I submitted it back, this editor is really frustrating.

(0) Thank | 伟少小狄

My situation is the same, may I ask if yours has yielded results?

(0) Thank | hhzzer

Can we report it? After minor revisions, it will be resubmitted to the reviewer. Isn't this considered "cheating"?

(0) Thank | 伟少小狄

The second review completed the response and revision of comments from three reviewers. All reviewers agreed to accept the revisions. The editor requested three to five minor revisions to correct grammar and format. After five rounds of revisions, the journal's status changed to "STJ 60 days." The editor then invited seven new reviewers. Feeling frustrated, the author considered withdrawing the submission. It seems like a waste of time to submit to this low-quality journal. For those hoping to get published, be prepared to wait for at least two years for the editor to play games with you!!!

(0) Thank | 梦幻泡影

The third revision was returned on April 15th, and it has been almost two months. The editing speed is really impressive.

(0) Thank | 伟少小狄

Just submitted, based on the number I estimated, the acceptance rate is not more than 5%. Is this journal so outrageous? Lower than most top-tier TRANS in zone 1.

(0) Thank | Shawn Yue

"The revision submitted to the journal has been over 40 days now, and there has been no response."

(0) Thank | syno

Has there been any change in the status of our submission? It has been a month and a half since the third review.

(0) Thank | 伟少小狄

Brother, you also need to submit.

(0) Thank | 飞机起飞白羊

Please record:
2025.5.20 submit
2025.5.26 submit

(0) Thank | xiaohu_D

5.19 提交
5.26 提交

Translation:
5.19 submit
5.26 submit

(0) Thank | 飞机起飞白羊

Make a note of it.

(0) Thank | Dongzhe Yang

The first revision was made, both of the two reviewers accepted it, the editor requested minor revisions, and after the third revision the editor requested more minor revisions. It has been almost a month since it was sent back. Kind of speechless.

(0) Thank | 伟少小狄

It's been 3 months since the revision was sent back, and it's still with the editor... Why is it taking so long? I hope for a good result.

(0) Thank | 星空薄荷

I am in the same situation. It has been like this since April 10th. What's going on?

(0) Thank | guNan

2025.5.7 Under Review

(0) Thank | YJL

May I ask how the situation is now? Mine is also the same.

(0) Thank | llllmm

The situation is the same, but the status has not changed after submitting the fourth modification.

(1) Thank | 灬lemon

Apr 15, 2025 STJ	Apr 22, 2025 WE

(0) Thank | YJL

0425 submit

请问您是指提交0425吗？

(0) Thank | zzzxyb

I also submitted in November last year, but the first review has not been completed yet.

(0) Thank | ad123

The second reviewer suggested acceptance, and the editor said they would be willing to accept after language modifications, giving a minor revision. It was the first time in their life that they had used a paper editing service to polish their paper, and after one month, they received another minor revision for language formatting and content. After making the changes, it was sent for external review again. Is it common for there to be three rounds of reviews?

(0) Thank | Cfamine