The timelines for your information: 6.17, submission. Sent for review on the same day. During the period, the status changed to editor evaluation. 8.7, the review comments of the first review were received. There were 3 review experts, one accepted it directly, one gave some detailed suggestions, and another one rejected it from the starting point of the article and gave a lot of questions about the research background that can be answered in the introduction (should be against my tutor, embarrassing me on purpose); 8.17, the reply to (the comments of) first review was returned, and it was sent for review on the same day; 9.16, the comments of the second review were received, the third reviewer still had some skeptical questions about the source of the research background; 9.16, the reply to (the comments of) second review was returned, and it was sent for review on the same day; 9.24, the notice of acceptance was received. Overall, I feel that the journal is very efficient in sending the articles for review and processing, and the quality of this journal is also not low.

(3) Thank | xbh

Timelines for your reference. 2019.7.7 submission; 2019.9.23 reviewer comments returned, requiring major revision within 2 months; here is one thing to say is that both reviewers expressed interest in the article and did not have too complicated comments. 2019.10.29 first revision submitted; 2019.12.19 comments for the first revision received, the No. 1 reviewer basically did not have any comments, only mentioned a few problems of figure numbers, etc. At this time, a lot of new opinions (that was not included in the first opinion) were suddenly raised by the No. 2 reviewer. 2020.1.25 second revision returned; 2020.3.14 comments for the second revision received. At this time, the No. 1 reviewer "recommended publication", and the No. 2 reviewer made a mistake in the manuscript, so we communicated with the editor, and a week later on March 30, the editor separately sent comments from the No. 2 reviewer. He still put forward a lot of comments. At this moment, I was a little worried. After replying one by one, I returned to the third revision on 2020.4.23. 2020.5.29 notification of acceptance received by email. The overall review process is still very fast. My 10-month period is equivalent to four rounds of review, which is not easy.

(7) Thank | 万物归藏

The editorial office has a very high processing efficiency, and a few time points are listed here for your reference! Submitted on September 19, 2018; first review comments returned on November 5, 2018; revised manuscript submitted on December 24, 2018; second review comments returned on February 7, 2019; the second revised manuscript submitted on March 7, 2019; accepted on April 8, 2019; online on April 13, 2019. Due to our own reasons, we didn’t revise it properly in the first time, which caused a second review and delayed the time. Generally speaking, it was processed quickly. Thanks for the hard work of the editorial office and reviewers! Thanks for LetPub’s assistance in the submission! My first article was finally accepted.

(4) Thank | 梦之蓝

Overall, this journal is credible and quick to review. I had three reviewers for my paper; two recommended that the paper be accepted and one recommended that it be rejected… got accepted! Yay for majority rules.

(4) Thank | Anonymous

20241120 Submitted / With editor
20241121 Under review
20241231 Required Reviews Completed
20250102 Revise
20250227 Revisions being processed
20250421 Decision in process / Accept

The editor responded promptly, feedback could be received almost on the same day; because the topic is relatively niche, the opinions of the two reviewers (presumably compatriots) were not very relevant, but still difficult to change; the revision period coincided with the Spring Festival, so it took two months to submit the revisions; after the revisions, it seems to have caught up with the busy season for our researchers, so we are truly grateful to the reviewers for taking the time to re-review our manuscript. In recent years, the quality of CG's output has been good, and we hope that everyone's submissions will be fruitful ^_^*

(0) Thank | hanfeiwork

Everyone for me, I for everyone.

(0) Thank | 李——

The second one has been under review for a month now, I don't know what the result will be, so I can only wait.

(0) Thank | ZYS

Same question, where can I check the review status?

(0) Thank | ZWY-

Submitted to Journal: 2024-02-26
With Editor: 2024-02-28
Under Review: 2024-02-29
Rejected: 2024-03-30

(0) Thank | nature副主编

Where can I see how many reviewers have approved the review? It cannot be found in the official account, and there is no link for checking the status of the paper.

(0) Thank | peridynamic

I had two reviewers at that time.

(0) Thank | ForsakenMe

I have sent out 3, one is under review, and the remaining two have no updates, not sure if they will continue to be sent.

(0) Thank | ZYS

I am now also, one month to complete a review, and then sent for another month, still not found, just directly ended the review.

(0) Thank | 南充

Several reviewers.

(0) Thank | 南充

Great, the submission was sent for review the day after it was submitted, and it took about 2 months to receive feedback for major revisions. The acceptance came about a month later.

(0) Thank | ForsakenMe

1. Submitted for review the day after the beginning of September, 2. Revised for about a month, with two reviewers, one minor revision and one major revision, 3. After the second round of review, one acceptance and one minor revision, with the editor suggesting a major revision, 4. Accepted the day after the mid-January 2025 revision. The reviewers were very professional and the manuscript was sent to experts who understood my research area well, their feedback was extremely valuable, thank you!

(0) Thank | zlf

I have been waiting for 3 months and still haven't received any response, does anyone have a similar situation?

(0) Thank | RichieYam

How do you feel about the suggestions for the major repair? I feel like my suggestions are numerous and challenging, I don't know how likely they are to be implemented.

(0) Thank | 小佩

It was really fast, taking less than two months from submission to acceptance (with major revisions required after the first review).

(0) Thank | 小朱佩奇开飞机

A very good journal, the editorial department is very efficient, and the two reviewers provided many constructive suggestions for revisions, which greatly helped improve the quality of the paper. The paper was in the hands of the editorial department for no more than a day, so the review period depends on the speed of the reviewers.

(0) Thank | yang_k

Original poster, just wanted to ask, how soon will the content be posted online after being hired?

(0) Thank | 千与千寻福尔摩斯

Hello, may I ask if this journal has online first publishing? If so, how long does it usually take?

(0) Thank | 千与千寻福尔摩斯

The most speechless journal of the year, although the speed is very fast, the opinions of one reviewer came back in one month, the editor continued to send it for review and find other reviewers. It was rejected in the afternoon after being sent for review in the morning. There were two reasons for rejection, one was that they could not find reviewers, and the other was based on the opinion of the first reviewer (the first reviewer had no negative comments, the only suggestion was to improve the clarity of the images and language refinement).

(0) Thank | CASS9.1

High demands are placed on the innovation of the article.

(0) Thank | 1

A very good journal, response within one month, minor revisions accepted.

(0) Thank | 1