The review cycle for your information: 2019.10.24, submission; 2019.4.1, major revision; 2020.5.9, the major revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.2, moderate revision; 2020.6.7, the moderate revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.9, accept. I submitted an article on machine learning in agricultural remote sensing. The reviewers were very professional, and the editor were very responsible, and the manuscript was processed quickly. The review speed was faster than imagination. It is estimated that the impact factor will rise, I hope Clinical & Experimental Allergy gets better and better. 1) It took a long time for the first review; it was mainly because that it took a long time for inviting suitable reviewers; 2) Clinical & Experimental Allergy required the length of the manuscript to be as concise as possible, and it was mainly to shorten the length in the moderate revision required in the second review; 3) The editor emphasized that only the closely related references should be cited, and he didn’t like a lot of citations without plan.

(12) Thank | 张先森加油吖

Submission period for your reference: 2020.1.21 submission; 2020.3.4 major revision required; 2020.4.9 major revision submitted; 2020.5.5 minor revision required; 2020.5.9 Minor revision submitted; 2020.5.11 accepted; 2020.5.21 Proof; 2020.5.26 Online. I submitted an article on the application of artificial intelligence in agricultural remote sensing. The reviewers are quite professional, and the questions raised are sharp and detailed. (The result of the first review was a headache, and really hard to address!) The editor is very responsible and the manuscript is processed very quickly. The reviewing speed of CEA is much faster than in previous years. The impact factor of the journal is rising. I hope CEA will do better! Several complains: 1) The submission requirement clearly indicates "your paper your way". I followed the standard Trans formatting, and was required to resubmit three times by the editor due to formatting issues. In the end, it was formatted as single-column and double-spaced... 2) Late in the process, the proof is very slow. I remember that all my other papers were proofed on the second day of acceptance, but it was delayed for ten days in CEA.

(14) Thank | 那小子真坏

2019-5-5 Submission; 2019- 6-15 major revise; 2019-8-8 revised submission; 2019-10-2 under decision; 2019-10-18 accept. Generally speaking, it is quite fast. The manuscript was under review within a week or so after submission. The editor is very responsible, and the advice experts gave was also very professional. We carefully revised one by one according to the review comments, and replied one by one. It was the first time for me to write a SCI paper, and I am very happy to see it was accepted by Computer. I hope everyone will succussed in submission.

(10) Thank | 东河

All of the reviewer’s opinions and comments were pertinent and directly aided in improving the content of the article, the outline of the experiment and the writing. In general, to get into this journal, your research has to involve a relatively new method. The review speed is very fast, and the reviewers and editors are also very professional.

(4) Thank | TYNCASIA

2025/06/13 sub
2025/06/14 WE

(0) Thank | SuperBob

June 6, 2025 SJ
June 9, 2025 WE
June 11, 2025 UR (Three reviewers approved the review on the same day
...The process was very fast. Blessings. Blessings. Blessings.)

(0) Thank | Louis

It's not easy, it took nearly 13 months to be accepted. At the beginning of the month, I was thinking, since it had already been delayed for several months, a few days ago I urged with a try attitude, and the editor actually accepted it after making minor revisions without finding a new reviewer. The final result is good. Thanks to editor Ferdous Sohel, wish everyone's submission to be successful!

(0) Thank | haha

5.18 WE

(0) Thank | hhyhhyzlh

How many reviewers are there in the first round of external review?

(0) Thank | 李文罡

How many reviewers are there in your first round of external review?

(0) Thank | 李文罡

It is difficult to find a reviewer, it took four months to find the second reviewer.

(0) Thank | czheng

Luck was on our side, and the external audit was completed within a month.

(0) Thank | jyx

Has it been so long from under review to rrc? Did the reviewer change or more reviewers added in between?

(0) Thank | zseason

It's been almost a month since we submitted for review, and within two weeks, two reviewers accepted the review. It's been over twenty days since the reviewers started reviewing, why hasn't one of them finished yet? Please don't disappear!

(0) Thank | zseason

Excuse me, after running away for so long, did you eventually get sent for trial? Or did you just DIP directly?

(0) Thank | ddxt

One month later, time has changed but the situation remains the same. We are still the same. What is going on?

(0) Thank | Kayou

2024.8.20 submitted
2024.10.20 under review
2025.3.10 rrc
2025.3.12 major revision
2025.4.17 under review
2025.5.12 rrc
2025.5.14 accepted
First time submission, lucked out with a major revision being accepted directly. Hope the journal continues to improve.

(0) Thank | czheng

Did you finish reviewing within a month?

(0) Thank | 李文罡

2025.05.15 完成必要的审核。

(0) Thank | jyx

I was quite lucky to be able to get published in this journal. I had originally submitted to several journals with lower levels of prestige and had been rejected. Finally, I decided to try this journal thinking that it wouldn't hurt to be rejected one more time.

I submitted on 24.12.5 and it took about a month to receive under review status. 9 reviewers were invited, 3 accepted the review invitation. 

I received a major revision request on 25.2.22 and submitted the revised version on 25.3.21. 

On 25.4.19, I received under review status again. 2 reviewers accepted the review invitation but the third one did not respond. 

Finally on 25.5.11, I received an acceptance. I thanked the editor for the opportunity.

My editor took around 3 weeks to a month to respond each time. Overall, the experience was not bad. I was surprised that my submission was even considered for review. I wish the journal continued success.

(1) Thank | HWQHU

Would it be faster to process if other journals recommend transfer?

(0) Thank | 一条咸鱼

It's not an isolated case. The last time I postponed for over a year, I managed to hold on and didn't withdraw, but in the end, I had to defer.

(0) Thank | 牛头人-麦麦提

Is withdrawing a submission directly emailing the editor for withdrawal?

(0) Thank | god

Accepted on April 30, 2025, with 5 rounds of review taking over 9 months, extremely slow.

(1) Thank | COOKIES7887

Due to the word limit, I have sent a picture.

Proceed with caution!!! Extremely slow!!!

Withdrawn!

(2) Thank | Kai