The review cycle for your information: 2019.10.24, submission; 2019.4.1, major revision; 2020.5.9, the major revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.2, moderate revision; 2020.6.7, the moderate revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.9, accept. I submitted an article on machine learning in agricultural remote sensing. The reviewers were very professional, and the editor were very responsible, and the manuscript was processed quickly. The review speed was faster than imagination. It is estimated that the impact factor will rise, I hope Clinical & Experimental Allergy gets better and better. 1) It took a long time for the first review; it was mainly because that it took a long time for inviting suitable reviewers; 2) Clinical & Experimental Allergy required the length of the manuscript to be as concise as possible, and it was mainly to shorten the length in the moderate revision required in the second review; 3) The editor emphasized that only the closely related references should be cited, and he didn’t like a lot of citations without plan.

(12) Thank | 张先森加油吖

Submission period for your reference: 2020.1.21 submission; 2020.3.4 major revision required; 2020.4.9 major revision submitted; 2020.5.5 minor revision required; 2020.5.9 Minor revision submitted; 2020.5.11 accepted; 2020.5.21 Proof; 2020.5.26 Online. I submitted an article on the application of artificial intelligence in agricultural remote sensing. The reviewers are quite professional, and the questions raised are sharp and detailed. (The result of the first review was a headache, and really hard to address!) The editor is very responsible and the manuscript is processed very quickly. The reviewing speed of CEA is much faster than in previous years. The impact factor of the journal is rising. I hope CEA will do better! Several complains: 1) The submission requirement clearly indicates "your paper your way". I followed the standard Trans formatting, and was required to resubmit three times by the editor due to formatting issues. In the end, it was formatted as single-column and double-spaced... 2) Late in the process, the proof is very slow. I remember that all my other papers were proofed on the second day of acceptance, but it was delayed for ten days in CEA.

(14) Thank | 那小子真坏

2019-5-5 Submission; 2019- 6-15 major revise; 2019-8-8 revised submission; 2019-10-2 under decision; 2019-10-18 accept. Generally speaking, it is quite fast. The manuscript was under review within a week or so after submission. The editor is very responsible, and the advice experts gave was also very professional. We carefully revised one by one according to the review comments, and replied one by one. It was the first time for me to write a SCI paper, and I am very happy to see it was accepted by Computer. I hope everyone will succussed in submission.

(10) Thank | 东河

All of the reviewer’s opinions and comments were pertinent and directly aided in improving the content of the article, the outline of the experiment and the writing. In general, to get into this journal, your research has to involve a relatively new method. The review speed is very fast, and the reviewers and editors are also very professional.

(4) Thank | TYNCASIA

So fast, I submitted it in June last year, and it was only accepted at the end of last month. One reviewer hasn't looked at the reply to the second review for 8 months.

(0) Thank | STBCK

My review has been over for more than 20 days. Yesterday the deadline was updated, but the status has not changed. I wonder how much longer it will take?

(0) Thank | zseason

The most authentic evaluation on the entire network: Submitted on 2025.1.21, it took nearly two months with the editor. Returned from the laboratory on 5.21, with two minor revisions and one major revision. Returned on 6.18, with another minor revision. Accepted on 7.14. It took about half a year, and the research content is CFD atomization simulation (VOF TO DPM), which is closely related to the journal's specialized paper direction. If you are confident in the quality of your paper, you can submit it. However, there is a risk, but there will be rewards. The journal is quite powerful, and there are not many journals in the field of agricultural engineering machinery. The two minor revisions had no complicated opinions from the reviewers. The reviewer of the major revision is probably a peer expert or doctoral student, who provided quite powerful opinions on the technical aspects, logic, expression, details, etc. of the paper. Respect to them! Finally, I hope everyone can excel in their papers!

(1) Thank | 杨凌下小雨

2025.7.28, dip, probably have to say goodbye...

(0) Thank | 抹了油的猪

I started submitting articles in mid-January and up to now, July 28th, I have not received any feedback. I have followed up twice in between and invited 21 reviewers, of which 2 accepted but have not provided any feedback so far.

(0) Thank | 攀登

Please translate the following paragraph into English:。。。

(0) Thank | skaoch

7.8 SJ
7.9 WE

请问这两个短语是否有特定的背景或上下文？因为这两个短语本身并没有明确的含义或内容，无法准确翻译。

(0) Thank | 秦梦婷

Really busy! It has been a month.

(0) Thank | accpact

I hope to accelerate faster~~

(0) Thank | 抹了油的猪

Record the submission process
July 14, 2025  SJ
July 16, 2025  WE

(1) Thank | 抹了油的猪

7.22 dipped GG SMD~

(0) Thank | 聪明的咚咚锵

Can I request an expedited review for this journal? It has been two and a half months since submission, with UR approaching 50 days. Two manuscripts are under review, but only one has been completed without inviting additional reviewers. Will requesting an expedited review result in rejection?

(0) Thank | 一条咸鱼

May I ask what is the current status of the paper?

(0) Thank | syh211

Too fast, isn't it?

(0) Thank | 岁月静好

July 19, 2025 With Editor

(0) Thank | 聪明的咚咚锵

6.26 rc
7.10 major revision
7.19 we

(1) Thank | Louis

Excuse me, did you experience a dip after your RRC? I had an RC after my RRC, and then a dip, does that mean it's going to cool down?

(0) Thank | zseason

Fast is fast, but the topic is not within the scope of the journal. It is suggested to transfer to another top journal in the same field (Field Crops Research) or to their new journal (Smart Agricultural Technology, not yet indexed in SCI). The editor suggests submitting to their special issue on remote sensing technology, as the paper falls under remote sensing applications.

(0) Thank | 小马不说话

Record the second impact compag
7.18 Submitted to Journal

(0) Thank | 聪明的咚咚锵

4.22 Reviewer feedback, WE
4.23 UR
5.12 RRC
5.13 Major Revision
5.27 Reviewer feedback, we
5.29 UR
7.15 RRC
7.18 Minor Revision

After two major revisions, it finally became a minor revision. The reviewer who took over in the middle did not provide feedback for a month, which was really frustrating.

(0) Thank | 虔诚之歌

For over a month, the same reviewer has been reviewing the manuscript, but still no decision has been made. The editor also hasn't invited new reviewers. It's frustrating.

(0) Thank | Pei·Chen