The opponents mentioned that Applied Mathematical Modelling = 2*CMAME, which really made me laugh. AMM is known for the valueless papers it published. That is not convincing at all to say so. Pass. Next one, please start your show to entertain us.

(30) Thank | hydraul

Two months after submission, the comments of first review were returned, and it was accepted on the next day after revision. With the accumulation of the pioneers in 1970s and 1980s, there are many pioneering works, so it is inevitable that the self-citation rate is relatively high. The editor is an expert in the field of dynamics. The reviewers pay attentions to the innovation of the research, and are very rigorous in mathematics. Therefore, it helped a lot in improving the article.

(35) Thank | tjuasia

There is no doubt that this is the top publications of computational mechanics. A few authors stop talking nonsense here. I submitted it several times. This was the first one. The reviewers were very careful and conscientious. Some of the details were described very vaguely while it was easily saw through by reviewers. The review questions raised were very professional and very helpful to the article.

(34) Thank | 苦逼的搬砖狗

This journal seriously exaggerates its metrics. No joke. First, the self-citation rate is relatively high, and it is well-known that they inflate their impact factor. I am a doctoral student in the Department of Mechanics of Tsinghua University. I refuse to accept that JMPS is the top mechanics journal, followed by IJP and then IJES. I know this is a Euro journal, but honestly all these journals can’t be ranked appropriately. I mean, this journal should be ranked about 5th. Yeah, I mean this journal is much easier to get accepted in over other journals.

(0) Thank | 嫦娥一曲

6.1 submit a manuscript, and it will be sent to reviewers directly on 6.11, with reviewers accepting the task on the same day.

(0) Thank | HB666

Have you been feeling down recently?

(0) Thank | ghbnewr

What's the situation of the original poster now? Can you share it?

(0) Thank | Yitao Fang

Have you ever felt like Alessandro Reali, the editor, hasn't even reviewed the submission? It's been a week and it's still STJ.

(0) Thank | Yitao Fang

6.1 until now is still stj

(0) Thank | HB666

Hello, may I ask how are you doing now? I also invested on May 26th and have the same editor. I am still holding STJ at the moment.

(0) Thank | Ziwei Yan

Please submit the following passage to English: 5.31提交

(0) Thank | dahdj

It's a bit uncomfortable.

(0) Thank | dahdj

I also chose him...

(0) Thank | 十三的Yogurt

5.28 提交

Translation: 5.28 SUBMIT

(0) Thank | dahdj

Everyone in the comment section is quite fast, it's really strange. Alessandro Reali, the editor I chose.

(0) Thank | dahdj

I submitted it on the 19th, and it has been "submit" ever since.

(0) Thank | 十三的Yogurt

2025 5.22 submission
2025 5.26 submission

Has anyone encountered this situation of not being able to connect with the editor?

(0) Thank | dahdj

Hi, have you received the review comments? How many reviewers' comments have you returned?

(0) Thank | 努力冲冲冲

Hi, there are also three of us handling the submissions. How many people's review comments did you receive?

(0) Thank | 努力冲冲冲

Hey buddy, how's it going with your submission? I submitted yesterday morning and got a decision in the afternoon, but I haven't received a rejection yet. I'm already thinking about which journal to submit to next.

(0) Thank | 园田真理老公

Is there any follow-up? I am in the same situation as well.

(0) Thank | mmnltkcg

Is there any follow-up? It's the same situation.

(0) Thank | mmnltkcg

Excuse me, I submitted my paper on May 6th, but it still shows as "Submitted to Journal". How come you also submitted on May 6th and already went to "With Editor" on the 7th?

(0) Thank | 咋搞捏？

Record:
25.05.06 submit to journal
25.05.07 with editor

(0) Thank | Tupo

4.17 still dip, waiting for the coolness

(0) Thank | wwwwz