One week after it was sent for review, it was returned to revise due to the format was incorrect. The first review took one month, and a major revision was required. The two reviewers gave quite pertinent opinions. It was submitted one and a half months later, and the second review results returned in four months, and it was accepted. I don’t know why it took a long time for the second review. Perhaps experts returned their opinions slowly. The editor is very responsible, and the processing speed of other steps is very fast. It worth submitting.

(1) Thank | adu814

The reviewers were not professional and made the review comments without reading the article content carefully, and turned a blind eye to the existing content when reviewing, or with personal inclinations. The degree to which opinions are critical is abhorrent. The editor made nonstandard operation. There were four reviewers in the first review, and two more were added in the third review, and the previous four still recommended accepting it. Now, it is under the fourth review, the future is uncertain, I suggest you be cautious.

(15) Thank | methory

The editor-in-chief of the journal is relatively responsible, not dilatory. Basically, revision was required for the incorrect format after submission. It was directly assigned to the deputy editor-in-chief after passing the first review. It is recommended to read the description of format carefully before submitting. The review speed is not slow. The overall difficulty is not great.

(16) Thank | kongzhi

Can it still be rejected after submission?

(0) Thank | kkkkkkkris

Got refused in late July.

(0) Thank | f2018

Share your timeline:
November 2024 submitted to journal
January 2025 with editor
February 2025 under review
May 2025 under review with ten invited reviewers
June 2025 two reviewers completed their reviews
Mid-June 2025 four reviewers completed their reviews, requesting major revisions to be completed within three weeks
July 2025 submitted the revised manuscript
End of July 2025 manuscript accepted

(0) Thank | testooo

Do you have a latex template available?

(0) Thank | Eowyndd

Has the renovation been submitted for approval? How long do we have to wait?

(0) Thank | zeqwewqds

2.5 submitted for review, with editor in March, and sent for review on May 17th.

(0) Thank | zeqwewqds

2025.06.21 submitted
2025.07.22 with editor
This is too slow. How long does it usually take to go from "submitted" to "under review"?

(0) Thank | kkkkkkkris

My application was also rejected, citing lack of innovation.

(0) Thank | sealoong

I heard that CMPB is currently very slow as a whole. When I submitted last July, it was very fast, taking two months from submission to acceptance, even with two rounds of revisions in between. The handling associate editor at that time was Oliver Faust, who may be a more conscientious and responsible editor.

(0) Thank | xiaoxxkid

Everyone is so slow.

(0) Thank | gbbe

On January 21, 2025, the manuscript was submitted to the journal. It was with the editor for over two months, with numerous reminders in between, as the handling editor seemed to have disappeared.

On February 20, 2025, it was under review and three reviewers were invited, but none accepted the invitation.

On April 30, 2025, it was still under review, with the number of invited reviewers increased to five, and finally two accepted the review.

On June 6, 2025, it was sent for further review.

On June 13, 2025, the first round of comments were received, giving three weeks to make revisions.

On June 30, 2025, the revised manuscript was submitted.

As of July 21, 2025, it has been three weeks since submission of the revised manuscript, and it remains in the "with editor" status, with the handling editor seemingly disappearing again.

(0) Thank | kerberos

May I ask who your deputy editor is?

(0) Thank | 周周11

Translation: Over 20 manuscripts have been submitted for review intermittently.

(0) Thank | f2018

How many reviewers have accepted the review now? The journal I Love Seville has only received 5 reviews.

(0) Thank | zeqwewqds

7.10 still under review

It's been almost half a year since it was submitted on 1.27, and the first review still hasn't come back.

(0) Thank | f2018

Is this journal open access?

(0) Thank | Dereckl

After submitting for two months, the formal review process took about a month before the editors decided whether to proceed with peer review. After being sent for peer review, the feedback came back in about half a month, and it took ten days to make revisions. The second round of minor revisions only took about 10 days to review. So far, it has taken about two months in total.

(0) Thank | 蒋大帅

Found it, boss!!!

(0) Thank | 浦东吴彦祖

Thank you for your reply. It's the first time I've known that it can be checked like this. How is the progress of your paper now? How long does it usually take to come back after review? How many reviewers are there?

(0) Thank | phoebe0978

Thank you for your response. It's the first time I've known that you can check like this. How is the progress of your paper now, and approximately how long will it take for the review to come back?

(0) Thank | phoebe0978

After entering the "under review" stage, you can track the progress of the review through WeChat, where you can see the invitation and acceptance status of the reviewers.

(1) Thank | kerberos

25.7.04 ur

Translation: July 25th, 2004 your

(0) Thank | 浦东吴彦祖