One week after it was sent for review, it was returned to revise due to the format was incorrect. The first review took one month, and a major revision was required. The two reviewers gave quite pertinent opinions. It was submitted one and a half months later, and the second review results returned in four months, and it was accepted. I don’t know why it took a long time for the second review. Perhaps experts returned their opinions slowly. The editor is very responsible, and the processing speed of other steps is very fast. It worth submitting.

(1) Thank | adu814

The reviewers were not professional and made the review comments without reading the article content carefully, and turned a blind eye to the existing content when reviewing, or with personal inclinations. The degree to which opinions are critical is abhorrent. The editor made nonstandard operation. There were four reviewers in the first review, and two more were added in the third review, and the previous four still recommended accepting it. Now, it is under the fourth review, the future is uncertain, I suggest you be cautious.

(15) Thank | methory

The editor-in-chief of the journal is relatively responsible, not dilatory. Basically, revision was required for the incorrect format after submission. It was directly assigned to the deputy editor-in-chief after passing the first review. It is recommended to read the description of format carefully before submitting. The review speed is not slow. The overall difficulty is not great.

(16) Thank | kongzhi

I am two months old.

(0) Thank | zgmzsjd

Please translate the following paragraph into English: WE

(0) Thank | 小孩听雨

The manuscript number is 3000, but only less than 200 are accepted in a year, with a pitifully low acceptance rate.

(0) Thank | zdj2003

What is the correct format? Double spacing and wide margins.

(0) Thank | lchen1206

31 days have passed, and there has been no movement.

(0) Thank | 小孩听雨

Feel sorry for your brother, but for this reason...

(0) Thank | sealoong

2025.02.21 sent for review.
Still in the under review status.

Reviews completed: 1 within the same day as sent review invitations.
Review invitations accepted: 2 accepted invitation after two weeks, still not completed.
Review invitations sent: 2 

One reviewer accepted and completed review on the same day which means is our manuscript rejected?
Other reviewer still reviewing, not submit the review.

Can anyone give any comments??

(0) Thank | AA

The first and second reviews are particularly slow. Unable to find reviewers, it is even slower this year. If the editor likes this article, the third review will be very fast.

(0) Thank | p小于0.01

Submission Experience Sharing:
2024.07.25: Submitted to journal
2024.08.10: With editor
2024.08.20: Under review
2025.05.10: Major revision
2025.05.20: Returned for revisions, back to under review on the same day
2025.05.21: Accepted

(0) Thank | p小于0.01

2024.12.23 submitted
2025.02.16 with editor
2025.02.21 under review
2025.05.23 under review

(3) Thank | AS

It's been almost a month, do I have to wait for over a month just to catch a glimpse?

(0) Thank | 小孩听雨

1 month and 6 days have been rejected, the reason being the current volume of submissions is high and the lack of innovation.

(0) Thank | 接Accept版

It's too slow. It's been 33 days now.

(1) Thank | 接Accept版

May 14th, still waiting for STJ, let's continue waiting.

(0) Thank | 浮生酒醒

The speed is too slow, please be cautious if you are in a hurry to submit. Submissions take more than 3 months to enter the "under review" stage.

2025.1.21 submitted to journal
2025.2.20 with editor - Reminded numerous times but unable to contact handling editor through English customer service
2025.4.30 under review - Invited 3 reviewers, none have accepted the invitation so far, and editor has not continued to invite new reviewers.

(0) Thank | kerberos

So the editor actually saw it, but didn't address it? It has been stuck in STJ for a while, I'm really frustrated.

(0) Thank | 接Accept版

How are you doing? WD hasn't responded. It's been 26 days for me, and it's still the same.

(0) Thank | 接Accept版

2025.03.20 Submit
2025.03.24 Returned for formatting and content revision
2025.03.31 Resubmitted to stj
2025.04.7 Waiting for review
2025.5.11 Under review

(0) Thank | 浦东吴彦祖

It's been three months and still with the editor. The rejection from the same group for this journal last year was quite quick.

(0) Thank | zeqwewqds

How is it going? The investment I made on April 25th still hasn't shown any movement.

(0) Thank | biliybiliy

4.25投, also STJ.

(0) Thank | biliybiliy

So slow.

(0) Thank | xiaoshudian