Submitted on March 30th, with editor for 35 days; May 5th, under review; May 20th, required review completed. Then we waited for half a month. It was estimated that the editor invited a new reviewer; June 5th, major revision required; July 3rd, revision submitted; July 12th, accepted; July 25th, online. It was the first time that I submitted to this journal. It took 3.5 months from submission to acceptance. Editor-in-chief Wang Hao said in the email notifying the acceptance, “JCOMB has obtained an ISI Impact Factor of 7.635. We are targeting to raise its impact factor to 10.”

(14) Thank | WGWG

received 9 August 2018; accepted 5 September 2018; received 12 August 2018; accepted 21 August 2018; received 12 August 2018; accepted 23 August 2018; received 12 august 2018; accepted 23 August 2018; received 12 August 2018; accepted 2 September 2018; received 12 August 2018; accepted 5 September 2018.

(2) Thank | dandandan

Sep 26, 2019 submitted to journal; Oct 16, 2019 major revision; Nov 1, 2019 revised to journal; Nov 23, 2019 major revision; Dec 12, 2019 revised to journal; Dec 31, 2019 with editor; Jan 8, 2020 rejected. Two reviewers, who were very professional, provided a lot of in-depth opinions, and corrected many details, which are very helpful to the improvement of the paper. For papers with less than 7,000 words, the reviewer's comments given exceeded 4 pages, which was close to 2,000 words. The comments were very tricky. They pointed out the core insufficiency of the paper at a glance. If it was revised according to the opinions, it was possible to be accepted by an IF 10 journal. Just gather myself and revise it.

(1) Thank | 肉屠夫

Received on 9 August 2018; Accepted on 5 September 2018; Received on 12 August 2018; Accepted on 21 August 2018; Received on 12 August 2018; Accepted on 23 August 2018; Received on 12 August 2018; Accepted on 23 August 2018; Received on 12 August 2018; Accepted on 2 September 2018; Received on 12 August 2018; Accepted on 5 September 2018.

(0) Thank | dandandan

Look at the data of this journal's annual article numbers through the web of science. The articles indexed in 2019 were only published till May 2019, and there’re 601 articles published within five months. It is estimated that the annual article volume could be more than 1,000. In 2009, only 91 articles were published in the year. After ten years, the amount of articles published has increased by 10 times!! Has the current level of technology increased by 10 times than before? 2019 (601), 2013 (692), 2007 (88), 2001 (68), 2018 (700), 2012 (420), 2006 (74), 2000 (64), 2017 (675), 2011 (249), 2005 (60), 1999 (62), 2016 (809), 2010 (80), 2004 (75), 1998 (63), 2015 (606), 2009 (91), 2003 (67), 1997 (54), 2014 (605), 2008 (123), 2002 (54), 1996 (38)

(1) Thank | 1421653134@qq.com

Let me share my submission experience. I submitted in the mid-July, The research content was relatively frontier, the quality of the paper was above the average of our group (The impact factor of journal was not high). It was with editor for more than two weeks. Inviting the reviewers took more than half a month, maybe the suitable reviewer could not be found for a long time. The first review was fast after accepting the review. It took nearly one and a half month; the status was hanged twice during the period. In the first time, it showed that the review had finished. But it changed to under review again in the system a few days later, and it showed that the review had finished in several days. Two review comments came back, two was better, one was awesome, and there were more than 20 comments. I have never seen so many comments before; the main problem is that to supplement the data and analysis, it was hard to deal with. I revised it back and forth for nearly two weeks. I resubmitted the revision, the second revision was fast, and it was accepted within a month. It was with editor for less than half a month. I am looking forward to it. The speed is okay.

(0) Thank | 老汉推车越推越强

I thought I was going to have a good experience with this journal but there were many ups and downs throughout the entire process. Anything from technical issues (figures not showing up in the proof, random hyperlinks in the text, etc.) to multiple rounds of revisions. This is an OK journal but prepare yourself for quite the back and forth between the editor and reviewers.

(1) Thank | Jianyibest

Could you please tell me how many pictures there are? Does resubmission give me a chance, or does the editor still want to accept them?

(0) Thank | lulu好运来

6.1 submit to journal and transfer to editor
6.2 date changed by editor
6.8 date changed by editor
6.18 decision in process
6.20 Editor has given a reject and resubmit decision due to excessive figures in the paper, which need to be reduced before resubmission.

(0) Thank | Clearlove

I want to ask where to choose the subscription option for this journal, why didn't I see any options when submitting.

(0) Thank | Zhengzhuo Yang

I would like to ask where I can select the subscription options for this journal. Why didn't I see this option when submitting my manuscript?

(0) Thank | Zhengzhuo Yang

Which editor are you?

(0) Thank | 小南瓜@

Hello, may I ask how long you have been waiting? I submitted my application on 5.6 and received an invitation on 5.21, but have not been rejected yet.

(0) Thank | 小天才131

Hello, I submitted on 5.6, was told it would be reviewed by 5.8, and then was supposed to go straight to DIP on 5.21. However, there has been no progress so far, even after sending a reminder email. May I ask for an update on the current situation?

(0) Thank | 小天才131

What about now? May I ask which editor you are?

(0) Thank | 小南瓜@

What documents are required for submission? Are there any specific areas that need special attention?

(0) Thank | Nan Zhou

What documents need to be submitted for submission? Is there anything to pay attention to?

(0) Thank | Nan Zhou

416submit
428under review
513 major revise
530 revision submit
6.1accept
Thank you, editor! Thank you, reviewers!

(0) Thank | 小土豆222

The first-instance trial will last approximately four to five days.

(0) Thank | 超级马力

May I ask how many days it will take for your first dip review?

(0) Thank | 我要发顶刊1

May I ask how many days it will take for your first review of the design?

(0) Thank | 我要发顶刊1

Could you please let me know how many days it will take for feedback on part b of the manuscript after submitting to RRC? The editor is Professor Uday Kumar Vaidya.

(0) Thank | 我要发顶刊1

Brother, how many reviewers do you have? What's the situation now?

(0) Thank | 我要发顶刊1

04.26 Submit
05.03 Under review
05.25 Decision in Process

(0) Thank | 李康勇

The quality of this journal is top-notch, but it has been consistently rejected. Our teacher no longer agrees to review it, and it's possible that many other reviewers feel the same way.

(0) Thank | Jing Qiao