The relationship between the results of this study and relevant theories; the shortcomings or limitations of your research; the significance and application value of this study in practical situations; suggestions for future research

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Given the diversity and complexity of biology, it is not a problem for different outcomes to emerge and be published, as scientific research itself allows and encourages questioning, supplementing, and improving previous knowledge, even overturning it. When writing a paper, we need some strategies, focusing mainly on two points: presenting the materials and methods and the results objectively, especially where they differ from others, emphasizing and detailing them; in the discussion section, do not avoid contradictions, compare with the similarities and differences of previous researchers, and try to provide reasonable and effective explanations

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What can generally be discussed in a discussion?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

How to address discrepancies between my discussion and a previous publication?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Sharing Experience: This journal editor is pretty good, the review is not particularly strict. The journal is quite good in the anatomy category, the IF is relatively stable, making small progress

(0) Thank | 寄真小可爱

Why doesn't anyone thank experience?

(0) Thank | 应龙利彬

From less than 1.5 points, now approaching 2 points, it is a good sign, this magazine is worth having

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁