Submission: 2020.06.10; Review started: 2020.07.10; The first revision comments given: 2020.08.22 (major revision); The first revised manuscript was submitted: 2020.09.06; The second revision comments given: 2020.10.08 (minor revision); The second revised manuscript was submitted: 2020.10.19; Comments of final review: acceptance, 2020.10.26. What I did was very unpopular single-bubble mass transfer, and most of the previous related content were also published in Chemical Engineering Science. It was a difficult pull-chainsaw war, but fortunately, the reviewers' comments were not sharp, just because it was revised twice at a certain point. It is worthy of Chemical Engineering Science; it is not easy to be accepted if the content is not valuable. Fortunately, I have succeeded in carrying out an assignment. It is especially gratifying that for the time being, double-blind review comments of 4 reviewers have been returned, and I can participate in the graduation defense. A day to remember!

(8) Thank | 橘子青家的霏霏

2019.7.3, submitted; 2019.12.28, revision; 2020.01.27, revision submitted; 2020.03.20, accepted. The review speed was relatively slow. There were three reviewers, one of them raised the writing questions, and the comments of other two were relatively profound. The quality of the article has proved after the revision. I feel that I have better luck, and the research I do is neither deep nor innovative.

(3) Thank | Shanow

March 5, 2018: submitted to the journal. April 5, 2018: with editor. April 6, 2018: under review. October 05, 2018: required review completed. October 16, 2018: major revision. December 05, 2018: revision submitted to the journal. January 19, 2019: under review. February 25, 2019: minor revision. March 19, 2019: revision submitted to the journal. March 22, 2019: accepted. March 30, 2019: available online. May 9, 2019: final version online. As an old brand chemical journal, the reviewers were very professional and the reviewers’ comments were pertinent, but it took 14 months from submission to formatting.

(12) Thank | Cowadopt

A total of 2 articles have been submitted to this journal by our research team. The first one was accepted, while the second manuscript is still in the system. So far we’ve received reviews from two peer reviewers; both gave excellent scientific evaluations and provided comments on the writing. I spent over a week generating a response to reviewers document. Fingers crossed for a positive decision!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

May I ask how to check how many reviewers have been invited and the progress of their reviews?

(0) Thank | wangrf

2025.3.27 under review
2025.4.2 accept

(0) Thank | dbdota

2025.3.4 revised
2025.3.21 Revised, with editor

(0) Thank | dbdota

How is it now? Has it been submitted for review?

(0) Thank | dbdota

Not yet submitted for review.

(0) Thank | 咔哧咔哧脆

Can you please tell me what's the status now? As of March 7, 2025, it still says "With Editor" when I checked. I'm not sure what the reason is.

(0) Thank | ddlianyi

2025-01-24 Submit to Journal
2025-01-25 With Editor
2025-01-27 With Editor
2025-01-31 Under Review (5, 1, 0)
2025-02-9 Under Review (10, 4, 0)
2025-02-10 Under Review (10, 5, 0)
2025-02-13 Under Review (10, 6, 0)
2025-02-17 Under Review (10, 6, 1)
2025-02-17 Required Reviews Complete (10, 6, 2)
2025-02-19 Required Reviews Complete (10, 6, 3)
2025-02-23 Required Reviews Complete (10, 6, 4)
2025-03-03 Revise (Unable to see the size of the revision, 20 comments from 4 reviewers, given 20 days to make changes)
2025-03-15 Submit to Journal (Directly with Editor)

(1) Thank | jiwen1101

2025-03-12 Submit to journal
2025-03-13 With editor
2025-03-14 With editor

(0) Thank | 咔哧咔哧脆

Is it over?

(0) Thank | 阿拉斯加

Was there a transfer from Chemical Engineering Journal?

(0) Thank | 阿拉斯加

Invite 10 reviewers and accept 1.

(0) Thank | dbdota

2025.1.9 submit
2025.1.10 with editor
2025.1.23 under review

(0) Thank | dbdota

The submission made at 10:30 has been under review for a long time. The first reviewer accepted and completed the evaluation quickly, but the second reviewer accepted without evaluating and invited 20 others. Finally, the third reviewer accepted, but it is unknown when they will finish reviewing and provide feedback. I'm not sure whether to bring my laptop home for the Chinese New Year. It's really annoying.

(0) Thank | abc189

I am also an editor. At the beginning, one rejection was given to me for every one submission. After resubmitting, one was accepted directly, while the other required revisions before ultimately being rejected again. I am torn on whether to make further modifications.

(0) Thank | 猪在海中游

Submitted on 20240922, edited by 1004 and sent email for format modification, 1004 improved the format and submitted; 1011 for review; 1208 first round of comments, 3 accept 1 revise, detailed comments; 1221 revised submission; 20250107, due to a careless mistake of missing a file, requested to re-upload, uploaded the file and replied to comments on the same day; 0116 confirmed acceptance. The whole process took less than four months (even faster), a great submission experience. The field of chemical engineering is highly recognized, among the top three journals in chemical engineering, it can be used for funding applications and job searches.

(1) Thank | 老船长捞大虾

My RRC has been waiting for review for over a month, with no one handling it. Another revised version has also been waiting for over a month with no one handling it. I don't know what the editors are doing.

(0) Thank | wnengyg

An editor who doesn't even log into the system for a month~~ I wonder what such an editor is still doing~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(0) Thank | wnengyg

Even if it is reduced to Tier 3, the three major traditional chemical engineering journals (AIChE, CES) still dominate various Tier 1 journals in the traditional chemical engineering field. They have a high approval rating among younger peers when applying for funding.

(0) Thank | xiaosihan

Submitted on 20230915, first round of reviews in 202311, with 2 revisions requested and 1 rejection, the rejection feedback was very detailed; took 21 days for major revisions, supplemented experiments based on the rejection feedback, provided detailed explanations, and requested a one-week extension; resubmitted on 20231203, accepted on 20231228. Also recently accepted by CEJ and AIChE, with CES having the shortest review period, a great submission experience. The field of chemical engineering is highly recognized, the top three journals in chemical engineering, beneficial for writing grants and job applications.

(0) Thank | xiaosihan

Yes, this should be considered as zone 1, it has been underestimated.

(0) Thank | 面团

I chose to submit to this journal because it has a high reputation in the field of chemical engineering, and its impact factor will not affect its recognition.

(0) Thank | xubin