Submission: 2020.06.10; Review started: 2020.07.10; The first revision comments given: 2020.08.22 (major revision); The first revised manuscript was submitted: 2020.09.06; The second revision comments given: 2020.10.08 (minor revision); The second revised manuscript was submitted: 2020.10.19; Comments of final review: acceptance, 2020.10.26. What I did was very unpopular single-bubble mass transfer, and most of the previous related content were also published in Chemical Engineering Science. It was a difficult pull-chainsaw war, but fortunately, the reviewers' comments were not sharp, just because it was revised twice at a certain point. It is worthy of Chemical Engineering Science; it is not easy to be accepted if the content is not valuable. Fortunately, I have succeeded in carrying out an assignment. It is especially gratifying that for the time being, double-blind review comments of 4 reviewers have been returned, and I can participate in the graduation defense. A day to remember!

(8) Thank | 橘子青家的霏霏

2019.7.3, submitted; 2019.12.28, revision; 2020.01.27, revision submitted; 2020.03.20, accepted. The review speed was relatively slow. There were three reviewers, one of them raised the writing questions, and the comments of other two were relatively profound. The quality of the article has proved after the revision. I feel that I have better luck, and the research I do is neither deep nor innovative.

(3) Thank | Shanow

March 5, 2018: submitted to the journal. April 5, 2018: with editor. April 6, 2018: under review. October 05, 2018: required review completed. October 16, 2018: major revision. December 05, 2018: revision submitted to the journal. January 19, 2019: under review. February 25, 2019: minor revision. March 19, 2019: revision submitted to the journal. March 22, 2019: accepted. March 30, 2019: available online. May 9, 2019: final version online. As an old brand chemical journal, the reviewers were very professional and the reviewers’ comments were pertinent, but it took 14 months from submission to formatting.

(12) Thank | Cowadopt

A total of 2 articles have been submitted to this journal by our research team. The first one was accepted, while the second manuscript is still in the system. So far we’ve received reviews from two peer reviewers; both gave excellent scientific evaluations and provided comments on the writing. I spent over a week generating a response to reviewers document. Fingers crossed for a positive decision!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

On March 13, 2025, submitted to journal (immediately transferred to with editor)
On March 25, 2025, under review
On July 1, 2025, minor revision (3 reviewers)
On July 3, 2025, revision submitted to journal (immediately transferred to with editor)
On July 9, 2025, under review
On July 11, 2025, required review completed
On July 29, 2025, required review completed
On August 1, 2025, minor revision (same 3 reviewers, 1 direct acceptance, 2 language polishing)
On August 2, 2025, revision submitted to journal (immediately transferred to with editor)
On August 5, 2025, accepted

(0) Thank | 西风

2025.6.24 ur (4-1-0)
2025.7.02 ur (6-2-0)
2025.7.06 ur (6-2-1)
2025.7.16 ur (6-2-2) rrc
2025.7.17 interim revise
2025.7.28 resubmit

(0) Thank | 筱筱

Hello, I would like to inquire, what is the submission number when you submit your work?

(0) Thank | Augu*tumn

Hello, I would like to ask, how are you doing now?

(0) Thank | Augu*tumn

Classmate, have you made any progress on your submission yet?

(0) Thank | Lupf

7.24-STJ
7.25-WE
7.30-The status has not changed.
WE has not changed for five days.

(0) Thank | Lupf

It may be due to different fields, it's hard to find reviewers in your field.

(0) Thank | wyc90623

Rejected in less than a week after submitting to CES, be cautious!

(2) Thank | 投稿圣手

Why are you so fast! It's been almost 20 days for me and I am still in the "WE" status. I'm really worried!

(0) Thank | frienda

I submitted the manuscript on the morning of July 3rd, and it was under review in the afternoon. However, it is still under review today without any changes. Is it a bad sign? Why is my manuscript taking so long!

(0) Thank | frienda

It has been three days since I submitted my application and it is now in the decision process. Did you send it out?

(0) Thank | Zhiqiang Sun

6.5 Submit
6.19 Interim Decision (two reviewers, minor revisions)
6.26 Submit
7.7 Accept
Edited by Liu Ping, usually processed within one week.

(0) Thank | wyc90623

The second review has been pending for a week, and there is still no progress.

(0) Thank | 核仁给我力量

Hello, how long did it take for your we to be submitted for review?

(0) Thank | Timehh

There are two reviewers in total, and it took one month from submission to acceptance. I see that others usually take two to three months. I was lucky to encounter a very supportive editor!

(0) Thank | KK_3

Do both of your suggestions appear to be either directly accepted or minor adjustments?

(0) Thank | ddlianyi

On June 22nd, two reviewers returned their comments, indicating that RRC, I thought I would receive a decision quickly. However, on June 24th, I received another reviewer's opinion. So far, I have not received the editor's decision. The processing of the previous steps has been very fast, I wonder what happened with the second review.

(0) Thank | 核仁给我力量

Who is the editor, please?

(0) Thank | 无言以对123

4.25 submit
5.6 under review
5.27 review complete
6.10 Interim Decision (Three reviewers accepted, two minor revisions requested)
6.17 submit
6.18 under review
6.21 accept

(0) Thank | 北纬啊

Submitted on June 16, 2025, we have already been rejected by 11 journals on the same day. We hope the editors and reviewers can show mercy and spare us from further turmoil.

(0) Thank | 筱筱

It's all about looks, grandma.

(0) Thank | pingpang