Submission: 2020.06.10; Review started: 2020.07.10; The first revision comments given: 2020.08.22 (major revision); The first revised manuscript was submitted: 2020.09.06; The second revision comments given: 2020.10.08 (minor revision); The second revised manuscript was submitted: 2020.10.19; Comments of final review: acceptance, 2020.10.26. What I did was very unpopular single-bubble mass transfer, and most of the previous related content were also published in Chemical Engineering Science. It was a difficult pull-chainsaw war, but fortunately, the reviewers' comments were not sharp, just because it was revised twice at a certain point. It is worthy of Chemical Engineering Science; it is not easy to be accepted if the content is not valuable. Fortunately, I have succeeded in carrying out an assignment. It is especially gratifying that for the time being, double-blind review comments of 4 reviewers have been returned, and I can participate in the graduation defense. A day to remember!

(8) Thank | 橘子青家的霏霏

2019.7.3, submitted; 2019.12.28, revision; 2020.01.27, revision submitted; 2020.03.20, accepted. The review speed was relatively slow. There were three reviewers, one of them raised the writing questions, and the comments of other two were relatively profound. The quality of the article has proved after the revision. I feel that I have better luck, and the research I do is neither deep nor innovative.

(3) Thank | Shanow

March 5, 2018: submitted to the journal. April 5, 2018: with editor. April 6, 2018: under review. October 05, 2018: required review completed. October 16, 2018: major revision. December 05, 2018: revision submitted to the journal. January 19, 2019: under review. February 25, 2019: minor revision. March 19, 2019: revision submitted to the journal. March 22, 2019: accepted. March 30, 2019: available online. May 9, 2019: final version online. As an old brand chemical journal, the reviewers were very professional and the reviewers’ comments were pertinent, but it took 14 months from submission to formatting.

(12) Thank | Cowadopt

A total of 2 articles have been submitted to this journal by our research team. The first one was accepted, while the second manuscript is still in the system. So far we’ve received reviews from two peer reviewers; both gave excellent scientific evaluations and provided comments on the writing. I spent over a week generating a response to reviewers document. Fingers crossed for a positive decision!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted on June 16, 2025, we have already been rejected by 11 journals on the same day. We hope the editors and reviewers can show mercy and spare us from further turmoil.

(0) Thank | 筱筱

It's all about looks, grandma.

(0) Thank | pingpang

Just because it's an old brand? I don't care if you are recognized in the industry or not. Your requirement for the introduction of the review not exceeding 300 words is ridiculous. I specifically checked the review that was just accepted, and it didn't follow your requirements either? It's really funny. I won't be in this field in the future, you just keep staying in your second-rate zone, garbage.

(0) Thank | pingpang

It's been a month since the second review, but there is still only one opinion. They have added a new reviewer, and it's even slower than the first review. Sigh.

(0) Thank | 核仁给我力量

Mine too, added a reviewer after rework.

(0) Thank | SYJ

On May 15th, the first review was completed and sent back for revisions. On May 16th, it was sent for the second review, likely with the same two reviewers as before. One of the reviewers accepted the review on the 18th and completed it on the 22nd. The other reviewer accepted the review on the 28th and as of today, June 7th, has not returned any feedback. However, I just found out that a new reviewer has been added today. I was expecting to wait for the second reviewer for a week, so why was a new reviewer added? Is there a high chance of the new reviewer providing feedback for the second review?

(0) Thank | 核仁给我力量

Efficient and fast, thanks and thumbs up for the responsible editor Ling (Jessica) Fei. From peer review to minor revisions decision in just 20 days. From submission to acceptance in less than two months. Particularly interested in chemical processes or new materials research with promising industrial applications.

(0) Thank | 磷化工小旭

Friend~ Does getting a DIP mean being rejected~

(0) Thank | 东彝人

Does appearing DIP mean rejection?

(0) Thank | 东彝人

May I ask how to check how many reviewers have been invited and the progress of their reviews?

(0) Thank | wangrf

2025.3.27 under review
2025.4.2 accept

(0) Thank | dbdota

2025.3.4 revised
2025.3.21 Revised, with editor

(0) Thank | dbdota

How is it now? Has it been submitted for review?

(0) Thank | dbdota

Not yet submitted for review.

(0) Thank | 咔哧咔哧脆

Can you please tell me what's the status now? As of March 7, 2025, it still says "With Editor" when I checked. I'm not sure what the reason is.

(0) Thank | ddlianyi

2025-01-24 Submit to Journal
2025-01-25 With Editor
2025-01-27 With Editor
2025-01-31 Under Review (5, 1, 0)
2025-02-9 Under Review (10, 4, 0)
2025-02-10 Under Review (10, 5, 0)
2025-02-13 Under Review (10, 6, 0)
2025-02-17 Under Review (10, 6, 1)
2025-02-17 Required Reviews Complete (10, 6, 2)
2025-02-19 Required Reviews Complete (10, 6, 3)
2025-02-23 Required Reviews Complete (10, 6, 4)
2025-03-03 Revise (Unable to see the size of the revision, 20 comments from 4 reviewers, given 20 days to make changes)
2025-03-15 Submit to Journal (Directly with Editor)

(1) Thank | jiwen1101

2025-03-12 Submit to journal
2025-03-13 With editor
2025-03-14 With editor

(0) Thank | 咔哧咔哧脆

Is it over?

(0) Thank | 阿拉斯加

Was there a transfer from Chemical Engineering Journal?

(0) Thank | 阿拉斯加

Invite 10 reviewers and accept 1.

(0) Thank | dbdota

2025.1.9 submit
2025.1.10 with editor
2025.1.23 under review

(0) Thank | dbdota