Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0137-5881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1861-1664 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 4.60% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/11738 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/acpp/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D-69121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | GERMANY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Quarterly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 143 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0137-5881%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 4.5 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-19 11:00:00 The manuscript was in review for 3 months. I feel that the journal is still very good. The editor is professional. Generally, the manuscript will be submitted for review in a week. The review period will be about one month, and the opinions will be returned. Generally, you will need to revise and then the changes are generally accepted. ![]() ![]() |
Author: sun777 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-16 23:13:43 The period is wrong, the review period is 3 months, and the entire submission period is close to 6 months. ![]() ![]() |
Author: sun777 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-16 23:12:00 This garbage journal, I will never submit to it again even if I die. I also advise everyone to be cautious when submitting!!! After submitting the manuscript, two reviewers and the editor gave some suggestions, including supplementing material information, adding citations to the reviewers in the introduction, removing subheadings, supplementing significance in the abstract, correcting errors in the figures, and so on, which all together required a major revision. I carefully made modifications according to the suggestions of the reviewers and editor, and wrote a response letter, thinking that there should be no problem with the resubmission this time, as all the issues raised had been addressed. However, the outcome was a rejection after completing all reviews, decision-making, editorial processing, and rejection. After carefully reading the reasons for rejection, I found it absurd. Because both reviewers had given positive feedback on the modifications and improvements made to the manuscript, agreeing to accept it. However, the chief editor rejected the manuscript for reasons such as lack of innovation and scientific merit, issues with experimental methods, lack of data accuracy, high repetition rate, and inadequate explanation of conclusions, among others. I just want to say, if there were indeed such problems, why not point them out during the first round of revisions for me to address, instead of waiting until after the reviewers had accepted it and then bringing up these inexplicable reasons. If you do not respect the suggestions of the reviewers, then why bother sending it for review, and what is the point of having reviewers??? It's really confusing and a waste of my time for almost half a year... ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北国楚云 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-11-28 16:35:19 Check out the latest few articles, all of which were completed in 15-16 months ![]() ![]() |
Author: 宗室宛秋 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-12-14 20:41:39 It has been 11 months since I submitted my manuscript for minor revisions in February. It is still with the editor, and I am eagerly waiting ![]() ![]() |
Author: Booth Carpenter Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-11-13 18:00:00 I am a revised version returned in May. Since July 7th, I have been with editor. How can this journal be like this? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北国乐亦 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-10-24 22:59:20 I am also almost 7.8 months pregnant, and I have no idea what's going on ? I've asked a few times, but all I get is the official response ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北国乐亦 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-10-21 15:08:06 Submitted in November 2021, returned to the author for minor revisions in March and has been with the editor since then. Not sure how much longer we have to wait == ![]() ![]() |
Author: 通幽易蓉 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-08-10 17:45:39 With editor for 6 months, didn't reply after three reminders ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北陆向南 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-07-20 20:40:10 The review process was fast, but after 2 months of review, it was rejected. They raised many issues regarding the wording of the articles, the units of each figure, quantitative statistics, and the relevance to the topic. The review was very detailed, but they did not request additional experiments. Attention should be paid to the writing of the article ![]() ![]() |
Author: Eugene Jacob Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-07-20 19:21:41 Hello, may I ask if you have received it now? It has been six months since my last revision and I have not received any response. I have sent several emails but have not received a reply. After seeing your post, I have decided not to submit to this journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: 通幽易蓉 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-07-07 15:33:45 How are you doing now? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 竹萱小姐姐 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-05-31 22:33:56 What is your situation? My submission has been with the editor for 4 months now ![]() ![]() |
Author: Dale Wells Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-05-23 20:04:10 I also want to withdraw the submission. I won't submit to this garbage journal anymore ![]() ![]() |
Author: 竹萱小姐姐 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-05-18 12:40:00 How about now, I am also in this situation ![]() ![]() |
Author: 正阳小可爱 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-04-22 12:56:22 Submitted on 10-11-2021, Accepted after minor revision on 28-12-2021, to be published online on 01-01-2022 ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北国乐亦 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-04-12 08:41:08 It's been almost a month since my minor revision was under review, but no progress so far despite reminders. I wonder how much longer I have to wait ![]() ![]() |
Author: 狮吼兴修 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-11-29 20:17:55 Congratulations, your paper number is 004, and I am behind you with number 033, but the associate editor and editor have never replied to my emails. It's been over seven months with no updates. I've reminded them two or three times but to no avail ![]() ![]() |
Author: 正阳小可爱 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-11-23 11:33:42 No!!! To the editor-in-chief: przemow@amu.edu Editor's response: Ref.: Ms. No. ACPP-D-20-01004R1 Distribution of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in leaf cuticular waxes and leaf tissues of ants Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Dear Dr. Shen, I have received all the materials related to your submission for final evaluation. I have also noticed the positive recommendation from the Associate Editor. I am pleased to inform you that I might be willing to support this recommendation. However, before the final consideration could be made I have to request some correction(s) from you. Yours sincerely Przemyslaw Wojtaszek Editor-in-Chief Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The authors have revised the manuscript following comments. I suggest accepting it as it is ![]() ![]() |
Author: 魂魄梦梅 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-11-22 18:00:40 Will the rush request be rejected? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 正阳小可爱 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-11-18 23:49:19 With editor 1 month later, I urged and the result was: Dear Author, The Associate Editor has made a recommendation regarding your manuscript. The manuscript was sent to Editor-in-Chief for the final decision. Best regards, Agnieszka Sojka ![]() ![]() |
Author: 正阳小可爱 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-11-18 18:04:07 Dear Agnieszka Sojka, May I ask about the progress of our article "XXXXXXXX"? MS number is ACPP-D-21-010XXR1. We would appreciate it if you could give us the evaluation result by the reviewers as soon as possible. Kind regards, G. S ![]() ![]() |
Author: 正阳小可爱 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-11-18 09:27:35 Dear Agnieszka Sojka, May I ask about the progress of our article "XXXXXXXX"? MS number is ACPP-D-21-010XXR1. We would appreciate it if you could give us the evaluation result by the reviewers as soon as possible. Kind regards ![]() ![]() |
Author: 魂魄梦梅 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-10-29 16:36:49 Has everyone's paper changed recently? Mine has been with the editor for 5 months. Does anyone know what's going on? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 魂魄梦梅 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-10-28 17:07:23 Will the reminder be rejected? Will there be a reply if I send an email? ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page |