Two months were given for major revision, but as there were a lot of things in the middle, it took three months to make the revisions and resubmit it. One month later, it got accepted. It is a slightly lower journal in the mainstream publications of nonlinear science. I feel that the journal is not rigorous enough. However, it belongs to Q2 and can be used as a paper to guarantee the graduation. I will not publish my best work on CSF.

(50) Thank | 追光野猫

A very good journal. During two months, I published an article on Fractals and Chaos respectively. In comparison, it is faster in Fractals. It took more than 20 days to be accepted. But this one is obviously difficult than fractals, and it deserves to be classified as a top journal.

(122) Thank | chong

I submitted 2 papers to this journal, and they were all accepted. The review lasted for 3 months, and the review comments were very professional. I feel it is a good journal, and it is difficult to be accepted without innovation.

(14) Thank | lion-lion

Our group submitted our manuscript on May 4 this year, and it was with the editor through the end of August. Ugh. By early October, we received a notice from the editor that our manuscript had NOT been sent out for external review and that it had been rejected. The editor stated that the level of scientific merit didn’t meet the requirements of the journal. I can’t believe our manuscript was with the editor for 5 months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first article will be submitted in March, revised in April, and accepted in May.

(0) Thank | Kono_suba

When inquiring about the first revision, the attitude of the reviewers was not very good, and there were only two review comments in the second revision, most of which were positive. The review comments directly stated that the manuscript could be accepted after modifications, so will it still be sent for review in the second revision? Or will it be directly accepted or rejected by the editor?

(0) Thank | 顺利接收

Has it been submitted for review?

(0) Thank | z1z2z3z4

Which direction did you invest in, and which one did the editor choose at the beginning?

(0) Thank | guigu123

Still editor invited

(0) Thank | 401装甲旅旅长

What about now?

(1) Thank | Math小星

Still editor invited till now.

(0) Thank | 401装甲旅旅长

How is it always jumping to EI

(0) Thank | jcz24

7.12 Submitted with editor, around number 5100. 
7.13 Editor invited until now. 
It seems that there are too many submissions, causing a shortage of editors.

(0) Thank | 401装甲旅旅长

Almost.

(0) Thank | 阿里亚斯

How does the recognition of this journal compare to PRE, Physica D, CHAOS, ND, CNSNS, and SIADS? Additionally, is there a rough ranking of the recognition of these journals?

(0) Thank | Biomath

20250606 - with editor
20250608 - under review
20250621 - revise
20250626 - with editor
20250626 - editor invited
20250706 - with editor

(1) Thank | Jay的秋刀鱼和猫

What does it mean when the editor of this journal invites?

(0) Thank | zm

What does it mean that the editor of this journal invited?

(0) Thank | zm

Usually two weeks.

(0) Thank | b10elieve

I would like to ask the experts who have reviewed this journal, how long is the review period for reviewers in this journal? It seems to be quite fast on Xiaohongshu. Thank you, everyone.

(0) Thank | 海之熙

That's two weeks, which is still plenty of time. Thanks for the reply, bro.

(0) Thank | Jay的秋刀鱼和猫

The time given to reviewers is very short. The previous article I reviewed was invited on May 17th and had to be returned by May 31st.

(0) Thank | Jiacheng

I also want to ask, it has been nearly 3 months since my first review, and the reviewer has accepted the review but has not yet provided feedback, it feels like it will never end.

(0) Thank | infinity-inf

Has another reviewer been added? I submitted my paper and currently only one reviewer has accepted the review.

(0) Thank | chennnnnnnn

Have you ever reviewed for this journal before? How long does it usually take for the first review to be completed by the reviewers?

(0) Thank | Jay的秋刀鱼和猫