A very rigorous journal! Review recommendation of major revisions returned one month later. Major revisions. Three reviewers asked a total of about 50 questions. It took nearly four months to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Minor revisions were required in the second review and minor revisions were required in the third review. It was finally accepted in the fourth review! I hope the journal will get better and better!

(3) Thank | Real2005

Have you proofread the article now? If you have proofread it, approximately how long has it been since you received the proof?

(0) Thank | wk123

Masters, do we need to copy and paste the abstract from the manuscript when submitting to the Cardiovascular Research journal, or should we create a new Word document and upload it separately? Should we include keywords as well? Also, what does the term "short title" mean in the reader's guide for the cover letter requirements? Should we fill out all this information on the first page of the cover letter before addressing the editor?

(0) Thank | 菠萝炒饭

When submitting to the journal Cardiovascular Research, it was found that three documents needed to be uploaded: a cover letter, a manuscript, and an abstract. The abstract should be copied and pasted from the manuscript into a new Word document for uploading. Should keywords be included in the abstract? Also, what does the term "short title" mean in the cover letter requirements in the author's guidelines? Lastly, should all the necessary information be filled out on the first page of the cover letter before addressing the editor?

(0) Thank | 菠萝炒饭

When submitting to the journal Cardiovascular Research, it was found that three files need to be uploaded: a cover letter, a manuscript, and an abstract. The abstract should be copied and pasted from the manuscript into a new Word document for upload. Should keywords be included in the abstract? Furthermore, the reader's guide mentions the requirement for a short title in the cover letter. What does this mean? Should this information be filled out on the first page of the cover letter, followed by the content addressed to the editor?

(0) Thank | 菠萝炒饭

Hey guys, this is my first time submitting to the Cardiovascular Research journal and I have no previous experience in submitting articles. I am submitting a review article and I noticed that I need to upload three files: a cover letter, a manuscript, and an abstract. Should I copy and paste the abstract from the manuscript and create a new Word document to upload it? Should I include keywords in the abstract? Also, I am not sure what the "short title" in the reader's guide for the cover letter means. Should I fill in all the necessary information on the first page of the cover letter and then proceed with writing to the editor?

(0) Thank | 菠萝炒饭

What are the results? Did you send it for external review?

(0) Thank | 进击的医学生

Thank you very much for receiving the spicy food the other day.

(0) Thank | 北风和洽

A response will be provided within 3-4 weeks after under review, and no new reviewers will be added.

(0) Thank | 钰岩三岁啦

How long does the return process take? Will it involve adding new reviewers?

(0) Thank | 北风和洽

It has been one week since I submitted the article to the editor. When will the review be conducted?

(0) Thank | 仝明

Similarly, the process of revising my work is also quite similar.

(0) Thank | 钰岩三岁啦

It has been a month, during which only the technical editor asked to add the full membrane to the WB.

(0) Thank | 北风和洽

One and a half to two months.

(0) Thank | 北风和洽

It usually takes more than half a month for editing before it is submitted for review.

(0) Thank | 钰岩三岁啦

Generally, it takes about three weeks to submit for review.

(0) Thank | 钰岩三岁啦

How long does it take from submitting your manuscript to receiving the reviewer's comments?

(0) Thank | 仲夏梦菲

Could you please tell me if you resubmitted your paper in the end? How did it go? Mine was also rejected but I can resubmit it, and I am anxious to graduate.

(0) Thank | jia0819

How did it go later?

(0) Thank | 南川运洁

It's been 16 days since the revision was submitted to the journal, so slow.

(0) Thank | 北风和洽

Yes, it is a SCI journal.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

It is a SCI journal.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

It has been a month with the editor now.

(0) Thank | Geraldine Temple

This magazine often does this, rejecting submissions and then asking for revisions, which is basically asking for a second chance.

(0) Thank | 天际华辉

The opinions of all three reviewers are acceptable, all of them think the research is very interesting, and clearly indicate that they hope to strengthen certain aspects of the results in the revision. However, the editor rejected them. In this situation, is the probability of success in the rebuttal high?

(0) Thank | zzzzy!