I am cautiously optimistic about this journal. The reviewers have been very picky recently and the standards have been raised.

(0) Thank | Sousa

So heartbreaking

(0) Thank | 西风寻蓉

Review speed: 24.0
Emphasis on research direction: neurology
Experience sharing: very slow, it took over two months to allocate an editor, submitted a withdrawal, but the withdrawal was very fast, it was withdrawn in one day

(0) Thank | 风陵松月

The corresponding author of SCI journal articles does not necessarily have to be only one person, there is no fixed standard regarding the specific number. This is because different SCI journals have different policies on the number of corresponding authors. For SCI journals that only accept one corresponding author, if the article has multiple corresponding authors, the first corresponding author will be automatically selected as the corresponding author. For SCI journals that accept two corresponding authors, two corresponding authors can be listed. Other requirements apply similarly. In other words, the number of corresponding authors listed by the authors must comply with the regulations of the target SCI journal. The first author of an SCI paper is the person who has made the greatest contribution to the experiment and writing of the article, and is the person listed first in the author list. However, in collaborative work, it is common to have co-first authors. There is no specific regulation on the number of co-first authors, which is closely related to the workload, length of the paper, publication requirements, and the recognition of the institution. Generally, it is most common for an SCI paper to have 2-4 first authors

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Less, mostly full Chinese names

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Can the author write their name in Chinese?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

How many corresponding authors can there be at most? How many first authors can there be at most?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

Be cautious but optimistic about this journal. Lately, the reviewers have been very particular and raised the standards for articles. It might be harder to slip through with low-quality content

(0) Thank | 珉林水芸

Be cautious about this journal. Recently, the reviewers have been a lot of picky, and the standard requirements of the article are higher. It is more difficult to fill the water

(0) Thank | Sousa

Be cautious about this journal, as the recent reviewers have been very strict and have raised the standards for articles. It will be more difficult to submit low-quality work

(0) Thank | 珉林怡瑶

3-point edge, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase is also good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

The editor is very conscientious and has been very helpful in improving the paper

(0) Thank | 普花可爱吗

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: It's still easy to publish, although the reviewers have strict requirements. But with comprehensive data, it's still easy to publish

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

I strongly agree with the comment below

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁