The review speed was very slow, and the revision speed was also very slow. It took 6 months in total. However, the editor was super good, and agreed to the request for an extension of the due date of the revision in the middle. When the submission of final manuscript went wrong, he also agreed with the request for resubmission. For those manuscripts of average quality, but with enough time and sufficient funds, you can try to submit them to this journal. (The publication fee is very expensive).

(0) Thank | 因特拉肯小村医

I submitted to this journal before, and it's pretty fast. My recent manuscript has been sent to a lot of reviewers. I felt that the reviewers are not very expert. They rejected it after 8 months, but gave a chance to resubmit. As the impact factor was too low, we did not resubmit.

(0) Thank | dianannan

I feel that this journal is moderately difficult in terms of its requirements for publication. Our submission spent five months in peer review, after which we received a recommendation for major revision by two reviewers. Some of my colleagues have submitted to Infectious Diseases before; they had a similar experience – waited 7.5 months for reviews.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very slow, suitable for people who have money and are not in a hurry.

(0) Thank | galeno

Submitted in September 24, reviewed in 2 weeks
Revised on October 1 in 24
Revised again on November 2 in 24
Minor revisions in December in 24
Accepted in January in 24

(0) Thank | 心爱的小摩托

The total duration is 6 months, with 2 revisions before acceptance, which is a bit long.

(0) Thank | 科研小白-W

The graduation survival guide is truly a lifesaver, and I was accepted for publication in less than 3 months.

(0) Thank | 5555

The previous one was a technical review, now the external audit of four months has just ended, still waiting for the editor to make a decision! So slow, so slow.

(0) Thank | 璧射瑞锦

I am in the same situation, but most of my editing suggestions were included. There are three reviewers, but the external review only took 5 days. Why did this situation occur, and how is your situation going forward?

(0) Thank | 碧水雅韶

Submitted on February 26th, technical review was completed on March 19th (with one round of technical revisions during this period), sent for review on April 1st, major revisions received on May 7th, minor revisions received on June 10th, and accepted on June 19th. For reference.

(0) Thank | sannia

The review process is slow, taking 3 months, but there are no revisions. Once accepted, publication is also quick

(0) Thank | 客舟

I submitted my manuscript 5 days ago and it passed the technical review quickly. Now it is under peer review, with some minor revisions requested. Does peer review mean internal review, not external? It seems too fast to complete in just 5 days

(0) Thank | 璧射瑞锦

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted the manuscript and passed the technical review in 5 days. Then received 2 minor revision comments from peer review (also within 5 days), followed by point-by-point responses. Currently undergoing peer review. This peer review is conducted within the editorial board, right? It's not under review, correct?

(0) Thank | 璧射瑞锦

Submitted for two months, rejected without external review, be cautious when submitting!

(0) Thank | 素平mio

That's it, it feels like I waited for a long time

(0) Thank | 阿幸2024

Submitted on 18th October 2023, the feedback was rejected on 29th December 2023. Quite fast

(0) Thank | 豆花❀

I think it's a bit slow, and the key point is that after applying for so long, I was rejected directly

(0) Thank | 狒狒1

I agree with you

(0) Thank | 留云怀雁

Brother, how long does this situation last, and how many peer reviewers are there in the first instance?

(0) Thank | 宗室津童

Already accepted

(0) Thank | 暴风秀艳

Hey, brother, any updates on the situation?

(0) Thank | 宗室津童

I have received the Reviewer reports and am ready for the editor's decision. Requesting acceptance

(0) Thank | 暴风秀艳

The submission was made in early July, and it wasn't until early August that it passed the technical review. It has been in the peer review stage ever since. In early September, a rejection letter was received directly from the editor, wasting two months

(0) Thank | 云来冬瑶

About two weeks

(0) Thank | 暴风秀艳

How long have you been using for formal review? It's been two weeks and it hasn't finished yet

(0) Thank | 云来冬瑶