Although this journal was quite good years ago, it has become worse and worse in recent years. Reconsider submitting.

(0) Thank | Eilis

Is it okay to submit submissions now? How long is the submission period?

(0) Thank | 兰花涵亦

The method of relative quantification in qPCR is the ΔΔCT method, first calibrating with a reference gene, and then calculating the difference between the sample and control groups

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, with titles ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to handle the results of qPCR?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

Can my search results include video results?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

What direction are you in?

(0) Thank | 蚀骨香芹

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0
Sharing Experience: It was pretty good before, but it's been getting worse in recent years. Could it drop to Zone 4?

(0) Thank | 凌霄秀梅

Are you still accepting case reports?

(0) Thank | 璃沙依冬

Damn it, last year I scored over 2 points for an article I published, but this year it's just over 1 point. Will it drop even further next year? Who would want to invest in it?!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Too harsh! After such a big drop, who dare to invest in the future??

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: I have submitted to this journal twice this year. The first time, my case report was instantly rejected because the journal no longer accepts case reports. The second time, I submitted on October 8, 2016, and the status was "with editor" until October 30, when it suddenly changed to "accept." I couldn't believe it, it was accepted without being sent out for review. I thought the editor was on vacation, but they accepted it directly. The speed was really fast

(0) Thank | Cara Howells

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Before submitting my article, I read several similar articles in this journal and felt that my article was at least better than those. I submitted it in less than a month, but it was sent to a different reviewer midway and ultimately rejected. That's fine, I can accept that my level wasn't good enough. However, the rejection comments were just terrible. It was clear that the reviewer didn't understand the article at all and misinterpreted the issues mentioned. Most of the comments were about not understanding certain sentences or finding contradictions, but did the reviewer actually read the article carefully? They started by saying my article was poorly written and several parts didn't make sense. There wasn't a single valuable suggestion. My article wasn't submitted as is, both my boss and I had already made revisions to it, so there shouldn't have been any language issues as bad as "poorly written," right? And the editor was also irresponsible for accepting such terrible review comments without giving a chance for corrections. I assume the reviewer just passed my article on to a student or someone, who also didn't bother to make changes and just rejected it with a few random comments. It's really disappointing! I hope this is just an isolated case

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

I have submitted an article before, but it was rejected

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁