The manuscript focused on infectious disease models and computer program simulations. It was submitted in early May of 2019, and review comments were received in early September. It should be a minor revision required, and we only a few references were added and the discussion section was rewritten. The rest was not revised. I was busy in the period, and the revision was resubmitted at the end of October. I received the acceptance notice in mid-February 2020. It was online 3 days later. It took too long to review the revised manuscript. The journal was in Q4. Now I look back at my own article and feel it is quite easy to be accepted.

(1) Thank | nie35786

We submitted a paper on the establishment of a computational model based on biological mechanisms. The first reviews were received about 5 months after submission. There were two reviewers; both reviewers recommended major revisions and provided two to four pages worth of comments. The reviewers were thorough and professional. Once our manuscript was accepted post-revisions, it was published online within one month.

(0) Thank | 潇潇雨歇

Introduction includes all or some of the following five items: introduction to the background of the research field, significance, current development status (insufficiency), the purpose of this study, and a summary of the research content

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The content of the introduction is organized into three to four levels to arrange paragraphs

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How many paragraphs are usually included in an introduction?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

What content should an introduction include?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

The manuscript focuses on infectious disease models and computer program simulations. It was leaked in early May 2019, and received revision comments in early September. It was a minor revision, with only a few additional references added and some rewriting of the discussion section. It was a busy period in between, and the revised manuscript was returned by the end of October. Acceptance notice was received in mid-February 2020, and the article was published on the website three days later. The time for revising the manuscript was indeed too long. The journal is in Zone 4, and looking back at my article now, it seems quite acceptable

(0) Thank | 法慧殿薇

Submitted a paper that established a computational model based on biophysical mechanisms. The first review took about 5 months, with two reviewers, one of them had no objections and recommended acceptance, while the other provided 2 pages of comments, showing a very thorough review that even pointed out some grammatical issues. However, some of the professional questions raised didn't seem very professional, probably from someone in the same field. After revisions, another round of revision took place a month later, with the same two reviewers, one of whom did not raise any concerns, while the second one raised a few questions. After revisions, the paper was accepted directly, and it could be found online a month later

(0) Thank | 矢泽素玲

From less than 1.5 points, now approaching 2 points, is a good phenomenon, this magazine is worth having

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Why has it always been "With editor"?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

http://www.journals.elsevier.com/biosystems

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and ":":http://www.journals.elsevier.com/biosystems

(0) Thank | 德温贝儿

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It has been almost a month since submission, and it is still under review

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: Submissions have been under review for half a month

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

As of January 19, 2010, there is still no news

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁