I personally think that the impact factor is underestimated. I have an article published, which was cited for 9 times in 2 years.

(12) Thank | unsw2012

Except for the lower impact factor, the overall performance of the journal was very good and the reviewers were also very professional.

(0) Thank | 小九

Biomicrofluidics is the number one journal in fluid and plasma physics. I submitted my manuscript a few weeks ago, and the editor (who I know personally) has submitted two manuscripts as well.

(0) Thank | 西门小雪

Everyone can succeed if they work hard and never give up

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Concise and Clear Titles Reflecting the Core Content of the Article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is there a template for writing article titles?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

What kind of topics can impress the reviewers?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

Personally, I feel that if is underestimated. I have posted an article with 2 years and 9 citations

(0) Thank | 金山光临

Applied for 10 days, was rejected outright. The reviewer did not give any chance

(0) Thank | 飞龙昌淼

The price keeps falling, if it goes down further, will it break the 2 mark? It has fallen quite a bit in a year, even if it's just 0.1 point, it should still be valued

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Biohydrodynamics.It is in line with the topic of this journal, and the quality of the article is not bad.Compared with the previous labchip, the basic difference is not too much, but labchip suspects that this top has just been sent, so I have not given it.

(1) Thank | zhang_zhifeng@163.com

Review speed: 1.0
Experience shared: Doing biofluid dynamics. It fits the topic of this journal quite well, and the quality of the article is considered good. Compared to the previous labchip, it is not much different, but labchip found that this topic had just been published, so it was not accepted

(0) Thank | 御阪夏烟

Review speed: 1.0
Experience sharing: Biomicrofluidics is the top-ranked journal for fluid and plasma physics. I work in the direction of microfluidic electrokinetics, and the editor-in-chief personally handles the manuscripts. I have submitted two papers - the first one was recommended to AIP Adv due to lack of biological background, and the second one was accepted by Biomicrofluidics. It's indeed quite difficult to get accepted in the electrokinetics direction, as the editor-in-chief is quite strict. The journal is more likely to accept papers that combine biological entities (such as HIV, DNA, etc.) with microfluidic control

(0) Thank | 御阪夏烟

Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: I just submitted a long article with experimental observations for verification, and chose the direction of electrokinetics. It has been 10 days since submission and the status is still "potential reviewers assigned". Does this mean it has been sent for review?

(0) Thank | 万花海凡

just submitted a long article with experimental observation and verification, and selected Electrokinetics in the direction. The status of submission is 10 days or the Potential Reviewers Assigned. Is it submitted for review?

(0) Thank | xiaoyu1987@stu.xjtu.edu.cn

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The review speed is quite fast, the comments are also very constructive, and the publication speed is also very fast. Overall, it feels good! The journals under aip seem to be very good at promotion, with timely and transparent information in all aspects. Worth investing!

(0) Thank | 法慧才良

The review speed is very fast, the opinions are also very pertinent, and the publishing speed is also very fast.Overall feels good!AIP's journals feel very well-informed, and all aspects of information are timely and transparent.Worth submiting!

(3) Thank | Jeff

is a good journal in the field of microfluidics, the review speed is OK, the editor is also serious

(3) Thank | Anonymous

It is a good journal in the field of microfluidics, with a reasonable review speed and serious editors

(0) Thank | 明冠颖萓

AIP's new issue, two reviewers, reviewers are quick, one month to reply, about two months acceptable.The impact factor is somewhat high, and the personal feeling is that the quality of the article is still worse than APL.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

It looks like it's going up, if it rises a little more tomorrow, it is expected to break through 3 points

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁