2020.5.25 submission; 2020.7.22 major revision; 2020.10.17 revised submission; 2020.11.5 accepted. The direction is biomedical signal processing, and human physiological parameter detection. I personally think that the innovation of this article is moderately low. There were 2 reviewers in total. It may be that the reviewer’s questions were answered in a detailed manner, with more than 20 pages of responses, so it was directly accepted after the revised submission of the first review, which was quite smooth. A very good submission experience.

(25) Thank | 荣猛

It is a very memorable article; it is about medical image processing, and it is considered to take the interdisciplinary advantage. The first time I got the review comments, I found that there were 7 reviewers. This is the time I encountered most reviewers ever. The statuses of the article were attached. 4.22, submitted to journal; 4.28, with editor; 5.1, under review; 5.10, under editor evaluation; 5.11, with editor; 6.5, major revision; 9.4, revision submitted to journal; 9.8, with editor; 9.8, under review; 9.16, with editor; 9.18, minor revision; 9.21, revision submitted to journal; 9.21, with editor; 9.25, under review; 10.12, with editor; 10.13, accept.

(11) Thank | Dr. Strange

2019.2.20 Submission; 2019.10.10 It was hard for me to wait for the first review comments while I sent three reminder letters. 2019.11.16 Comments came back; 2019.11.23 Sent for review; 2019.12.08 Acceptance.

(1) Thank | flye e e e

I waited around 4 months to receive the first reviews of my thesis. However, it was worth the wait because my paper was accepted pending revisions! After addressing the reviewer’s edits and comments, my paper was accepted. It was published online within one month.

(1) Thank | hfxjxu

The first instance of dip changed to we on the same day.

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

I am also dip when it becomes we that day, today is the second day, still no news.

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

Have you changed to WE after the first dip?

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

Perhaps because of good luck this time, the minor revision was quickly accepted after the major revision following the overhaul.
The overall speed of the paper was relatively fast.
2025-03-03 Submitted to Journal
2025-03-05 With Editor
2025-03-11 Under Review
2025-03-29 Required Reviews Complete
2025-04-04 Decision in Process
2025-04-08 Major Revision
2025-05-20 Revision Submitted to Journal
2025-05-20 With Editor
2025-05-22 Under Review
2025-05-30 Decision in Process
2025-06-09 Minor revision
2025-06-09 Under Review
2025-06-10 Decision in Process
2025-06-14 Accept

(0) Thank | AcceptanceBot

Why did "dip" change to "we" at night? What's going on?

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

Can I ask if you are going through a two-day transformation into a major repair?

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

Update: 6.14 changed to dip.

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

6/14 Major Revision

(0) Thank | aa6438

Another week has passed without any news. If there is still no news next month, I really have to run away.

(0) Thank | studenttiantian

May I ask if you are in the submission system, choosing the "send email" action to remind the editor?

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

Friend, the deadline has arrived and I cannot convert it to LaTeX. I have uploaded the Word version twice, selecting the LaTeX option, and the system did not show any errors and generated the PDF normally. I checked the content and it seems fine, so I went ahead and uploaded it. It has been three days and it is still in the "Waiting for Evaluation" status. I contacted customer service and they advised me to upload it this way for now. If LaTeX is required, they will send it back for me to re-upload.

(0) Thank | fred0538

This journal seems to have a bad reputation, with generally slow reviews. Many invited reviewers are unwilling to review, or accept the invitation but then do not actually review the manuscript, which is unacceptable. One article submitted has been waiting for review for over three months by a reviewer who has not completed the review, which is like being in the ICU or dead. If you are unwilling to review, you can decline the invitation; accepting the invitation and not reviewing is unacceptable. In addition, the journal editors also seem inadequate, as two emails have been sent with no response. It is exhausting.

(0) Thank | 青青草原懒羊羊

My first review has three reviewers, the other two reviewers have already completed their reviews, but one reviewer has been reviewing for 46 days and has not completed the review yet. The RRC status has been ongoing for 26 days, and I don't know how much longer I have to wait.

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

What is your expertise? You have invited so many reviewers, the speed is so fast.

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

12th June 2025 Review Complete Completed: 3, Accepted: 4, Invited: 63
12th June 2025 With Editor

(0) Thank | aa6438

The same problem, I had to make a second revision. Latex was not required for the initial submission and the first revision, but it is now required, which is preventing me from resubmitting. The journal is also not responding to my emails. Can you please advise on how to resolve this, lz?

(1) Thank | zzzzzztr

Has the editor not been online to see that the time of RRC has not changed?

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

I would like to ask about the first review process of bspc. Three reviewers were accepted for the first review, and the other two reviewers have already completed their reviews. However, one reviewer has been reviewing for 46 days and has not yet completed the review. The RRC status has been ongoing for 26 days. How much longer do we have to wait?

(0) Thank | Ly啦啦啦

There may be invalid opinions or significant conflicts between two opinions, so the editor has invited more reviewers to re-evaluate.

(0) Thank | ~~~!

Two reviewers in total have provided their comments in about 20 days, and the status has changed to RRC. After a while, it changed from RRC to UR, and the editor invited three new reviewers. What is going on?

(0) Thank | 南城以南

When I was returning the goods, I uploaded the LaTex file. I had no choice, as it was a mandatory option in the system.

(0) Thank | 竹本