Submission on 2025/02/05
Editorial feedback with 3 suggestions, including language, recommended reviewers, on 2025/02/06
Resubmission after revisions on 2025/02/08
Under Review on 2025/02/09
Major Revision on 2025/03/13
Resubmission after revisions on 2025/03/25
Under Review on 2025/03/26
Accepted on 2025/05/11

(0) Thank | YANZITJ

Where can I see the reviewers I have found, have they accepted the review?

(0) Thank | shangmin

Hello, I would like to ask if there is still a need for plagiarism check after the editing of the reworked material.

(2) Thank | z1111w

Hello, I would like to ask if plagiarism check is still required after rework.

(0) Thank | z1111w

Hello, I would like to ask if a plagiarism check is required after the product has been repaired.

(0) Thank | z1111w

Just two weeks.... This can't be considered running away. I always take a month.... Just wait a bit. Don't be too impatient.

(0) Thank | popor

Both of my second-round reviewers have gone missing, it's been over two weeks and they haven't responded. They haven't even looked at the manuscript. Can I follow up with them?

(0) Thank | YJZhou

The overall feeling is very slow, with a total of three reviewers, one of whom ran away after accepting the review. The editor did not handle it, so it may have been delayed for two or three months in the middle, and the manuscript was urged once.
June 27, 2024 Submitted manuscript
February 26, 2025 Accept
In the middle, it went through four rounds of review and three revisions... totaling more than 150 pages of revisions. It's exhausting, but fortunately the final result is good. The editor is a Japanese teacher, and after the first reminder, the processing was quite fast. Good things come to those who wait!

(0) Thank | popor

It can be included in the appendix, or it can be directly submitted for reviewer feedback.

(0) Thank | 田野

Excuse me, experts, after revising the paper, will the editor ask for further reduction of the word count if it exceeds twelve thousand words (twelve thousand)? The word count has already been reduced to ten thousand during the first submission. If it is really impossible to reduce further, can some content be placed in the appendix?

(0) Thank | YJZhou

2024/08/22 First submission
2024/08/24 Editor returns with four suggestions
2024/08/29 Resubmission
2024/08/30 With Editor
2024/09/01 Under Review
16 reviewers were contacted, averaging two per week, with the last two accepting the review
2024/11/15 Major revision
2024/12/12 Submission for revisions
2024/12/13 Under Review
The first reviewer quickly completed the review, while the second reviewer took a week to complete
2024/12/26 Major revision
2025/01/01 Submission for revisions
2025/01/02 Accepted

(1) Thank | Nathan745

Two reviewers, one is revising the manuscript and just returned. Originally there should have been three reviewers, but the second one disappeared and wasted three months. I suggest you follow up on the manuscript, I have reminded them two or three times.

(0) Thank | popor

How did your first round of external review go, my friend? How long did it take for the results to come back? I'm afraid that if I take too long, the editor and the first reviewer will give up on me.

(0) Thank | YJZhou

I am in the same situation. It took 6 months for the first review to come back. The first reviewer was quick to review, but the second reviewer has not provided any feedback yet. The editor has also been unresponsive, only sending out one review invitation at a time. I had to send two reminder emails before finding a third reviewer. Just as the first review came back recently, the second reviewer disappeared. Now I have been waiting for 4 months.

(0) Thank | popor

Why are the reviewers always overdue in reviewing? The first reviewer has been completed for almost four months, and the second and third reviewers invited subsequently have been overdue for two to three months without reviewing. Is there a problem with the quality of the article? The editor may be speechless and has not invited any more reviewers.

(0) Thank | YJZhou

Is there a word limit for this publication?

(0) Thank | Chen a

Yes, it was rejected after the changes were made as requested. I thought it would still be reviewed, but it's fine that it happened quickly.

(0) Thank | 阿呆斯基

Hello, were your submission rejected after modifications as requested?

(0) Thank | Eaine

Hello, have you submitted it for review now? Also, can you please provide me with the feedback you received?

(0) Thank | Eaine

The first round of external audit has been going on for three months, and it's still not finished. Should we wait or push for completion?

(0) Thank | YJZhou

Friend, have you reminded the reviewer about the manuscript during your external review? I have been waiting for over two months for my external review, and the second reviewer has been dragging their feet and not reviewing it.

(0) Thank | YJZhou

Friend, how long does it usually take for you to receive feedback from an external audit?

(0) Thank | YJZhou

Submitted, reviewed quickly, one revision and one rejection, and then rejected. The reason for rejection was that the content was novel but not suitable for the journal. The major revision provided many suggestions, which were still good, but unfortunately.

(0) Thank | 爱德华兹

Hello, may I ask if you have accepted directly? Is there no need for re-review?

(0) Thank | 1112deewdwedew

Being rejected in just one day is indeed very quick.

(1) Thank | 阿呆斯基