4. April 16, 2025: Major revision, considered a small surprise.

(0) Thank | tenacity

1. In April 2024, a reviewer rejected the submission for the September 2024 issue, but the editor said the research was in line with the journal's style and suggested resubmitting.
2. The revised submission was resubmitted in November 2024, and after nearly two months, it is finally Under Review. This is the second paper after changing research direction post-PhD graduation, and I am eagerly hoping for acceptance.
3. I really like the style of this journal.

(0) Thank | tenacity

Update Progress: It took 5 months, went through one external review, received 3 review comments, got rejected, but finally accepted

(0) Thank | Hester

Hello classmate, may I ask how long has it been since your external audit? Mine has been 4 months and I still haven't heard anything, feeling very anxious

(0) Thank | Hester

The official website says that the average time for with editor is 8 days, but I have already submitted it for over half a month and there has been no progress so far. I am anxious

(0) Thank | Hester

How long does it take for a review? How many reviewers are needed? I invited two reviewers, but only one accepted the review

(0) Thank | 本学渣一枚

In predicting the small direction, there are very few influential teams in the country that can stably deliver results.

(0) Thank | 预策

The rejection process was fast, and if it was deemed inappropriate, it was rejected directly without wasting any time. I received a reply on the third day after submitting. After reviewing the paper, the editor has decided to reject my submission at this stage. The editor is also very competent, providing a direct and concise reason for the rejection along with suggestions for revision, unlike other journals that do not provide reasons for rejection. The revision suggestions were very targeted. They encourage resubmission after making the necessary modifications.

(12) Thank | lvjieni