Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | CITIES (According to the latest JCR data, this journal is not indexed in the JCR.) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | CITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0264-2751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1873-6084 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | N.A. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 11.70% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | URBAN STUDIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 795 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Social Science Citation Index | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0264-2751%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on CITIES: | Write a review |
Author: DANI Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-28 13:08:34 Did the editor take a month to make a decision? ![]() ![]() |
Author: J&C Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-01 19:06:09 Received another round of revisions. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Chong Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-08-29 09:26:09 Hello, may I ask if there are any results yet? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Chong Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-08-29 09:25:37 Hello, may I ask if there are any results yet? ![]() ![]() |
Author: J&C Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-08-22 12:32:31 The second review process has been going on for almost 10 months now, with one of the reviewers being unreachable. There has been no progress at all. Despite reminders, there has been no invitation for a new reviewer, and the editor has not provided any feedback either. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Chong Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-08-19 19:37:42 Hello, may I ask if there are any results available? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 啾妮 Subject Area: 管理学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-24 17:04:10 Hello, may I ask how are the results? ![]() ![]() |
Author: dramar Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-11 20:53:17 5.14 submission 5.18 external review 6.9 return from external review 7.10 major revision It is a journal with a very fast turnaround time that I have encountered. ![]() ![]() |
Author: rhcrazyy Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-16 23:47:40 The journal is good, just a bit slow. The peer review process takes over a month to complete, and each round at the editorial office takes at least another month, which is quite frustrating. The second round took over two months, but luckily a decision to accept was made a few days after it started being processed. It seems like the journal is not likely to reject after revisions have been made, so there shouldn't be a problem with accepting it if the revisions are done carefully ![]() ![]() |
Author: J&C Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-08 14:04:53 I wanted to ask, have you ever had a change in date after a reviewer's response? I encountered a similar issue, where one reviewer completely disappeared ![]() ![]() |
Author: 窝斯泥蝶 Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-17 18:42:14 The entire process left a very good impression on me, it was very efficient and professional ![]() ![]() |
Author: Cici雨 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-01-24 12:51:31 Submitted on 10/03, underwent external review on 17th, after four months received two sets of feedback from external reviewers, and was rejected in early January. One reviewer gave constructive feedback with a few suggestions for minor revisions. The other reviewer provided only two somewhat unreasonable methodological comments, leading to rejection by the editor. A rebuttal letter was sent to the editorial office and an email response indicated that the editor had been informed, awaiting further response ![]() ![]() |
Author: Cici雨 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-01-24 12:46:16 Submitted in early October of the 23rd year, external review on the 17th, received two external review opinions until mid-January, one provided good feedback and suggested a few points for modification, and the other gave two absurd and negative opinions before being directly rejected by the editor. Refuting each of the two opinions from external review 2, I wrote a rebuttal letter, replied to the editor with the feedback, and am awaiting a response ![]() ![]() |
Author: CarolGU Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-01-13 22:13:35 It has been two months since submitting the manuscript, and it is still in "with editor" status. Only a template reply was received after following up ![]() ![]() |
Author: Nature 小弟 Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-12-01 22:51:42 The journal is very good, the editors are very responsible, and the reviewers' comments are able to stand at a certain height, starting from the perspective of the whole world and all humanity. The revision process is painful, but it is also a kind of training. I hope that others can learn from it and truly promote the progress of the discipline, influencing the development of human civilization ![]() ![]() |
Author: 陆伯言 Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-10-26 08:48:36 The final editor handled it. It's funny that one reviewer went missing, and the other reviewer uploaded the comments from the first round of reviews. I really can't believe it, what kind of attitude do reviewers have nowadays. Got minor revisions on October 17, had 15 days to respond, the editor gave 3 suggestions. Revised on the 23rd, accepted on the 25th. It's been almost a year of back and forth, submitted on November 28, 2022. Fortunately, the result was good, compared to the 80 days online for the total cycle, it's like night and day ![]() ![]() |
Author: J&C Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-10-11 16:13:33 The first time I saw a major revision, I was only given a month ![]() ![]() |
Author: 陆伯言 Subject Area: 经济学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-16 19:47:50 I give up. Returned for revisions on April 21st, under review on May 1st. One reviewer uploaded comments on May 24th, while the other reviewer disappeared after accepting the invitation. Still no response. I have reminded the journal, but no results. Feeling dizzy ![]() ![]() |
Author: Van Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-11 10:44:32 Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:" as titles ![]() ![]() |
Author: shire123 Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-08-18 01:11:13 Submitted in October 22nd Received first review results in February 23rd, one minor revision and two major revisions Revised and submitted in March This round was quite fast, received second review results in April, two acceptances and one major revision from a reviewer. Since the reviewer had doubts about certain methods used in the paper, the original text was basically not modified. Had an argument with the reviewer and informed the editor about the situation, and finished the revisions at the end of April. This round was quite long, received reviewer’s comments in early July, the same reviewer still held onto an issue. The editor requested us to either revise or provide arguments to refute the reviewer, and mentioned that the decision of acceptance will be based on this round of responses. Made revisions within a week, mainly refuting the reviewer's comments, and submitted. Received acceptance notice in August. Overall, the process was smooth, but the total time was still somewhat long (10 months). The associate editor always provided some friendly suggestions during each review, making the submission process comfortable ![]() ![]() |
Author: 南瓜goodluck Subject Area: 管理学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-08-04 19:51:16 Does anyone know if it is necessary for each author to click on the link to confirm co-authorship after submitting a manuscript? Will it be rejected if they do not click on it? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Erin_Cloud Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-07-13 10:19:37 The whole process took nearly a year, and the editor only found one reviewer. In the end, the reviewer even gave a rejection opinion... It took too long. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Van Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-06-16 12:41:52 with editor for about a month, review process takes about five months, currently in "Decision in Process", let's see how long it will take!!! Be cautious when submitting! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Van Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-06-16 12:39:30 Just following up, it has been nearly 6 months since submission for review, and now it is "Decision in Process". ![]() ![]() |
Author: Van Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-06-16 12:38:01 Follow-up to come, will the final modification be accepted or rejected? ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page |