This is my first submission. The editorial office and reviewers are very serious, responsible, and friendly. The review cycle is relatively short, about 20 days for the first review and 10 days for the second review. Both reviewers are very professional and friendly. They asked very detailed questions and offered suggestions, but the questions were not difficult to answer. After the required experiment was supplemented and the revision was submitted, it was well received and directly agreed to be published.

(5) Thank | Shiping

The editors may intend to find reviewers again, which will take at least another two months

(0) Thank | 北陆向南

I encountered a situation similar to yours, with only one reviewer willing to accept the review, and their comments were returned two weeks ago. It has been over two months now since submission, and the editor has not sent any messages yet!

(0) Thank | 南川凌旋

My situation is a bit unlucky, this magazine publishes very few articles per year, and I decided to submit my article initially because the articles already published in the magazine showed a good speed from submission to acceptance

(0) Thank | 北陆向南

Is it really this slow? Invited 14 reviewers, only one returned feedback, it's a bit difficult! Time is being wasted

(0) Thank | 南川凌旋

Review speed: 4.0 Experience sharing: In July, 14 reviewers were invited to review, but only 2 were willing to review, one of whom later lost contact. Two months later, a reminder was sent to urge the reviewers. The editorial department re-invited new reviewers, but after two more months, only one reviewer replied with review comments. The review was not very serious but directly rejected, causing a drag

(0) Thank | 北陆向南

How long does it take to appoint an editor?

(0) Thank | 宫古经赋

How long does the Editor evaluating revision typically take to give a result?

(0) Thank | 八坂单阏

How long does the initial review take? It has been almost two weeks and I am still awaiting the appointment of an editor, is this normal?

(0) Thank | 北陆向南

Submitted on January 26th, the status remained unchanged for 3 months, always under review. On May 22nd, it showed that 2 reviewers had accepted. Awaiting their report. It was minor revisions on May 26th, resubmitted on June 8th, and accepted on the 10th

(0) Thank | 打狗康成

This varies from person to person. If the main result has been completed, it is generally recommended to start with the results first. If the main result is still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction first

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If the main part has been completed, it is recommended to start with the results. If the main results are still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the usual writing order for a research article?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

Why is it recommended to start writing a research article from the results section? Can we start from the methods section?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

Review Speed: 1.0
Experience Sharing: The first submission was met with a very responsible and friendly editorial board and reviewers. The review process was relatively short, with the first review taking around 20 days and the second review about 10 days. Both reviewers were professional and friendly, providing detailed questions and suggestions that were not difficult to address. After completing the requested experiments and revisions, the paper received positive feedback and was accepted for publication without further revisions

(0) Thank | 巧兰来了