This magazine is rubbish, everyone should be cautious about submitting to it. The appointed reviewers are very unreliable, they delay the review process for up to a year, and they are extremely unprofessional. The reviewers have great power, they may plagiarize your ideas, withhold your article from publication, and then quickly steal your research and rush to publish it as their own. They do not even allow you to withdraw your submission, they are very domineering. Everyone should be cautious about submitting articles to avoid being deceived.

(0) Thank | 大影子

This magazine is rubbish, everyone should be cautious about submitting to it. The reviewers they found are extremely rubbish, the review process can be delayed for up to a year, and the reviewers are very unprofessional. They have a lot of power as reviewers, and they may plagiarize your ideas, suppress your article from being published, and then steal your research direction, quickly plagiarize your results, and quickly publish your article without allowing you to withdraw it. They are very domineering.

(0) Thank | 大影子

What does it mean when it shows "Awaiting Referee Reports" ten days after submission? Does it mean that it's not looking good if it doesn't show "Under Review" directly?

(0) Thank | MarginalBridge

July 12th under review
September 11th provisionally accepting the review comments, no more modifications needed
September 19th accept!!!

(0) Thank | 希望文章能过

The submission has been rejected. The journal has high quality standards, and the reviewers' comments are very constructive.

(0) Thank | 其Q

It's July 3rd and it still says "manuscript received." Help! They're not replying to my emails either.

(0) Thank | 希望文章能过

I would like to ask if you followed the journal template when submitting your paper, or if there are no specific formatting requirements for submissions.

(0) Thank | 科研民工李山竹

On January 24, 2024, the manuscript was submitted. It was returned for review on March 25, and then resubmitted after making revisions based on the reviewer's comments on April 23. The status remained as "manuscript received" until May 22 when an email was sent to request an update. On May 25, a reply was received requesting the submission of the source files. The source files were submitted on May 26, and the status remained as "manuscript received" thereafter. Despite sending two follow-up emails in June, there was no response, and the status remained as "manuscript received." Can anyone provide guidance on how to proceed with this situation?

(0) Thank | 希望文章能过

How long does it take to be included in SCI?

(0) Thank | 为论文彻夜难眠

How long does it take for online publication to be indexed by SCI?

(0) Thank | 为论文彻夜难眠

How long have you been in the state of "awaiting decision"? I've been in this state for four days already

(0) Thank | tolen44

The manuscript has been submitted, and the initial review by the editor was done quickly, with a decision made within six days. The revisions based on the external reviewer's feedback are needed within a month. However, there was no attachment with the email from the journal containing the reviewer's comments. An email has been sent to the journal, but there has been no response for four days. Does anyone know what is going on? There was no attachment in the email, and the author center also does not show the reviewer's comments

(0) Thank | .Z

Senior brother, how is the follow-up going?

(0) Thank | Yugoslavia

The initial review process by the editor was very fast, but it has been almost 3 months since the external review and there is still no news. What's going on? Are there any friends in the same situation?

(0) Thank | R

The editing process is fast, usually within a week. However, it is difficult to find external reviewers, and the first external review took three months, resulting in an overall slow pace with three external reviewers.

(0) Thank | young

District four, sigh... Disappointed, don't believe the new publication's high-quality promotion.

(0) Thank | zwlibra

Does "awaiting decision" mean it has been sent to the editor after "awaiting referee reports"?

(0) Thank | 科科

May I ask if "awaiting referee reports" has been changed to "Awaiting Decision", does it mean that it has been sent to the editor after the review process?

(0) Thank | 科科

Results will be provided within one week, informing whether it was rejected or requires external review. The first round of revisions will be given within one month. After the first round of revisions, a response should be expected within one week for the second round of revisions. Once minor revisions are submitted, a response will be given on the same day, confirming acceptance. The efficiency of the review process is extremely high!

(0) Thank | 不知所谓

End of April 2022 submission
Mid-June 2022 appropriate modifications (language)
After submission, minor revisions until the end of June 2022 (language)
Accepted in early July 2022
Two reviewers, requiring polishing. Can be submitted to the economic environment. Acceptance rate is around 10% - 15%
OA: £1160, ¥9300, IF=3.237

(0) Thank | 是一只猫啊啊啊

Hello, may I ask if there is a copyright statement to be submitted after your article is accepted?

(0) Thank | 夏天的空调

Hello, may I ask if you submitted a copyright statement after being hired?

(0) Thank | 夏天的空调

Environmental Research
Feb 18, 2020: With Editor
Feb 25, 2020: Under Review
Apr 27, 2020: Major Revision
May 16, 2020: Minor Revision
May 20, 2020: Accepted

(0) Thank | 家有元小胖

Feb 18, 2020 - With Editor
Feb 25, 2020 - Under Review
Apr 27, 2020 - Major Revision
May 16, 2020 - Minor Revision
May 20, 2020 - Accept

(0) Thank | 家有元小胖

In district 4, it is possible to find three or four reviewers. It is estimated that the quality of the article is still guaranteed.

(0) Thank | TENCAT