Brother, where are you at now?

(0) Thank | He Ren..

Submission: 29 Dec 2024
Revision comments: 2 Apr 2025 Two reviewers, one major experiment revision, one direct acceptance given, final major revision provided by editor (one month)
Revised: 18 Apr 2025
Accepted: 5 May 2025

(0) Thank | 璃陌1201

4.25 Minor repair
5.04 Accept
Submitted for 136 days, the first submission, encountered four active immortals, it was quite good but not very good, will not submit next time, beware of lightning.

(0) Thank | pxpx

25.01.22 Submitted
25.02.15 With editor
25.02.24 Under Review
25.02.25 Under Review (Accepted by reviewers)
25.02.26 Under Review (Accepted by reviewers)
25.03.04 Required Review Complete (2 reviewers completed)
25.03.12 Required Review Complete (2 reviewers completed)
25.03.24 Major Revision (20 comments from 2 reviewers, no additional experiments needed, one month for revisions)
25.04.21 Revised submission
25.04.22 With Editor
25.04.25 Under Review (1 reviewer completed)
25.04.28 Accept
The submission was made before the new year, and despite the longer processing time within the journal, the external review process was quite fast, especially from revision to acceptance, which only took one week. Many thanks to the Associate Editor, Cristiana Di Valentin, for the fast handling, and best wishes for the continued success of the journal!

(0) Thank | 呼呼哈嘿cdp

Thank you, but when I input the manuscript number and the name of the corresponding author in the mini-program, the system prompts that it is incorrect or not within the search range. Is it related to not associating with the journal's ORCID?

(0) Thank | persistent957

After submission, it can be viewed on the Aisweier mini program.

(0) Thank | 科研小白

How did you check the status of your article? I entered the manuscript number on LetPub and it showed an error.

(0) Thank | persistent957

Ten reviewers is too many.

(0) Thank | persistent957

4.26 Under Review invited 10 reviewers, only 1 accepted the invitation. The reviewer completed the review on the same day they accepted it, which most likely means a rejection.

(0) Thank | 科研小白

4.25, finally, made a small revision, all were very simple formatting issues, finally relieved after more than four months.......... It's pretty good, just a little bad, I'll never invest in this company again.

(0) Thank | pxpx

4.07 Submitted to Journal
4.25 With Editor

(0) Thank | 科研小白

How did yours go? I invested on 4.11, but there has been no response at all.

(0) Thank | Wanjun Wang

What is the status of your article now?

(0) Thank | 四氟硼酸亚硝

It has been 15 days since I submitted to Journal. If they reject me in the end, it will be too much of a delay.

(0) Thank | 四氟硼酸亚硝

Have your status changed?

(0) Thank | 科研小白

It has been 18 days since the submission to Journal, is this normal?

(0) Thank | 科研小白

24.12.30 submitted to Journal
25.02.12 required reviews complete
25.03.15 minor revision
25.03.26 submitted
25.04.02 under review
25.04.23 accept
Thank you to the editor and reviewers!

(1) Thank | 蟹苑头头

4.9 received, but the final draft has not been sent yet. I am waiting for it, should I send an email to inquire? The status shown in the tracking link is: "22 Apr 2025 Rights & Access form sent to you for completion." There has been no email in my supervisor's inbox either.

(0) Thank | 哇哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

This journal is super super super slow, even turtles shake their heads when they see it.
March 14th submission
March 29th editor processing
April 3rd DIP
April 17th rejection
Rejection feedback takes half a month to come out
Super slow slow slow!

(0) Thank | 七七月

Until the 15th of April, there has been no response from the Editor, I wonder what the journal is up to.

(0) Thank | HDUer

Employed for three to four months, with two modifications.

(0) Thank | joeyQ

The RRC process of this journal will be very slow, you can send an email to urge them. I found out after urging that the editor had already read the review comments, but just didn't deal with them.

(0) Thank | 行者1995

It took more than 20 days for my STJ and WE to be reviewed.

(0) Thank | 行者1995

3.6 Return of feedback, I waited for all reviewers to finish their reviews before providing feedback, so it took a longer time.

(0) Thank | 哇哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

3.6 Feedback on revisions: I waited until all reviewers had completed their reviews before providing feedback. This process took a relatively long time.

(0) Thank | 哇哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈