Submitted for review on June 22nd.

(0) Thank | Nexusz

June 22nd With editor

(0) Thank | Nexusz

June 21st with editor

(0) Thank | Nexusz

June 20 with editor

(0) Thank | Nexusz

June 18 with editor
Who said this journal is fast! It's so slow.

(0) Thank | Nexusz

June 16th with editor

(0) Thank | Nexusz

June 11th stj
June 15th stj
I want to ask you guys, isn't this journal supposed to be quick? Why is stj taking so long? Does anyone have a recent submission timeline? I'm getting a bit anxious waiting. Feel free to share.

(1) Thank | Nexusz

Brother, how long have you been stj for? Have you submitted for review yet?

(0) Thank | reyuan

Can I ask everyone how long does stj take? Mine hasn't responded at all.

(0) Thank | Nexusz

I am also in this state, not moving at all.

(0) Thank | peter2333

Hey bro, has your status changed at all? I've been applying for several days and still no luck, so frustrating.

(0) Thank | Sivan

How did it go for you? I have also submitted to the Journal a long time ago, but haven't heard anything yet.

(0) Thank | ZXBJ

Have you ever been rejected without going through the editor?

(0) Thank | ZXBJ

It has been three days and the paper is still submitted to the journal, is this normal? I see that many others receive results within one day.

(0) Thank | ZXBJ

Top in the industry, the editing is excellent!

(0) Thank | yzh2019

SCI and SSCI are both top-tier journals. Dream Lover, go for it!

(0) Thank | Cabot

The manuscript was submitted on December 17, 2024, and was under review on December 18 with a score of 5-0-0. On December 20, the score was 7-0-0, and on December 25, it was 8-1-0. On January 2, 2025, the score was 10-1-1 (the first reviewer took a week to complete the review). On January 3, the score was 10-2-1, and later on the same day, it was 10-2-2 (the second reviewer took half a day). On January 5, a major review was conducted, with the editor providing 6 suggestions mainly related to formatting and the abstract. Reviewer 1 raised 4 issues, requiring modifications to 2 and explanations for the other 2. Reviewer 2, not being very familiar with the field of the article, asked some questions that were directly answered without making changes. Overall, there weren't many changes needed. The revised manuscript was submitted on January 13. The editor provided minor revisions after reviewing it on January 15. The revised manuscript was resubmitted on January 17, and on January 19, the editor requested further minor revisions, mainly related to formatting. The final revised manuscript was submitted on January 21 and was accepted on January 22. The journal's speed was very fast, providing feedback within two to three days of submission without unnecessary delays.

Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to the editor, editorial team, and reviewers for their hard work, which greatly helped improve the quality of my paper. I am also thankful to the reviewers for acknowledging the innovation in my paper. Finally, I have successfully published my first paper in my second year of graduate studies.

(0) Thank | 科研小苏

Dear research experts, has anyone experienced this journal before? After major revisions, the status changed from "with editor" to "Decision in process" within two days, without going through the "under review" stage. Is this normal? Does it mean that there is no chance for minor revisions and we should just wait for rejection?

(0) Thank | 科研小苏

It's a bit challenging, as of now, over 90% of the articles submitted to this journal are rejected at the initial review stage.

(0) Thank | npipa

Rejecting in the afternoon, accepting in the evening, truly a love story in a dream. The pain of love is just as unbearable as the rejection from a scientific journal at the speed of light, but the only good thing is that it does not waste precious youth.

(0) Thank | Dewey-

2024.12.7 Submitted to Journal
2024.12.8 with editor
2024.12.9 reject
Extremely high efficiency

(0) Thank | charint

Could you please tell me where I can find the template? I currently have a draft but have not yet made the necessary changes according to the template.

(0) Thank | Uu优乐美

I would like to inquire about where to find the manuscript template for your journal. Thank you, I currently need to reference the template for editing.

(0) Thank | Uu优乐美

Thanks to the efficient editing and angel reviewers of SPC journal, the paper was accepted today. Let me share the timeline with everyone: Submitted on 5.15, sent for review on 5.15, Reviewer 1 accepted the review on 5.21, but one reviewer did not provide feedback so the editor had to find another reviewer. Reviewer 1 completed the review on 6.11, but no reviewer was found during the summer break. Reviewer 2 accepted the review on 9.3, completed the review on 9.20, major revisions were done from 9.23 to 10.21, minor revisions were done and returned on 10.27, and finally accepted on 10.30. Overall, SPC gives reviewers 21 days for review, and although the holiday affected the review progress, the editor was very efficient.

(0) Thank | Eaine

The submission with the manuscript number was rejected instantly, regardless of the decent speed.

(0) Thank | 中国抽象院院士