Jul 07 2020, submitted to journal (transferred from Journal of Alloys and Compounds); Jul 21 2020, manuscript number (the editor was a bit slow, who took two weeks); Jul 21 2020, under review; Aug 05 2020, under review; Aug 13 2020, under review; Aug 17 2020, under review; Aug 24 2020, revision; Sep 05 2020, revision submitted to journal; Sep 07 2020, under review; Sep 18 2020, under review; Sep 21 2020, required reviews completed; Sep 26 2020, accept.

(2) Thank | xiaojianrong531

The transfer will take 3–4 weeks, and you should be careful! I sent a consultation e-mail, and part of the original text of the response was as follows: We had a submission system transition from EVISE to Editorial Manager (EM) and as a result there is a minor change in the workflow where the article directly reaches the Managing Editor even if the status reflects as "Submitted to journal" and the Editor will do the primary checks prior assigning the article to a handing Editor. Kindly expect an update on your article in next 3 to 4 weeks.

(2) Thank | 天真

Share the submission process and by the way answer the questions of the students in previous posts. The article was rejected by MD, and nearly 40 questions were raised by 5 reviewers. The editor recommended us to transfer it to MTCOMM, and there was no need to send it for review if it was well revised. This is the third article in my master's degree. I will graduate in June. When I saw the name of Materials Today, I transferred it. Thinking about the IF will rise in the future, I regarded it as an investment for the future. After agreeing to transfer, the corresponding author’s mailbox will receive an email within 72 hours, where a link was provided and you can click in and submit your paper. Note that only the corresponding author can receive the email. I revised it for 20 days and then uploaded it to the system. I thought it would be accepted directly, and I didn’t expect it to be sent for review again. After with the executive editor for 2 days, it was assigned to the deputy editor, and it was sent for review after 1 day. 12 days later, the result was received. It was sent to the previous reviewers from MD. One agreed to accept it, and the other one asked a lot of questions. It was so speechless. It’s not MD, but why is it so strict? We had no choice but continue to revise, then submitted the revision after 18 days. It was re-sent for review on the same day, and we received the results 12 days later. There were only a few minor issues, we revised it for 2 days and submitted it, and it was accepted 9 minutes after submission... I was surprised... Was the editor 24h online? It was so fast... Generally speaking, the review speed is very fast, and the deadline for reviewers is 12 days. It is recommended that if you have extra articles in your hand, you can try it. I feel that as it is with Materials Today, the IF will rise. In addition: The manuscript can not be submitted to this journal directly, but can only be transferred to.

(5) Thank | 是豆豆啊

4.19-Submission
4.19-with editor (Editor: Juan Balach)
4.24-Formatting issues, editor requests revision
4.25-Resubmission
4.27-Under review
5.18-RRC (Reviewed by 2 reviewers)
5.22-Back to under review?? (Continuing to invite reviewers, but none accepted)
6.8-Received reviewer comments (6 comments from 2 reviewers) (Editor: Abhishek K Mishra)
6.17-Revision submitted
6.18-With editor
6.19-Under review
6.21-Accepted

(1) Thank | 青菜1

Submission number 9 is still with the editor. Does anyone know what's going on?

(0) Thank | Yu Pengfei

One reviewer has gone missing, and we are still waiting for the submission on May 8th.

(0) Thank | carpediem1224

I hope the journal will get better and better, with big thumbs up for the reviewers! The speed is very fast, and the editors are reliable! This is the starting point of my research! I'm so happy!

(0) Thank | PPPPPP

Submission number 3 is for Wednesday (WE), the update on the 4th has been changed to the 12th, still for Wednesday. Does this mean it's going to be rejected?

(0) Thank | 573

Has that been submitted for review?

(0) Thank | 573

Did you submit it for review later?

(0) Thank | 573

The translation in English is: "The speed is very fast.
2.13 submitted
2.17 under review
4.4 R1
4.23 R2
5.13 accepted"

(0) Thank | mreosng

How long has Underview been around for?

(0) Thank | LCX

How long does Under view take?

(0) Thank | LCX

Brother, where is the template for this journal?

(0) Thank | ZFF2191

9 days

(0) Thank | 微分方程

How long have you been in WE?

(0) Thank | 573

How long have you been in the game? Mine has been 5 days already.

(0) Thank | 573

June 6th under review.

(0) Thank | Hongh

The reference format issue on June 4th needs to be revised, and resubmitted on June 5th.

(0) Thank | Hongh

投

June 1st投
still in we on June 5th

(0) Thank | LCX

Does this journal submission page have an option to suggest reviewers?

(0) Thank | qwe666

Have you received any updates on your thesis?

(0) Thank | 573

The paper on nanotechnology is related, submitted on 2025-06-03, with editor.

(0) Thank | Hongh

How are you, brother?

(0) Thank | Hongh

9464了 can be translated into "It's over 9464."

(0) Thank | Hongh