It was my first submission and I needed to adapt to the interface. Of the two reviewers, one said it was substantial and the other required minor revisions. It was accepted within 15 days after revision and it was online in more than 20 days. It is normal speed. This series of journals are relatively better.

(2) Thank | 向心

It is a good journal with rapid review. There were one substantial revision and one moderate revision, and detailed revision comments were given. It was revised according to the comments, and then it was resubmitted. It was accepted after minor revision and polishing. It took two months and a half in total. The quality of the journal is OK.

(7) Thank | THIED

It has been accepted after the submission of revision. The editor is very responsible, and the efficiency of processing the manuscripts is high. The questions raised by the reviewers were very professional, which were targeted. I think it is a good journal.

(5) Thank | dongchongxiacao

The review process started on July 6th, with a deadline of 10 days for reviews. However, one of the reviewers requested a 10-day extension, and the final review comments were received on July 26th, with one major revision and one minor revision required. Two weeks were given for revisions, and the revised version was submitted on August 4th. One reviewer approved publication on August 5th, another on August 6th, and the associate editor on August 7th. It was really fast, but the publication fees are too expensive, around 3150 CHF, which is almost 28000, and there is also a 6% value-added tax. I don't know if it's possible to avoid paying the value-added tax.

(0) Thank | 吃呢苏

Submitted on June 11th, assigned to editor on July 3rd, this speed is a bit slow.

(0) Thank | 吃呢苏

Hello. Do you need to upload the raw data? For the repetitive 3 times WB, do you want it to be fully coated? Is it necessary to have repeated data for the slicing?

(0) Thank | kevinAnthony

"Chinese Academy of Sciences' warning journal, not eligible for reimbursement of domestic page fees, not eligible for participation in professional title evaluation. Manuscript has been retracted."

(1) Thank | letpub_li

The four reviewers reviewed the manuscript quickly.

(2) Thank | 虎踞狼牙