Finally it's my turn to write a comment. It was all tortures. Submitted on 2020-11-20, rejected on 2020-12-27. The review speed is quite fast. Of the 4 reviewers, one suggested major revision and resubmit, one was more satisfied with it, and the other two said that it was not innovative enough. In general, the reviewers were quite professional. This journal has a great development potential, but only 118 articles are published each year. The difficulty of acceptance is not low. You must be careful! I will need to edit it again and submit it to other journals. Good luck to me! Whoops.

(8) Thank | weijinfenggu

2020-06-07 submitted; 2020-06-10 Awaiting review scores; 2020-07-10 Awaiting AE recommendation; 2020-07-12 Awaiting EIC recommendation; 2020-07-13 Reject! I personally feel that review experts are more responsible, and big and small questions can be raised. If the article is very logical and the analysis of the results is in place, they should give you at least an opportunity to revise.

(5) Thank | Taylor

Manuscript received, 07-Sep-2019; Major revision decision, 09-Oct-2019; major revised, 30-Oct-2019; Accept, 27-Nov-2019. The review speed of this journal is the fastest among that of IEEE Transactions series. The editor is very responsible, who doesn’t delay. It took one month for the first revision, and it took less than a month for revision. It took one month for the second revision, and it was accepted in the end. It took less than three months in total. There were four reviewers, two of them made good comments, one made many moderate comments, and the other one made poor comments. In the end, major revision was required. After the major revision, the reviewers were satisfied, and it was finally accepted. The suggestion I gave to you who will submit articles to this journal is that you should revise the article carefully. The editor is really nice and responsible.

(10) Thank | 欧拉公式

The reason why the manuscript was sent back to the editorial office and then re-sent to the reviewers is because the system automatically changes the status when feedback from all three reviewers is received. However, if the editor notices that not all feedback has been received, the status will be changed back to waiting for reviewer feedback.

(0) Thank | 泰勒好想被展开

2025.6.19 Awaiting Area ED Recommendation

(0) Thank | 索拉里斯

The first review resulted in recommendations and revisions, which were then significantly modified during the second review. However, the scores from the second review were approved some time ago but have been stuck in the "Awaiting AE Recommendation" status for half a month. Is this reasonable?

(0) Thank | Notorious Duck

Maybe AE thought it necessary to add more reviewers, or maybe there was a reviewer who hadn't reviewed the paper yet, so it was sent back for reevaluation.

(0) Thank | jeffreychan

Hey guys, can someone explain what's going on with this situation: Scores on April 15, changed to AE Recommendation on May 18, back to Scores that evening, and still Scores today...

(0) Thank | TJiofaeofnfe

Guys, may I ask what's going on with this situation: Scores on April 15, changed to AE Recommendation on May 18, back to Scores that same night, and still Scores today...

(0) Thank | TJiofaeofnfe

16-Mar-2025 submit
Awaiting Reviewer ...
Awaiting AE Recommendation
6.6 Awaiting Area AE Recommendation
6.12 Awaiting AE Recommendation

(0) Thank | NookLook

How are things going now?

(0) Thank | anson天天发trans

The manuscript was submitted in early February 2025 and accepted on June 11th. Each round of review was completed within 2 months, and after one major revision and one minor revision, it was successfully accepted.

Initial review: There were a total of six reviewers, including the Associate Editor, with approximately 30 comments.

Second review: Three reviewers accepted the manuscript, two requested minor revisions, and after the revisions, an additional reviewer was added. Fortunately, the manuscript was directly accepted.

Wishing everyone a smooth submission process and good luck!

(0) Thank | 一剑飘香

I can message you privately.

(0) Thank | jeffreychan

Can I add you for convenience? Can you leave a contact method, haha.

(0) Thank | 一剑飘香

I can't add your QQ, it shows that the operation is too frequent.

(0) Thank | jeffreychan

Can't even get a first-instance result in three months? This is so outrageous.

(0) Thank | 索拉里斯

Can you add me as a friend, brother? My QQ number is 1575866037.

(0) Thank | 一剑飘香

It has been 60 days since awaiting reviewer scores, and no response has been received. It has been 90 days since submission.

(0) Thank | stevensong

This is a new editor added last year, I encountered it and the reviewer reviewed it, then to area editor, and then to AE, mainly to provide suggestions on the technical aspects and innovative points of the paper.

(0) Thank | jeffreychan

Could you please tell me what results tend to come from this step? No one around here has ever seen this step before.

(0) Thank | 叶叶的小雨

I submitted my paper to AE yesterday, but a few hours later it was back to "awaiting reviewer scores". I'm not sure what happened.

(0) Thank | jeffreychan

I have also encountered this situation. May I ask if you were eventually hired?

(0) Thank | 一剑飘香

请提供需要翻译的内容。

(0) Thank | 一剑飘香

The new system for submissions is still directly UR, has it been reviewed or not??

(0) Thank | 小学渣

It's been 3 months since the first trial and still no result, I give up. There's no response even if I urge them.

(0) Thank | stevensong