The manuscript was submitted on April 29th and it was sent for review the next day. In mid-May, three reviewers recommended an acceptance after revision and two major revisions. It was returned after revision in mid-June. At the beginning of July, two reviewers recommended one acceptance and one major revision. But the editor was very good and required a minor revision. On July 11th, the revised manuscript was submitted and it was accepted the next day. ACS's journals process manuscripts very quickly, and the quality of the journals is relatively good. The editors were particularly good, and they helped me with problems.

(7) Thank | Dr.

Atmospheric Chemistry. I have submitted two papers. Both review comments were returned within 1 month (about 2 weeks) of submission. The comments were very professional. Each time about 1 month was given for revision. The first paper underwent a major revision, and the second paper underwent a major revision and a minor revision. The two papers have been published. In general, I feel that the quality of the papers in this journal is very high. Its impact factor is 3.418 and it is a matter of time for further increases. You can try this journal for papers in this direction.

(12) Thank | ACS

I submitted it on June 13, minor revision was requested on July 30, and it was accepted on August 12. The impact factor newly released must be limited, but the content is still good, it is basically to catch up with the level of ES.

(3) Thank | 2/3 Observer

11-26 correct the following errors
11-27 submitted

(0) Thank | 年青的青年

Note down: 
2024-11-26 submitted

(0) Thank | 年青的青年

Make a note, submitted in early July 2024. First submission to ACS, hoping it will be faster than Elsevier.

(0) Thank | 哎哟嘟嘟嘟

The application submitted on January 1, 2024 is still Under Review as of January 3. The chances are not looking very promising

(0) Thank | Adela2

It seems that the journals of the American Chemical Society have been on the decline in recent years, except for a few like JACS

(0) Thank | lunwenfabiao

Not oa, free.

(0) Thank | SKr----

How much does this journal charge?

(0) Thank | 梦芷雪

2023.1.13 Submission;
2023.2.14 Major repair;
2023.3.14 Rework;
2023.4.6 Acceptance.

(0) Thank | Buenos ，Aires

Révision soumise le 13 mars 2023. 

Translation: Revision submitted on March 13, 2023.

(0) Thank | Buenos ，Aires

Status: Under Review
Submitted on 13 January 2023
Just making a note, wishing for good luck.

(0) Thank | Argentina

A small issue that has been closely followed for a long time. It took a total of 70 days from submission to receiving the first review comments, and both reviewers suggested minor revisions. The editor gave 15 days for the revisions. After submitting again, it took two more days to make formatting changes, and it was finally accepted the next day. ACS's journals have a good reputation, but it seems that they have not yet reached the expected results since their launch.

(1) Thank | 一刀倾城

0806 Submitted
0807 Associate Editor Assigned
0810 Associate Editor Assigned
0817 In Peer Review
0907 Minor Revision (9.20 deadline)
0915 Revision submitted
0915 Associate Editor Assigned
0916 In Peer Review
0919 Revision requested (format modification)
0920 Accepted
The speed is quite fast, and the editor is Liu Chongxuan from South University of Science and Technology. This article has gone through ups and downs. After being rejected by Water Research, it was resubmitted to WR after supplementary experiments were conducted according to the reviewers' comments, but it was rejected again. Then it was submitted to Sci. Total Environ., EP, and Chemosphere, but none of them were reviewed. Finally, it was submitted to this ACS journal in the field of geochemistry. The quality of this new journal is good at the beginning, and many industry experts have published articles in it. However, the influence of geochemistry journals is limited, and the impact factor is estimated to not increase for a while. Therefore, it was ultimately chosen to be published in this journal due to the recognition of ACS's reputation.

(0) Thank | 一飞冲天

When the new journal first came out, the quality of the articles was very high and was on par with many articles in the EST (Environmental Science and Technology) journal. However, possibly due to its lower ranking in the Chinese Academy of Sciences division, the recent articles have started to vary in quality, with some indeed being at the level of third-tier journals. I wonder if this journal can continue to improve and advance further.

(3) Thank | 三叶草iii

I thought it would be fast. After sending it, the editorial department did indeed review it quickly, but it took almost half a year to receive a reply, and there was only one expert opinion, suggesting major revisions. After the major revisions, it took about one month to be accepted.

The editorial department is quite good. Previously, the format I uploaded was not correct, but they patiently sent emails asking me to modify the format before resubmitting.

(0) Thank | 夏雨雪

The supervisor highly values this journal and comments on its future: there is no reason for it to not be famous. Submitted on May 19th, two minor revisions were requested on June 28th, a response was given on July 8th, and it was accepted on July 12th. The journal's review process is surprisingly fast.

(28) Thank | 2/3 Observer

Although the current impact factor is average, the prospects feel very promising, and many influential figures in the field recommend this journal.

(0) Thank | 风雨无阻+++

After several experts believed that the data mining was not sufficient, the editors suggested submitting the paper with their replies to this journal. After carefully responding to the EST editorial comments, the paper was resubmitted. The editor was good and also sent it to the previous EST reviewers. The review process was fast, with a response received within two weeks, and the replies were satisfactory. With a few minor suggestions, the paper was accepted within a week upon resubmission.

(30) Thank | 风雨无阻+++