Update of retrieval time information after acceptance of the article: 2019.5.27: Registered the author information, submitted the manuscript; 2019.5.28: The editorial office sent us an email to verify the author’s information (Note: the authors’ institutional mailboxes should be used); 2019.6.1: Editorial office confirmed that the author’s replies were received; 2019.6.23: I guessed that the manuscript had been with editor for so long, and we reconfirmed the accuracies of identity information of the contributors; 2019.7.1: The editorial office has assigned reviewers to review the article; 2019.7.18: Review comments returned, suggesting a minor revision; 2019.7.21: I submitted the revised manuscript and revision explanations; 2019.7.24: The article was accepted at 5:30 pm, and we uploaded the final manuscript and related information; 2019.7.25: Uploaded the required documents and paid the page fee of $1990, and the system displayed waiting for editing and publication. Note: I heard that the current page fee is $2200. September 2019: it can be retrieved on Web of Science in September, and I had a retrieval certificate issued in the library. Friends who encounter problems with submissions can also consult me (email: 17364522496@163.com), as well as the detailed process of individual software copyright application and patent applications, etc. can be discussed! Hope it helps everyone.

(13) Thank | LMXR

The review required me to revise. However, there is only one reviewer in the system, is it normal? The only thing raised by the reviewer was completely wrong, and he said the idea in not novel (I hope you will be prepared to undertake this, and I will then be pleased to reconsider the manuscript for publication. Please note that due to the refusal recommendation of the reviewer, it will need to be sent out for re-review. If you do decide to revise the paper, submit the revised version of your manuscript no later than October 20, 2020). However, because the editor has said these words, shouldn’t I give up?

(0) Thank | 游轮

The service is very good, and the speed is also very fast, especially since one review took less than two months to report the results. There is a disadvantage: the impact factor is 0.827.

(2) Thank | Caption_C

It has been published and indexed, but no payment has been made. What will happen if payment is not made?

(0) Thank | 天外丶有天

Hello, any updates on the article? How long until it is reviewed? I submitted it 17 days ago, is it still in the queue?

(0) Thank | 赵

It's really spicy. The journal has been reviewed repeatedly, revised repeatedly, and revised four or five times. It has been going on for 11 months. This time, just a minor revision to fix some formatting issues, and it has to go back for another round of review. It's open access, but still so expensive and so spicy.

(0) Thank | 天外丶有天

It has been six months in total, and progress has been slow. There have been many journal-related matters, and although the responses to reminders for submission have been timely and official, there has been no progress. If you are in a hurry, it is advisable to be cautious before submitting.

(0) Thank | ε＝ε＝ε＝(#>д<)ﾉ

Journal submission, editors too.

(0) Thank | 保国大师

I'm speechless. It's been almost a year, and there's still no sign of progress. I don't understand what the editor-in-chief and deputy editor are doing every day. A broken open-source journal doesn't even know its own name. I don't recommend submitting to this journal anymore. Two words: **.

(0) Thank | 保国大师

Is this too exaggerated? I've paid the fee and still haven't seen the publication? I submitted my article in August last year, it was reviewed by 2 reviewers and then sent back for revisions, and then an additional 4 reviewers were involved. It was really exhausting, I immediately submitted the revised article. The experience with this journal is not very friendly, considering we have to pay for their services and yet the quality is so poor.

(0) Thank | Johny

It's been almost a year since being hired, but the publication has not been released yet. Every time I follow up with the editorial department, they respond promptly, but there has been no progress. I wonder what the reason could be. Has anyone else experienced a similar situation?

(0) Thank | 大海寒剑

I want to submit an article. Do you have the correct submission link? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 王丽

Submitted on: 05 Feb 2024, today is March 24, still Academic Editor: Unassigned, what does this mean?

(0) Thank | 深蓝

It's been almost a month, and it's still Unassigned. What's going on?

(0) Thank | 深蓝

The first review took 3 months to hear back, which is a decent speed; the second review said they were inviting reviewers, it's been 4 months and still nothing. I will never submit to this journal again, it's too slow

(0) Thank | Johny

It took two months to make the final decision although everything else was fine

(0) Thank | Deier

Except for the time it took for the editor to make the final decision (two months), everything else was fine

(0) Thank | Deier

Classmate, what is your current status now? My submission has been in an unassigned status for over two months, and it shows "withdraw" in the top right corner. What is going on?

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈9

I have been waiting for almost two months

(0) Thank | Deier

Any news? I've also been waiting for the editor-in-chief to decide, it's been almost two months

(0) Thank | Deier

Any news? I am also waiting for the editor-in-chief's decision, it's been almost two months

(0) Thank | Deier

Is it taking longer for the decision to be made after the rework? I have been waiting for a month and a half, and the editorial assistant keeps saying they are still making a decision /(ㄒoㄒ)/~~

(0) Thank | Deier

2.5 months for major revisions
Received acceptance one week after resubmission
Feeling hesitant to pay the publication fee due to recent Hindawi scandal

(0) Thank | GJ$

2.20 Submitted 
2.25~6 End of June Under review 
7.4 Revision requested (Reviewer 1, minor revisions returned on April 3; Reviewer 2, major revisions returned on June 8) 
7.13 Response to reviewer comments 
7.22 Refused to Consider (Reviewer 1, approval for publication returned on July 14; Reviewer 2, approval for publication returned on July 21; Academic Editor approved publication), also received rejection email 
7.25 Sent first email to editor inquiring about the situation, asking why reviewers agreed but the article was rejected 
7.25 Received email from editor stating that relevant departments are investigating 
8.8 Sent second email to editor inquiring about the situation, requesting investigation timeline 
8.8 Received email from Quality Checker stating that relevant departments are investigating, no additional information provided 
9.7 Sent third email inquiring about the situation and emphasizing the urgency of the manuscript 
9.8 Received same response, no other information 
10.6 Sent fourth email to editor requesting withdrawal of manuscript and halt of investigation 
As of 10.13, no response from editor has been received

(5) Thank | 冰西瓜好好吃

Excuse me, who is the editor-in-chief of this journal? Urgent

(0) Thank | 姜达