Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Advances in Manufacturing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | ADV MANUF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 2095-3127 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 2195-3597 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 5.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/40436 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/manu/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600 , NEW YORK, United States, NY, 10004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Materials Science | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | United States | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | 4 issues per year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2095-3127%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Advances in Manufacturing: | Write a review |
Author: 晓强强 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-05-16 13:48:10 This journal helped me realize my dream of scientific research and drew a successful end to my graduate graduation, but the waiting process was also very painful. I am here to redeem my wish. The experts and editors were very responsible. The journal will help polish the article after acceptance. It is a responsible journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 睿智先生 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-23 20:59:09 Is this for real??? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 桂圆Ge Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-23 13:15:53 The review speed is acceptable, but the time to send the final acceptance notice is too long. The second round was completed in March, but the acceptance notice was not sent until November. ![]() ![]() |
Author: GreenBook Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-06 11:09:46 The Grass Stage team's editorial department publishes around 50 articles per year, but their processing speed is extremely slow. It is not recommended to submit articles, as it is unclear what this group of people in the editorial department is doing. ![]() ![]() |
Author: shine0318 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-07 23:57:41 Which email did you send to? I have been waiting for more than two months now, and I have sent emails to the editorial department to urge the process, but have not received any response. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 我的未来不是梦 Subject Area: 材料科学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-03 21:44:15 Submission on December 9, 2023 Major revision on January 9, 2024, six reviewers, three minor revisions, three major revisions Revised on February 15, 2024 Minor revision on August 1, 2024 Accepted on September 2, 2024 ![]() ![]() |
Author: 李光羽 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-02 09:48:09 Hello, I would like to ask why after online submission, the system will duplicate the "fig" once in the automatically generated PDF, resulting in something like: Fig. Fig. 1. ![]() ![]() |
Author: UPMC-身高1米88杨居儒 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-05-09 10:15:44 Submitted, looking forward to rejection ![]() ![]() |
Author: Lllllll-Y Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-01-26 14:53:00 Submitted in April of the 23rd year, revised in July, accepted in November ![]() ![]() |
Author: ccss1 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-01-20 10:08:16 I applied in May for the end of August minor repair, and received an email in October saying that I have been hired. However, it was not until January 3, 2024 that the system showed the acceptance. I estimate that it will be around February when it gets published, as there are generally only 4 journals per month ![]() ![]() |
Author: wsl_st Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-06-22 13:43:40 Could you please tell me how your paper turned out in the end? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 94992 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-12-12 10:17:18 Submitted in March, received 5 suggestions for minor revisions in May and made the necessary modifications. Waited for 7 months without any updates. Suddenly in December, it went back under review. Originally, I had hoped to have this article accepted and present it for my graduation defense at the end of the year, but now I realize that it won't be possible. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小涞涞 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-10-20 12:08:13 The journal you mentioned actually coincided with the severe epidemic situation in Shanghai. Unfortunately, my paper was accepted in April, but it has not been processed yet due to the epidemic and summer vacation. So, this situation also exists. I feel that this journal is still good. ![]() ![]() |
Author: suhao_sdu Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-07-14 09:10:45 My experience of submitting this manuscript can be considered unheard of. Let me first explain the final outcome of this submission: it has been accepted and proofread! At the end of May, after being rejected, I resubmitted to another journal. Then, in early June, a teacher from that journal called me and said there was a mistake. It was supposed to be accepted, but it was accidentally marked as rejected (speechless). The status on the submission system changed to "accept". I hurriedly withdrew the submission from the other journal (the consequences would have been unimaginable if I hadn't done it in time). After that, I received the proofreading email from this journal after a month. It took nearly a year from submitting at the end of last year until now, and it has been quite a struggle. However, fortunately, the result is good. I sincerely hope that domestic journals in China can catch up with international excellent journals and become highly recognized international journals soon! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 认真的rain Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-07-12 02:27:53 2021.8.12 New submission 2021.8.14 Editor assigned 2021.8.16 Editor assigned 2021.8.20 Reviewers assigned 2021.8.21 Under review 2021.9.23 Reviewers assigned 2021.9.23 Under review 2021.9.28 Under review 2021.11.28 Reviews completed 2021.11.28 Editor assigned 2021.11.28 Revise 2021.12.06 Revision submitted 2021.12.07 Reviewers assigned 2021.12.07 Under review 2021.12.15 Under review 2021.12.22 Reviews completed Editor contact afterwards to request the original text in Word format for proofreading 2021.6.29 Accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: 素忆平生 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-07-05 18:00:38 Continue to wait. Waited for another two weeks and found that the review was completed. The next day at noon, received an email, reject. Checked the review comments, there were two reviewers. One suggested minor revisions (about 3 comments), and one directly rejected. Focused on the comments of rejection, the opinions were quite general, basically criticizing the entire paper. They said my English was not good and the paper was not fluent to read (in fact, I had someone proofread it). They mentioned that the theoretical part lacked innovation and the conclusion highlight was not clear. They hoped that I could provide some evaluation indicators that are currently hard to find among scholars worldwide. And the most frustrating part was that, regarding a certain indicator, the reviewer thought I did not provide the calculation method, but actually, the formula was right above the indicator graph. Therefore, from my limited understanding, I feel that what he said is not what I intended to convey. After half a day, received an email from the editorial department suggesting transferring the paper to other journals. They recommended a total of 5 journals, 3 open-access, 1 non-English journal, and a well-known domestic journal with a long review time. Decisively rejected the transfer suggestion. I initially wanted to refute the second reviewer, but referring to the outcome of the previous reviewer, chances are it will still be rejected. You can consider everything I said as my personal opinion, feel free to take it or leave it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 素忆平生 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-07-05 17:59:52 There's nothing much to say. I deliberately registered an account hoping that visitors could take a look at my situation and decide for themselves. The homepage of the journal website displays an enticing feedback speed of "8 days", but it's not actually that fast. I submitted my article at the end of April and it was sent for review 2 days later. The first reviewer should have provided feedback around one month later, but the system time changed. I then waited for another 2 months without any updates. I used the system to inquire about the progress with the editor, but they didn't reply after receiving the system message. However, the system time changed 4 days after sending the message, so it seems they checked the situation. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 我爱如月 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-06-29 14:51:46 Thumbs up for these excellent domestic journals! ![]() ![]() |
Author: suhao_sdu Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-06-01 09:44:12 Add another sentence. After being rejected and transferred for a week, the transfer button is still greyed out and cannot be clicked. I can't see the rejection letter on the website either, so I don't know the reason for the rejection. It's really interesting! ![]() ![]() |
Author: suhao_sdu Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-05-28 21:13:14 Amazing! Submitted in November 2021, revised in mid-January 2022 (with about 2 reviewers and 5 comments), quickly made the revisions, and by the end of February, it showed "Reviews Completed". However, the status remained unchanged until one day at the end of May, it showed "Editor Assigned". Just a few days later, it was rejected and transferred!!! I sent an email during this period but didn't receive a response. After the rejection, no email was sent, I found out by opening the website myself! Thumbs up to this journal!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 磊仔 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-11-27 13:17:44 I want to ask if this journal is open access, and if there are any publication fees. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 不完美的上帝 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-04-17 18:44:25 Why isn't anyone commenting? ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |