Now it’s the second article. It was under review a day after submission. Generally speaking, it is ok if only you answer the questions raised by the reviewers seriously. It is a very friendly journal!

(2) Thank | Jamesliuhd

The review comments returned in half a month. A lot of comments were given but revision was required. The reviewers can still put forward good comments. After the major revision was returned, the minor revision was required in 4 days, and it was accepted directly after the minor revision was submitted. The efficiency is very high. The charge for OA is $1650.

(0) Thank | 糖球

Received on 18 November 2019; Decision Letter Revise on 04 December 2019; Received in revised form on 14 January 2020; Accepted on 21 January 2020.

(0) Thank | Tshan

Has your status changed now? I am still with Editor, it has been 6 days already.

(0) Thank | wx

The submission was made on December 19, 2024, and is currently still in the "Submitted" status as the editor went on Christmas break.

(0) Thank | 李达页

After the major revision, the two minor revisions were sent back to the original two reviewers. Did yours get rejected by the original reviewers after being sent back? Although this journal reviews very strictly, having 11 reviewers is just too much, isn't it?

(0) Thank | 乖祭

After returning from one round of major revisions, how long did it take for you to receive the second round of minor revisions? It has been a month and a half for me, and after returning from major revisions, I have sent the manuscript to 11 reviewers for approval. Currently, one reviewer has not finished reviewing it yet, and it doesn't feel like the same reviewers as before. Have you experienced this situation before?

(0) Thank | 盖锅头坚

Submitted on July 4, 2024
One major revision
Two minor revisions
Accepted on December 8, 2024

Feedback: Overall, after the major revision, the quality of the article has significantly improved. The two reviewers provided good suggestions on the writing style and content of the mini-paper. After the revisions, I feel clearer about the routine of writing English papers. Overall, the journal has strict control over the quality of papers, and I hope it can be promoted to the first zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The submission process took 5 months, which is not fast, but it is still acceptable if not in a hurry.

(0) Thank | 乖祭

Submitted on July 4, 2024
One major revision
Two minor revisions
Accepted on August 17, 2024
Feedback: Overall, I felt a significant improvement in the quality of the article after the major revision. The two reviewers provided good suggestions on the writing style and content of the short paper, and I personally feel that the routine for writing English papers is now clearer. Overall, the journal seems to have strict control over the quality of the papers. I look forward to the journal being listed in the top 1% of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The submission process took 5 months, which is not particularly fast, but it is still acceptable if there is no rush.

(0) Thank | 乖祭

May I ask if the first revision will be sent back to the original reviewer? I have now resubmitted to 7 people for revision, but only one person has accepted the review after two weeks. I feel like it may not have been sent back to the original reviewer, otherwise why would I have to send it to so many people?

(0) Thank | 盖锅头坚

Submitted on September 15th, accepted on November 20th, with one major revision in between to accommodate the reviewers' feedback. If not for that, the decision would have been made in just two months. The author is generalizing based on one instance.

(0) Thank | sunxiaobai

Whether to say it or not, the speed of this journal is slower than a turtle. Graduates in a hurry should be cautious when submitting.

(0) Thank | Daniel2024

Huh? Isn't this related to the reviewer? What does it have to do with the journal?

(0) Thank | Aaaa

This is a trashy journal, not recommended for submission. It is extremely slow and requires a lot of revisions. After you make the revisions, they will tell you that your submission is not suitable for this journal.

(0) Thank | 书生

My 8000 has been used in UR.

(0) Thank | Aaaa

Does this journal have a word limit of 6000, boss?

(0) Thank | 学习的大冰奶

Why always with editor?

(0) Thank | Aaaa

Submitted on 7.22 with editor, hoping for good luck.

(0) Thank | Aaaa

During the second revision, the reviewer was okay, but the editor raised some more opinions. After making the modifications and resubmitting, it has been in "with editor" status for over ten days. Feeling a bit anxious, have any experienced experts encountered this situation before?

(0) Thank | luna~

A very good journal, experts' opinions greatly improve the quality of the papers, and I will submit again if I have suitable manuscripts.

(1) Thank | 科研狗狗.

Submitted to the system on March 17th, received first review comments on April 20th, submitted to the system again on May 17th, RRC on May 27th, and the result of the second review is unknown

(0) Thank | 93秦先生

The second review, almost a month has passed, but it still hasn't disappeared, making me extremely anxious

(0) Thank | luna~

Hello, just wanted to check in on the status of your article

(0) Thank | CORAL801

Submitted on March 17th
Received email about the tracking number on March 19th
Peer review completed on April 18th, RRC, with 2 reviewers
Decision in Principal on April 21st
Hoping for good luck

(0) Thank | 93秦先生

Has your status changed? I have always been with editor

(0) Thank | liuguan