Submitted on March 3; major revision required on March 24; revision submitted on May 7; accepted on May 16. The journal is still relatively former, the impact factor is average, but the speed is quite fast. It is suitable for graduation.

(5) Thank | zzzjh

Submitted on March 3; major revision required on March 24; revision submitted on May 7; accepted on May 16. The journal is still relatively formal, the impact factor is average, but the speed is quite fast. It is suitable for graduation.

(5) Thank | zzzjh

Please ask your supervisor or other relevant personnel for recommendations

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

As the level of specialization in academic disciplines increases, it becomes difficult for journals to find suitable peer review experts. Therefore, requesting authors to recommend reviewers is a mutually beneficial practice: journals can find suitable reviewers and save time searching for them, while authors can provide support through their own contact network and recommend scholars who can best understand the submitted papers

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

I don't know any experts, can I still make a recommendation?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

What is a recommended reviewer/expert/peer?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

This magazine typically takes two months for the first round of review. Have you requested an expedited review this time? Did the editor reply?

(0) Thank | 娅静小哥哥

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 95.0 | Page charge: 400.0 
Research focus: Stem cells 
Experience: The review speed is slow, taking 3 months from submission to the first round of revisions, and 4 more months from revision to acceptance. It takes several more months to see the publication. The editor does not respond to emails and I will not submit again

(0) Thank | 璃月意映