The review speed is really fast, and the reviewers and editors are also very good. The paper is written for the project. If it is returned for revision, and you revise it seriously, the acceptance rate is still quite high, which is much better than some domestic core journals. Received Date: 21 March 2020; Revised Date: 28 April 2020; Accepted Date: 2 May 2020. It underwent a revision required by the editor and revision suggested by the editor.

(3) Thank | 17777

2020.2.15 submitted; 2020.3.9 rejected; 2020.4.3 resubmitted; 2020.4.17 minor revision; 2020.4.19 revised version; 2020.4.21 accepted. Processes. The publication review speed was relatively fast. The first submission was rejected, mainly because the paper was relatively rough, but the two reviewing experts were still very serious, and the comments were in place. They gave many good opinions and suggestions, and the paper was rejected gently. I made major revisions on the basis of reviewing expert suggestions. The second time the manuscript was submitted, and a detailed point-to-point response was given. The original two expert reviews gave a good evaluation and also put forward suggestions for further improvement. After minor revisions and point-to-point responses, it was accepted soon. Generally speaking, the review speed of the journal was very fast, and the assistant editor and editor-in-chief were also very patient. After the second submission, the editor-in-chief personally arranged and contacted us to praise their service. However, the page fee has also risen year by year, which is a bit expensive. I hope that the journal will continue to work harder and run better, and the impact factor in 2019 will be even higher.

(2) Thank | zgdsxf

It’s true that the journal’s review speed was fast, and it’s also absolutely true that the journal has a strong demand for manuscripts, or it will not accept all the papers. But the quality of the paper, I really disagree. My junior male fellow’s paper was submitted to this journal (his paper was really not good). After sending for review, the reviewer was quite serious and responsible, who directly pointed out all the problems of the paper, including the low innovation and the fundamental problems of the theory. There were about dozens of reviewers’ comments. The reviewers were really responsible, and they must have read the article carefully for the questions they asked were really convincing. The problem was that with a proposal for rejection of the manuscript, the editor still requested a major revision, which was really a situation I have never seen before. What’s more, because there were too many reviewers’ comments and fundamental problems have been raised, some of these comments cannot be answered at all. The junior summed up a few replies symbolically, and submitted them without a point-to-point response. The revised submission was accepted directly the next day, without even sending for the second review. I can’t say that all the papers included were bad, but this experience shows that this journal is either short of articles or lack of money. But no matter what it is, if you want to be better in the future, you should perform more formally!

(74) Thank | Sigma

Processes was only included in SCIE last year. The review was really fast, and the feedback was given in 10 days. My paper required minor revisions, and after this was completed, the reviewer refused to accept my revised paper because he was not in my field, so he did not understand my article. I then appealed, the editor agreed to my appeal, and then found a third reviewer. I went back and forth for two months. It was finally published. This journal is really fast, but the page fee has also risen very quickly.

(4) Thank | ma*******17@126.com

The submission made on 3.28 is still under review. I emailed the editor to inquire about the progress but have not received a response. I have a feeling it may be rejected.

(0) Thank | 卡布

I have added you, please pay attention to the messages.

(0) Thank | yy

Those who have added me as a friend, I have accepted and sent a message, please check your inbox.

(0) Thank | yy

Do you have any coupons? Thank you!

(0) Thank | HXD974287503

After giving a major overhaul, the next step is pending major revision.

(0) Thank | 录用Accept

Please note that the APC is already CHF 2400. 
https://www.mdpi.com/apc

(0) Thank | 粒粒山楂丸

Is the submission status always under review before receiving the review comments?

(0) Thank | 卡布

Just received the news of major revisions on April 21st, with three reviewers - one rejection and two major revisions, with a deadline of 10 days.

(0) Thank | 录用Accept

Hello, I wanted to ask if your status has changed. I invested around the same time as you, but I haven't heard anything yet.

(0) Thank | 卡布

Hey buddy, have you ever submitted to Scientific Reports before?

(0) Thank | 录用Accept

Reject and resubmit, today Accepted to update the 3.8 resubmission. 
4.1 received reviewer comments, initially rejected by 3 reviewers, now 2, given one week for major revisions. 
4.7 revised and resubmitted. 
4.11 Pending decision. 
4.18 Accepted.

(0) Thank | 朝朝暮山

Teachers and students can contact me for exemption from the application fee for the quota.

(0) Thank | yy

You can add me next time for submission and I will help you apply.

(0) Thank | 学渣二狗

There is no email, and no place to add WeChat, so communication is a bit difficult even though it is in China. Accepted on April 4th, payment made on April 7th, additional materials requested on April 9th, and English correction completed on April 10th.

(0) Thank | Areskaka

Why didn't you add me on WeChat for editing?

(0) Thank | 学渣二狗

April Fool's Day, Ped returned a suggestion, thanking for making modifications to the other suggestions.

(0) Thank | Areskaka

12 submissions
24 major revisions
29 submissions for now rvr
The discount assistant editor has not read the application twice, forget it, hope to hire 2400 francs.

(0) Thank | Areskaka

Submitted on March 25th, currently under review. Could I ask how long it will take to receive the initial review feedback?

(0) Thank | 录用Accept

The submission was made on February 17th, and the reviewers' comments were received on the 27th. There were two reviewers who suggested major revisions, but the issues were not difficult to address. The revisions were completed and submitted on March 6th, and on March 8th, the decision was pending from the editor. Finally, on March 10th, the paper was accepted. This information is provided for your reference.

(0) Thank | Hellow,tomorrow

Received Date
17 February 2025
Revised Date
4 March 2025
Accepted Date
10 March 2025

(0) Thank | Hellow,tomorrow

What is the repetition rate of this journal?

(0) Thank | 王大官人