If your articles are innovative, generally there will be results within 3 months. I submitted two articles and both received results in about 70 days.

(5) Thank | clown111111

2019.3.29, submission; 2019.4.15, under review; 2019.6.7, review submitted; 2019.6.9, rejected but allowed to be resubmitted after revision (three reviewers, one rejection, one major revision and one acceptance); 2019.11.10, resubmitted; 2019.12.19, major revision; (the editor found the fourth review expert directly, and the review suggested major revision or rejection); 2020.2.29, the revision submitted; 2020.3.30, accepted. It was my first time to submit article to SCI journal. The requirements of the journal in Q2 were relatively high. I am still lacking in experience, and it was because of my insistence that the article was accepted. It took one year in total; however, it was a happy ending. The editor was super responsible, and try his best to let me revise it instead of rejecting it, and gave me various tips. Although the fourth reviewer didn’t give a high evaluation, he paid attention to the words and didn’t depress me. I can only say that I was so lucky. The submission of this article really made me learn a lot.

(2) Thank | 学术界菜鸟

Very slow. The editor was very dilatory. The peer review process lasted 145 day. Directly rejected… Moreover, the editor was very irresponsible.

(3) Thank | 8k娃娃

When did the OP submit the manuscript? How long did it take from submission to review?

(0) Thank | docv

You are already very fast. As for me, it's been seven months and I haven't finished yet. I estimate it will be done soon. It's considered fast if you can finish this journal in half a year from start to finish.

(0) Thank | docv

I gave the revisions back two months ago, but there has been no progress. I had to urge them numerous times before they finally submitted the revised draft for review. One of the reviewers has not provided any feedback yet. I guess it will be ready soon. It has been seven months.

(0) Thank | docv

Please translate the following paragraph into English: The number of reviewers for manuscript evaluation has been increased from one person to two people.

(0) Thank | 果怡宝

It's really slow, with 5 reviewers providing 3 feedbacks, waited for 1-2 weeks, and now it's back to "with editor" for almost 2 weeks...

(0) Thank | 果怡宝

It's so slow, finally submitted for review after two weeks. Only 3 reviewers were invited, and it's been 20 days without any reviews or inviting new reviewers.

(0) Thank | BBQya

Hello, have you been hired now?

(0) Thank | jiajia

What does this arrow mean?

(0) Thank | ssagw

It's been 2 weeks, and stj hasn't moved at all.

(0) Thank | docv

How long does it usually take for stj to change to wd?

(0) Thank | docv

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for you to arrive in the editor's hands?

(0) Thank | 钟媛媛zyy

OP, may I ask what your current status is now?

(0) Thank | 钟媛媛zyy

How many reviewers are usually involved in the review process?

(0) Thank | abcd

It has been two weeks and my work still hasn't arrived at the editor's place.

(0) Thank | JQ

It's been two weeks and I still haven't heard back from the editor. I want to know how to withdraw my submission.

(0) Thank | JQ

The editing hasn't been processed yet, how can it be submitted for review? I have already withdrawn the manuscript, and just transferred it to Food Control. The editor sent it for review after just one week of initial screening.

(0) Thank | liaozhengrui

Didn't you submit it for approval?

(0) Thank | 随便投期刊了

Without moving a muscle, it has been two months. Really, be cautious.

(0) Thank | liaozhengrui

I have been in the editor's hands for two months without any progress, I am going to withdraw my submission.

(0) Thank | liaozhengrui

Are there any experts who have reviewed articles for this journal? How long does the editorial usually take for review?

(0) Thank | 随便投期刊了

What's up now, poster?

(0) Thank | 随便投期刊了

OP, how are you doing now?

(0) Thank | ZLK-Nice