Submitted on January 18, accepted on August 10. The process was relatively bumpy. There were three reviewers in the first review, and the comments were okay. I resubmitted it after earnestly answering them. However, one reviewer might be added for each round of revisions, and there were new review comments raised, which were revised three times before and after. There were 6 reviewers in total, and the editor said that he would reject it if the reviewers were still dissatisfied with the manuscript...

(2) Thank | 森森森

Being affected by the epidemic, from the submission of the manuscript in April, it was only in July that the first review comments of the two reviewers were received. They were all relatively positive. The editor required major revisions. The manuscript was returned 7 days later, it was accepted 3 days later, it was proofed on the same day, and it went online the next day. It was pretty fast at the later stage. This journal prefers the innovative researches in new fields.

(2) Thank | hands1103

The content of the article is about multi-omics study of medicinal fungi. The journal pays more attention to the novelty of article content. The editor is very responsible and the review cycle is short. After minor revisions, if the reviewers are satisfied with the revision, it generally can be online within one or two weeks.

(3) Thank | 喜捣捣

While there are many manuscripts in medical agronomy, there are not many engineering techniques. The results of the review are sent after one month.

(0) Thank | 风雪星月夜

It has been 47 days, and it has been in the hands of the deputy editor for five days.

(0) Thank | 木头1

What about the follow-up? Will there be an external audit?

(0) Thank | Joe

The document is still undergoing formatting review.

(0) Thank | 木头1

I am forty days old, and I have had one format review during this period.

(0) Thank | 木头1

Will this journal be dropped?

(0) Thank | 稿稿全中

Why are yours so fast, I haven't received any news about the one I submitted on the 3rd.

(0) Thank | 木头1

My technical review will take 3 days before it goes into the hands of the editor.

(0) Thank | 123wo

May I ask why my manuscript technical review only took 4 days and is now in the hands of the editor? I am worried that it might be rejected soon. (Because I see others usually have their manuscripts under technical review for a month before submission.)

(0) Thank | stephanie_1

I am not sure about the requirement for all co-authors to confirm their agreement to be listed as co-authors on the website for submissions. However, I made sure to handle this after the submission (during the technical review stage). All materials were prepared according to the official website requirements before submission. Therefore, I only waited for over a month during the technical review stage (possibly due to a large number of submissions). The manuscript was then passed on to the editor without being returned for revisions, and the editor decided to send it for review.

(0) Thank | Jeffery

Excuse me, does the author need all co-authors to confirm their consent to be listed as co-authors on the website for submission?

(0) Thank | 皮不卡啾啾

Submitted in mid-August, the technical review took a month, the process was slow, the early technical review stage did not count towards the submission time, only after the manuscript number was assigned, the system displayed it as the submission time.
Submitted for review in early October, 16 reviewers were invited, 4 accepted.
Review comments returned in mid-November, made appropriate revisions.
Sent back for re-review at the end of December, two reviewers accepted.
Second review ended at the end of January, editor decision, accepted.
Overall, perhaps there are too many submissions, editors are overwhelmed, but the review speed is faster compared to NC starting six months ago; default double-blind review, unlike some journals, with a big team's plan B; page charges are not low, but still less compared to NC, AS; current IF steadily improving, manuscript quality also increasing, especially the 23rd time entering zone 1, many are still watching, 25 steadily in zone 1, it will probably be even harder to submit in the future.

(0) Thank | Jeffery

Hello, I would like to ask, when submitting a manuscript, do all co-authors need to confirm their agreement to be listed as co-authors?

(0) Thank | 皮不卡啾啾

Do all co-authors need to confirm their agreement to be listed as co-authors for submission?

(0) Thank | 聚乙二醇

Can I ask if all co-authors need to confirm their agreement to be listed as co-authors when submitting a manuscript?

(0) Thank | 聚乙二醇

There was no second review, and the first review accepted minor revisions.

(0) Thank | marry

May I ask if there is a result now?

(0) Thank | 宇兰酱

It has been a week since RRC and still no news, feeling anxious.

(0) Thank | 温和的常常

Friend, how are you doing? I have been waiting for the manuscript review for six months and it is still under review. I am so frustrated, it has already delayed me for a year. Have you withdrawn your submission? My boss asked me to withdraw mine.

(0) Thank | 老人家

Accept good luck, hope to accept it.

(0) Thank | quyang

Specific animal experiment ethics approval numbers can be provided for Ethics.

(0) Thank | SunnyE

On February 6th, it was sent.

(0) Thank | 宇兰酱