Submitted on January 18, accepted on August 10. The process was relatively bumpy. There were three reviewers in the first review, and the comments were okay. I resubmitted it after earnestly answering them. However, one reviewer might be added for each round of revisions, and there were new review comments raised, which were revised three times before and after. There were 6 reviewers in total, and the editor said that he would reject it if the reviewers were still dissatisfied with the manuscript...

(2) Thank | 森森森

Being affected by the epidemic, from the submission of the manuscript in April, it was only in July that the first review comments of the two reviewers were received. They were all relatively positive. The editor required major revisions. The manuscript was returned 7 days later, it was accepted 3 days later, it was proofed on the same day, and it went online the next day. It was pretty fast at the later stage. This journal prefers the innovative researches in new fields.

(2) Thank | hands1103

The content of the article is about multi-omics study of medicinal fungi. The journal pays more attention to the novelty of article content. The editor is very responsible and the review cycle is short. After minor revisions, if the reviewers are satisfied with the revision, it generally can be online within one or two weeks.

(3) Thank | 喜捣捣

While there are many manuscripts in medical agronomy, there are not many engineering techniques. The results of the review are sent after one month.

(0) Thank | 风雪星月夜

Seize the opportunity to quickly distribute the dividends that are currently relatively good to invest.

(1) Thank | 洋芋豆

The Egyptian journal will have an impact factor exceeding 14 next year, with nearly 90% of the articles published this year coming from China. I wonder which brilliant mind was the first to pioneer this Pharaoh journal.

(1) Thank | sangbiao

Have you submitted it for review?

(0) Thank | poppyyy

Good journal

(0) Thank | David

Pending Technical Assessment to be submitted for review in 20 days,
But, what does "Review invitations sent: 2+" mean? Only two review invitations were sent??

(0) Thank | Ying-jlu

How long does it usually take to go from acceptance to online?

(0) Thank | lbsjwk

Does it really take a year to accept online?

(0) Thank | lbsjwk

June 5, 2025 First submission Pending Technical Assessment
June 28, 2025 10:22AM Rejected, suggested to revise and resubmit
July 2, 2025 Second submission Pending Technical Assessment
July 22, 2025 12:56AM With Editor
Will update on the status later, hoping the editor will send it for external review soon.

(0) Thank | JJXu1314

Roughly speaking, I calculated that this journal will review around 1000 submissions per month, and accept about 19 of them.

(1) Thank | 木头1

Good luck, good luck!!!

(0) Thank | axiang4u

Good luck！！！

(0) Thank | axiang4u

Submitted for review. Ten were submitted, three of which have been accepted for review. One has already been completed, taking only three days to review. Waiting for the other two.

(0) Thank | 木头1

How are things going now?

(0) Thank | Leon

Seeing a fellow classmate submitting to this magazine, I rejected the next day, thinking that this magazine would respond quickly. As a result... After I submitted, it has been Pending Technical Assessment for 5 days. Ahhhhh.

(0) Thank | Ying-jlu

The technical review has been going on for over ten days, is it necessary to send an email to inquire about it?

(0) Thank | 洋芋豆

We have been in the hands of the editor for two months.

(0) Thank | 木头1

It's just too slow, it's been seven or eight days, still under technical review, and the manuscript number has not been assigned.

(0) Thank | 洋芋豆

This journal is very good.

(0) Thank | 稿稿全中

Please be more specific.

(0) Thank | 洋芋豆

Please elaborate on the following statement.

(0) Thank | 洋芋豆

Don't just submit articles for the sake of it, whether it's one more or one less, it doesn't matter!

(0) Thank | 黑竹