TCC processed the manuscript very quickly; the reviewers’ opinions are pertinent, and they can hit the point. Record the timeline of the review for your reference: submission: December 22, 2019; major revision required: two major revisions and one minor revision; March 12, 2020; after revision was made, it was returned on April 14, 2020; accept：May 14, 2020.

(5) Thank | ctding

@zengyue A minor revision, two major revisions were recommended on my manuscript, and the editor required major revision. Excuse me, what files do you need to submit after a major revision? Did you just submit the revised manuscript and response letter to the revision comments? My manuscript will exceed 14 pages if I revise according to the modification suggestions. The original manuscript was so long that I saved evidence as appendices. Now it needs supplement experiments and relevant data, and I don’t know how to revise!

(1) Thank | 水哥

This is the top journal in the field of cloud computing. Review speed can be regarded as very fast in transactions series. Just share it here. My first submission was sent for review on May 6, and the result came back on August 11, requiring for major revision. After revised for one month, it was submitted in September and then accepted on October 12. It took 5 months and 6 days in total. The person in charge of the journal is absolutely serious and the processing speed is absolutely fast. It is an excellent journal and is especially worth recommending! One article of my senior female fellow was also accepted, and it took more than 6 months to make a major revision and a minor revision. It was really fast enough, and the reviewers were also very serious and responsible!

(3) Thank | zengyue

Cloud computing top journals, the impact factor was so high in the first year.

(0) Thank | hamming

The first instance judgment has not come back yet, it has been over seven months.

(0) Thank | 试试菜市场

How long does it take for the final review to receive feedback?

(0) Thank | 当时明月

It's been two whole months, and it's still under review. What would be an appropriate way to expedite the process?

(0) Thank | 当时明月

The first instance will take about two months to return the verdict.

(0) Thank | accept！！！！！

May I ask how long after you submitted your manuscript did you receive the first revision feedback? It has been over a month for me and the status has always been "Under review" without any changes. (sad)

(0) Thank | xxtd

It took four months from submission to acceptance, with two major revisions in between. Each time, there were three reviewers, and the editing process was very fast.

(0) Thank | accept！！！！！

2024.11.14 Reject

2024.11.14 拒绝

(0) Thank | ziyerong19

Submitted on July 18, 2024, status is "under review" 
Followed up twice during the review process
November 13, 2024, with Associate Editor

(0) Thank | ziyerong19

Does anyone know the page limit for the initial draft of this journal 3217?

(0) Thank | wzhzzz

It's been a month, only ADM has been assigned. What's going on? The status is Under review, with a capital U and a lowercase r.

(0) Thank | 试试菜市场

Please make a note, 09.1 stj.

(0) Thank | 试试菜市场

I have been Under Review (小R) for a month now. Does that mean it has been sent back to the editorial department?

(0) Thank | ziyerong19

May I ask how long it took to review? Was it rejected by the editor?

(0) Thank | sheeperyang

The refusal was quite prompt

(0) Thank | sdnucxs

Hello, have you marked the changes in your response and revision drafts with colors?

(0) Thank | fantastica

I want to ask, did you mark the modifications made in the response to the editor and the revised manuscript with different colors?

(0) Thank | 网往狠

Brothers, what kind of replies did you receive when you rushed for the manuscript? Let's add each other as friends and communicate.

(0) Thank | eric678

It has been 11 months already, and the status is still "Under review." I have been pushing for an update every month, but it hasn't been helpful. Brothers who are in a hurry, please consider carefully before applying...

(0) Thank | JamesBD

After an 8-month long trial, one reviewer gave a rejection, but they must recommend their method to me.

(0) Thank | silkyrose

First review took over 9 months, with two reviewers. One gave minor revisions and the other rejected it outright. The comments from the rejecting reviewer were rubbish and completely unconvincing. They questioned some commonly used models, but if they didn't understand, they could have asked for clarification. These reviewers are truly frustrating. Maybe it's because the editor has been constantly pushing them, and they are getting impatient. Let's submit it to another journal! (PS: It's possible that the editor has been constantly reminding the reviewers, and they are getting a bit impatient.)

(0) Thank | xing

The first review took 9 months, but the situation finally changed today. With an Associate Editor, the journal review process is too long.

(0) Thank | xing