2019/10/31 submitted to journal; 2019/11/01 with editor; 2019/11/6 under review; 2019/12/11 major revision (Major revisions were given by all authors); 2020/01/04 the revised manuscript (R1) was submitted; 2020/02/18 major revision (one of the reviewers raised a lot of questions). Due to the COVID-19, I postponed the manuscript for two months. 2020/05/30 the second revised manuscript (R2) was submitted; 2020/06/19 pre-accepted. I needed to modify the format; 2020/06/24 formally accepted, prepared to proof. A particularly good journal. The reviewers seemed to be a knowledgeable authority. The quality of the article has improved a lot after the revision. The editor was very friendly and efficient, and the entire major revision process accompanied by the epidemic, which challenged my personal mentality, but the efforts were not wasted. In 2020 IF is 19.75. I hope it rushes to more than 20 next year as Nature Chemistry. Come on!

(50) Thank | jmppp

19/02/18, submission; 19/03/12, rejected. Three reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, and one rejection; 19/05/11, resubmitted after revision, many mechanism experiments and simulations were supplemented; 19/05/30, major revision. Two of the previous three reviewers accepted it, the third one continued to reject the manuscript; the fourth reviewer arbitrated and requested to make major revision; 19/06/13, revision was submitted; 19/06/19, accepted. The comments of reviewers were very constructive. The rejection reason given by the one who rejected the manuscript was also very reasonable.

(38) Thank | 安乃近

20250115 submission (review)
20250219 first round of review comments
20250225 response to review comments
20250311 pre-acceptance
20250312 format revised and submitted
20250312 accepted

The first round had two reviewers, who asked very professional questions, likely from the same field.

Wishing the journal continued success.

(0) Thank | YSYS

Finally, the dust has settled! Updated, submitted on November 1, 2024. Under review on November 2. Received feedback on December 4, the three reviewers were very professional and provided constructive suggestions, I feel like I have learned a lot! Accepted on January 15, 2025 after three rounds of revisions. I am honored that this work is being published in Chem. I feel that this journal has high standards for the integrity and innovation of work, and pays attention to details.

(0) Thank | 沐雨清风

Record the submission time, submitted on November 1st, reviewed on November 2nd, Chem is quite efficient! Still waiting now, looking forward to a good result.

(0) Thank | 沐雨清风

Have you transferred to CRPS?

(0) Thank | krfql3

Submitted on September 1, 2024. Status unknown.

(0) Thank | 玉面小青龙鸭

Refused, suggest CRPS on 2024.07.01.

(0) Thank | 想发Nat Catal.

I guess the editor is on vacation. To be honest, I don't have a very good impression of their work.

(0) Thank | 想发Nat Catal.

I am the 10th one sent to the editor, but still no news. I don't know if we have the same editor? I really don't know what's going on with these editors, taking so long.

(0) Thank | 123t

Submission Diary
2024.06.11 submitted
2024.06.11 with editor
No changes until the 26th.

(0) Thank | 想发Nat Catal.

I'm just asking, do you think everyone else is a dog like you, kneeling and licking Chem?!

(1) Thank | 薛定谔猫

You are disgusting, can't even stand the comments below and still have the face to come and submit articles, only to be rejected after submission

(0) Thank | xuxiaomingabc

I suggest switching to another platform that same night, with a posting frequency of 200 articles a year... it's just too difficult

(0) Thank | 大王叫我来巡山

Submitted on 2.6, with editor on 2.7, keeping track of it, wishing for good luck

(1) Thank | 大王叫我来巡山

Overall it's not bad

(0) Thank | jensenjiu

What is the review time for this journal? How long does it usually take to receive acceptance? Probably over a year

(1) Thank | 薛定谔猫

Kutabuta oyoyoyoyo

(2) Thank | jensenjiu

Thank you for the detailed sharing. The engagement factor of this publication is quite high

(0) Thank | 笑忘书老师

Can you stop bragging? It's not even close to being on par with Nature Chemistry. The quality of the articles in there is far inferior to JACS or Angew, and not even comparable to Nature Communications, at least in the field of organic chemistry. The visibility, impact, and recognition in applying for young talent or distinguished scientists are all lower than the previous three journals

(0) Thank | 薛定谔猫

It's a pity, but considering time constraints, I have decided to switch to reception. The quality of the articles on Chem Catalysis looks quite good, and I am optimistic about it. It should be worth investing in

(0) Thank | mpjiang

Is it not possible to argue? What a pity. The level of Chem Catalysis may reach that of ACS Catalysis in the future

(0) Thank | dataiyang

Chem submission process:
3/2/2023 under review
5/22/2023 all review completed
5/24/2023 major revision
7/3/2023 submitted revised manuscript r1
7/5/2023 under review
8/10/2023 major revision
8/28/2023 submitted revised manuscript r2
10/11/2023 Unfortunately, reviewer 1 still does not agree, suggest transfer to Chem Catalysis.

10/11 Chem Catalysis accepted directly

(0) Thank | mpjiang

Submission Process:
Received: October 10, 2022
Revised: February 19, 2023
Accepted: March 20, 2023
Published: April 19, 2023

In terms of electrocatalysis, overall, it went quite smoothly, and the reviewers were very professional. This work took more than two years to be considered by Science and Nature, but later my supervisor directly submitted it to Chem along with the review comments and the article. Let's keep up the good work!!

(16) Thank | 无敌小猪猪

What is the format modification for?

(0) Thank | langman