The review is rigorous, the process is standardized, and it can better improve article quality. The reviewers are all small peers, who can better find problems. I hope that this journal has an increasing influence.

(1) Thank | anvien

Transaction series are still relatively strict. It was revised repeatedly for 9 months, and questions have been asked for several rounds, which tortured my heart seriously. It may not be suitable for students who are in a hurry.

(2) Thank | 假设

Reviewers were relatively fast and had strict requirements on articles. Five reviewers repeatedly revised the paper three times and bombarded the article. Fortunately, I was patient and revised it carefully, and responded to the comments with more than 30 pages. The impact factor is rising little by little, and I hope that it will be better and better!

(8) Thank | Pig Trump

The review is fast and standardized, the journal is very good, and we hope it gets better and better.

(6) Thank | shai

Trash journals, wasted a year and a half of my time. After two major revisions and one minor revision, they still rejected it. Do I need to say more about their quality?

(0) Thank | 亦冷

After two major repairs and one minor repair, it was rejected. There is no need to say more about what components are not in use.

(0) Thank | 亦冷

Sorry, no can do. I wish you drop to District Four soon.

(0) Thank | 亦冷

Borrowed building, trashy journal, wasted one and a half years of my time. After two major revisions and one minor revision, it was rejected. Be cautious when submitting.

(0) Thank | 亦冷

Borrowed building, trashy journal, wasted me a year and a half, rejected after two major revisions and one minor revision, purely relational journal.

(0) Thank | 亦冷

It's been so slow, it's been a month and there's been no news at all.

(0) Thank | sexy Margaret

请问你的名字是什么？

(0) Thank | AdFiFi

I have been "Awaiting AE Recommendation" for a month!! Where is my AE?

(0) Thank | pxwang@buaa.edu.cn

25/03/08 Resubmit
25/03/08 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
25/04/07 Awaiting AE Recommendation
25/04/23 Awaiting EIC Decision
25/04/26 Accepted (Final Files)

(0) Thank | vash1970

24/12/17 Submit
N/A Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
25/01/18 Query Manuscript Status
25/01/24 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
25/02/07 Awaiting AE Recommendation
25/02/20 Awaiting EIC Decision
25/02/20 Major Revision

(0) Thank | vash1970

24/04/08 Submit
N/A Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
24/09/03 Query Manuscript Status
24/09/25 Query Manuscript Status
24/10/14 Query Manuscript Status
N/A Awaiting Reviewer Scores
N/A Awaiting AE Recommendation
N/A Awaiting EIC Decision
24/11/06 Reject&Resubmit

(0) Thank | vash1970

The entire submission process takes more than 12 months. Among them, the time for Awaiting Reviewer Assignment is the longest, exceeding 6 months. The review time is approximately 2 weeks to 1 month. Awaiting AE Recommendation takes 2 to 3 weeks each time. After AE Recommendation, the decision from the EIC is made within 3 days. Reminder emails are usually replied to within 3 days. Since the evaluation is limited to 500 characters, the submission record is attached to the reply for reference.

(0) Thank | vash1970

I would like to ask you, do we need to create a system for this journal?

(0) Thank | 想毕业123

Why did you change the reviewer for my revised submission? I followed the previous reviewer's comments and wrote a response letter, and you just switched it up on me? That's not even the worst part, the first two reviews were positive and were awaiting the editor's decision, but the next day it's back to "awaiting reviewer scores." The editor and AE specifically found a third negative reviewer to reject it, and their classic criticism was "lack of novelty." Seriously, why don't they investigate what others in the field are working on instead of just criticizing my use of a toy dataset? I even used more difficult and larger datasets than the baseline in the same direction. I seriously doubt the competence of the editor, AE, and the outrageous reviewers they found. They don't even dare to provide contact information for the AE, and the reviews only contain opinions without any specific decisions. You guys are a joke, I hope you go out of business soon!

(1) Thank | 只想bi业

The quality of the peer review is not very good.

(0) Thank | 我来也啊

Can I ask everyone, what is the situation with the previously rejected and resubmitted article awaiting the editor-in-chief's decision on 27th February 2025, with both "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and "Awaiting AE Recommendation" statuses coexisting on 28th February 2025?

(0) Thank | 只想bi业

Sure, thank you very much!

(0) Thank | Ljingting

It will soon be preprinted and available online, followed by back-and-forth interaction with editors to make layout modifications, and then payment. I preprinted in February and will be officially published in August.

(0) Thank | AdFiFi

Hello, may I ask how long it will be online after accepting?

(0) Thank | Ljingting

This journal is just a piece of shit. If you are not a connection, you will be humiliated by the editor. Yes, it's blatant humiliation. They leave the paper under review for four or five months without any response. Then they provide a few extremely poor quality review comments that could be written in 10 minutes. And then they reject the paper. And the most disgusting part is that after rejecting the paper, they encourage you to resubmit, and the whole process repeats again. I have been humiliated in this way three times. You may ask why I allow myself to be humiliated like this. It's because the corresponding author is a bit crazy and keeps asking me to resubmit.

(2) Thank | pkw2009

Hello, have you received the AE's feedback now? I have been waiting for the AE's feedback for almost a month.

(0) Thank | Hello_world