Reviewing time after finding the reviewer: 2 months for the first review, 3 months for the second review.

(1) Thank | 脑浆豆腐花

The review time was quite long, and it was finally rejected and it was written that it could not be published. In short, it is not very responsible and time-consuming.

(9) Thank | 无心学术

I submitted an article on heat island effect and it has been accepted. The whole review process lasted more than 2 months. It was accepted after the revision was submitted. The efficiency was pretty high. The overall level of the journal is getting higher and higher, and it will be better in the future. It is worth recommending.

(8) Thank | yzw子非鱼

There are many big names on the editorial board of this journal. I have published another paper with this journal.  The editor-in-chief has recognized the quality of my paper and invited me to be a reviewer several times. Thank you very much for the opportunity!

(0) Thank | 齐德隆东墙

On June 4th, due to the inability to find expert reviewers, the manuscript was rejected. Despite our best efforts, we were unable to obtain high-quality reviews for the manuscript. Regrettably, the feedback received from referees did not meet the standard necessary to make an informed editorial decision. In the interest of avoiding further delays in publication, we have made the decision to reject the manuscript. Despite inviting over 20 referees, many either declined to review or submitted reports that were inadequate for making an informed decision.

(0) Thank | 艾森伯格

Submission on 25th February 2024
Major revision on 19th January 2025
Revised major revision on 18th February 2025
Major revision on 5th April 2025
Revised major revision on 8th April 2025
Acceptance on 10th May 2025
There are many comments from reviewers, the submission process is difficult, please consider carefully before submitting!

(0) Thank | ACLuke

4.25 The time for WE has changed once. I am curious, is this journal similar to Elsevier's journals? Does changing the time for WE once have any relationship with the probability of acceptance? I would like to consult with experienced seniors who have encountered similar situations.

(0) Thank | 艾森伯格

Translate the following paragraph into English: Dr. Mohammad Sameti is the editor.

(0) Thank | 艾森伯格

4.22 Submit-With editor
Why does this journal have two discussion threads?

(0) Thank | 艾森伯格

2025.02.02 submit as WE
2025.02.03 WE date update

(0) Thank | thermal19

2024.02.01 Submit as WE

(0) Thank | 想要发paper

Submitted to acceptance took almost 4 months, with one major revision. After the revision, it was accepted directly. Hope the journal will continue to improve!

(0) Thank | 杨

Submitted on February 26, 2024, with a first review period of three months, followed by a second review period of one month. Corrections will be accepted directly upon resubmission.

(0) Thank | 朱晓蕾

The recommendation is to have a review every three months, but it has been almost a month since the second review and there is still no news.

(0) Thank | 朱晓蕾

Rejected on the third day, very quickly. The template is the same as downstairs, but the content is lacking in creativity

(0) Thank | xxxt

How are you feeling?

(0) Thank | flashy

5.23 submit
5.24 with editor (handled by editor Zhuangbo Feng

(0) Thank | xxxt

May 21 Submitted to journal
May 23 With Editor

(0) Thank | 丹丹思密达

Title page should contain author information, delete the body text, the editor will probably ask you to resubmit

(0) Thank | 丹丹思密达

The Title Page should include author information, and the main text should be removed. You may need to resubmit as the editor will likely ask for it

(0) Thank | 丹丹思密达

Can I ask whether it is necessary to remove the authors' information when submitting a paper to this journal? I haven't noticed, and will it be rejected if not removed?

(0) Thank | yhqivi

Hello, does this journal require a plagiarism check?

(0) Thank | eian1

2024.01.30 submitted to journal
2024.01.31 With Editor (assigned executing editor)
2024.02.03 With Editor (executing editor completed review)
2024.02.19 Under Review (invited 7 reviewers, none accepted)
2024.03.07 Under Review (added 5 reviewers, 2 accepted)
2024.04.04 Under Review (2 accepted, 1 completed review)
2024.04.15 Required Reviews Completed (2 accepted, 2 completed review)
2024.04.18 Completed - Reject

(One reviewer requires major revisions, one rejected, blaming himself for being incompetent.)
(Plagiarism rate requirement around 10%

(0) Thank | LEOii-

Great journal, very efficient, accepted after major revisions

(0) Thank | 窝斯泥蝶

Hello, I was wondering about the specific difficulty of acceptance for this journal. Will manuscripts on regional coordinated development (at the provincial level) be rejected directly?

(0) Thank | 李初心